Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

TWO WEAKNESS ROUTES OF MARKET ECONOMY: AFGHANISTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN

PİYASA EKONOMİSİNİN İKİ ZAYIF ROTASI: AFGANİSTAN VE KIRGIZİSTAN

Pages
99–118
Publication Date
2015-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In these countries the institutions and the rules of the market economy are not developed. iii- The information, experience and the financial addition of Turkey to both countries during the process to market economy: Turkey, as a candidate to European Union may act as a bridge to the region in the aspect of modern market improvements

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan are two Central Asian economies that are historically and morally has gained interest of Turkey and at the same time are living problem within the framework of globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research question can be considered in three ways: i- The pathway of Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan to market economy: Kyrgyzstan, an old remainder of Soviet, mostly recovered the problems of transforming to market economy as Afghanistan has characteristic of “Third World”. iiThe market economy structures of these two countries: Both countries are poor and less developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In these countries the institutions and the rules of the market economy are not developed. iii- The information, experience and the financial addition of Turkey to both countries during the process to market economy: Turkey, as a candidate to European Union may act as a bridge to the region in the aspect of modern market improvements
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Küresel Piyasa Ekonomisi · Afganistan · Kırgızistan

Abstract

Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan are two Central Asian economies that are historically and morally has gained interest of Turkey and at the same time are living problem within the framework of globalization. The research question can be considered in three ways: i- The pathway of Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan to market economy: Kyrgyzstan, an old remainder of Soviet, mostly recovered the problems of transforming to market economy as Afghanistan has characteristic of “Third World”. iiThe market economy structures of these two countries: Both countries are poor and less developed. In these countries the institutions and the rules of the market economy are not developed. iii- The information, experience and the financial addition of Turkey to both countries during the process to market economy: Turkey, as a candidate to European Union may act as a bridge to the region in the aspect of modern market improvements

Özet

Afganistan ve Kırgızistan, tarihsel ve manevi değerler bakımından Türkiye’nin ilgi alanına giren; aynı zamanda kapitalist küreselleşme açısından çeşitli sorunlar yaşamakta olan iki Orta Asya ekonomisidir. Araştırma sorusu üç boyutta ele alınabilir: i-Afganistan ve Kırgızistan’ın piyasa ekonomisine geçiş serüveni: Afganistan, “Üçüncü Dünya”nın özelliğini taşıyan bir ülke görünümünde iken; Kırgızistan ise, eski bir Sovyet bakiyesi olarak liberal ekonomiye geçişin sancılarını büyük ölçüde atlatmış bir ülke görünümündedir. ii-Bu iki ülkenin benzer ve farklı piyasa ekonomisi yapıları: Her iki ülke yoksul ve geri kalmıştır. Bu ülkelerde piyasa ekonomisinin kurum ve kuralları yeterince gelişmemiştir. iii-Türkiye’nin bu iki ülkeye piyasa ekonomisine geçiş sürecinde sunabileceği bilgi, deneyim ve mali katkılar: Türkiye, Avrupa Birliği’nin aday üye olması sıfatıyla bu bölge için çağdaş piyasa gelişmeleri noktasında bir köprü işlevini görebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAYCI, İ. (2015). TWO WEAKNESS ROUTES OF MARKET ECONOMY: AFGHANISTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 99–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/3315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abazov, R. (1999). “Policy of Economic Transition in Kyrgyzstan”. Central Asian Survey. 18/2: 197-223.
  2. Ai-guo, L.(2001). “The Impact of Transition to the Market Economy on weelfare Changes: Lessons from the Experience of Asian Transitional Economies”. China & World Economy. No 2. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan003180. pdf (5/12/2012)
  3. Bıyıkoğlu, N (2010). “Orta Asya’da Su Sorunları”, Uzembassy, Haziran, 64-68 http://www.uzembassy. org.tr/files/Turkish_press/tr/press1_14072010_tr.pdf (16/4/2015)
  4. BS-Bertelsmann Stiftung (2012). Afghanistan Country Report. Gütersloh. Bold, C. (2009). “The Importance of Private Sector Development in Conflict-Affected Countries”. IFC- Smartlessons. Nov. Byrd, W. A. (2008). “Responding to Afghanistan’s Opium Economy Challenge: Lessons and Policy Implications from a Development Perspective”. Policy Research Working Paper 4545. The World Bank South Asia Region. March. CAP- Country Assistance Program Evaluation (2012). “Kyrgyz Republic Country Assistance Program Evaluation: Evolving Transition to a Market Economy”. CAP: KGZ 2012-09. Independent Evaluation Department. CIA-Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the- world- fa c tboo k/ geo s /a f. factbook/geos/kg.html (20/11/2014) ht ml; https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world
  5. Cordesman, A. H. (2013). “Afghanistan: Meeting the Real World Challenges of Transition”. CSIS Report. Washington, January 23. Cordesman, A. H., Burke, A. A. (2012). “Afghanistan: The Uncertain Economics of Transition, Chair in Strategy First Working Draft”. CSIS Report. Washington, April 18. Cordesman, A. H., Mann, S. T. (2012). “Afghanistan: The Failing Economics and Civil-Military Aid Efforts of Transition, Third Working Draft”. CSIS Report. Washington, September 11. Çöloğlu, Z. (2009). “Poverty in Kyrgyz Republic in Early Transition”, Universty of Delaware Econ 868 Research Paper. http://www.thewashingtonreview.org/files/ cologlu.pdf (4/9/2014) Dąbrowski, M., Antczak, R. (1994). “Economic Reforms in Kyrgzstan”, CASE-Center for Social & Economic Research., library/Publications/Detail/?ots783 =0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c 7060233&lng= en&id= 140198 (2/10/2013)
  6. Ekonomik September, DEİK-TC Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kurulu (2012a). Afganistan Ülke Bülteni. Ankara. http://www.deik.org.tr/Contents/FileAction/2735 (6/6/2014) DEİK (2012b). Kırgızistan Ülke Bülteni. Ankara. www.deik.org.tr/Contents/FileAction/1692 (6/6/201