SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11

Karyological Characteristics of Some Endemic Onobrychis Taxa Belonging to Onobrychis Section Naturally Grown in Turkey

ONUR İLERİ
SÜLEYMAN AVCI
Pages
1530–1536
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

O. beata, O. lasistanica, and O. viciifolia were assigned to the third group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Karyotype properties of of six endemic Onobrychis taxa (O. beata, O. cilicica, O. fallax, O. podperae, O. sulphurea and O. lasistanica) naturally grown in Turkey were determined using squash preparation method and similarity of these endemics with cultivated taxon (O. viciifolia) were revealed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ploidy levels of Onobrychis taxa were diploid (2n=14) except O. lasistanica and O. viciifolia (2n=28).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:O. beata, O. lasistanica, and O. viciifolia were assigned to the third group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Karyotype properties of of six endemic Onobrychis taxa (O. beata, O. cilicica, O. fallax, O. podperae, O. sulphurea and O. lasistanica) naturally grown in Turkey were determined using squash preparation method and similarity of these endemics with cultivated taxon (O. viciifolia) were revealed. Ploidy levels of Onobrychis taxa were diploid (2n=14) except O. lasistanica and O. viciifolia (2n=28). Basic chromosome number is x=7 and chromosomes ranged from median to sub median with regard to centromere position. While the longest total chromosome length was measured in O. cilicica (28.21 μm), the shortest total chromosome length was in O. beata (21.47 μm). O. cilicica and O. sulphurea have satellite on chromosome 1 and chromosome 2, respectively. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to determine the relationships among the Onobrychis taxa and they were separated into three groups. O. fallax, and O. podperae were in the first group while O. sulphurea and O. cilicica were in the second group. O. beata, O. lasistanica, and O. viciifolia were assigned to the third group.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLERİ, O., AVCI, S. (2018). Karyological Characteristics of Some Endemic Onobrychis Taxa Belonging to Onobrychis Section Naturally Grown in Turkey. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11, 1530–1536. https://ajindex.com/articles/331459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abou-El-Enain MM. 2002. Chromosomal criteria and their phylogenetic implications in the genus Onobrychis Mill. sect. Lophobrychis (Leguminosae), with special reference to Egyptian species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4): 409-414. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8339. 2002.00075.x Acikgoz E. 2001,
  2. Yem Bitkileri, Uludag Universitesi Guclendirme Vakfi Yayin No:182, Yayin No: 58, Bursa, 584 s. ISBN: 975-564-124-6
  3. Akcelik Somay E, Avcı S, Uzun S, Sancak C. 2012. Karyotype analysis of some Onobrychis (Sainfoin) species in Turkey. Archives of Biological Sciences, 64(2): 567-571. DOI: 10.2298/ABS1202567A Aktoklu E. 2001. Two new varieties and a new record in Onobrychis from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 25(5): 359-363. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ abstract. htm?id=4973 Altin M, Gokkus A, Koc A. 2005, Cayır Mera Islahı. T.C. Tarim ve Koyisleri Bakanlıgı Yayınları, Ankara, 468s. ISBN: 975- 407-188-8
  4. Avci S, Kaya MD. 2013. Seed and germination characteristics of wild Onobrychis taxa in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37(5): 550-560. DOI: 10.3906/tar- 1211-29
  5. Avci S, Sancak C, Can A, Acar A, Pınar NM. 2013. Pollen morphology of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 37(4): 669-681. DOI: 10.3906/bot-1207-52
  6. Avci S, Ilhan E, Erayman M, Sancak C. 2016. Analysis of Onobrychis Genetic Diversity Using SSR Markers From Related Legume Species. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(2): 556-566. Available from: http:// www.thejaps.org.pk /docs/v-24-2/29.pdf Avci S, Tekin N, Sancak C, Özcan S, Maraghi AO. 2016. Phylogenetic Relationship of Some Onobrychis Taxa Naturally Grown in Turkey Based on Morphology and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA ITS Sequences. Legume Research, 39(5): 665-673. DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.11184 Elci S. 2005. Baklagil ve Buğdaygil Yem Bitkileri. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Ankara, 486 s. ISBN: 975-407-189- 6 Elci S, Sancak C. 2009. Sitogenetikte Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Gözlemler. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 1576, Ankara, 227 s. Ghanavati F, Nematpajooh N, Khosrow Chahli M, Safaei Chaeikar S. 2012. Cytological evaluation of annual species of the Onobrychis genus in Iran. Crop Breeding Journal 2: 17-24. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.853.2795&rep=rep1&type=pdf Hedge IC. 1970. Onobrychis Adams. In: Davis, PH (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 3: 560–589.
  7. Hejazi HSM, Mahdi ZN. 2010. Cytotaxonomy