Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Botanical Composition and In Situ Dry Matter Degradability of Legume Grass Mixture Pasture Fertilized with Different Amounts of Nitrogen

Pages
16–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Application of nitrogen fertilizer results indicated that nitrogen fertilizer decreased the legumes ratio (LR) of pasture, approximately 22.4%, Although N fertilizer increased the grass ratio (GR) of pasture approximately 55.8%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the effects of different nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels on botanical composition, dry matter (DM) yield, chemical composition, in situ ruminal DM and NDF degradability and net energy lactation (NEL) of a native legumegrass mixture pasture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pasture was fertilized at six levels of N fertilizer (ammonium nitrate, N0, N50, N100, N150, N200 and N250 kg/ha).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Application of nitrogen fertilizer results indicated that nitrogen fertilizer decreased the legumes ratio (LR) of pasture, approximately 22.4%, Although N fertilizer increased the grass ratio (GR) of pasture approximately 55.8%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels on botanical composition, dry matter (DM) yield, chemical composition, in situ ruminal DM and NDF degradability and net energy lactation (NEL) of a native legumegrass mixture pasture. Field and degradability trials were arranged in a Complete Randomized Block Design with three replicates. Pasture was fertilized at six levels of N fertilizer (ammonium nitrate, N0, N50, N100, N150, N200 and N250 kg/ha). Three rumen cannulated Holstein Friesian heifers (3-4 year old) were used. Feed samples were incubated for 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h. Application of nitrogen fertilizer results indicated that nitrogen fertilizer decreased the legumes ratio (LR) of pasture, approximately 22.4%, Although N fertilizer increased the grass ratio (GR) of pasture approximately 55.8%. Dry matter (DM), Net energy lactation (NEL, Mcal/kg) and ash contents of pasture were increased by increasing N fertilizer level. However, when N fertilizer level increased acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentration of pasture decreased. Application of the different rate of nitrogen fertilizer had no effect on in situ rumen degradability of DM and NDF of pasture. It was also found that there was the significant positive relationship between effective NDF degradability at 48 h. rumen incubation period and different level of N fertilizer. In addition, it was determined that there was a linear and quadratic positive relationship between DM yield and different nitrogen doses. In conclusion, different rates of nitrogen application changed botanical composition, decreased ADF content and increased NEL and effective rumen degradability of neutral detergent fiber (EDNDF 48 h.) of pasture.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇALP, N., AVCI, M., HIZLI, H., HATİPOĞLU, R., AYAŞAN, T. (2018). Botanical Composition and In Situ Dry Matter Degradability of Legume Grass Mixture Pasture Fertilized with Different Amounts of Nitrogen. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 16–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/331336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acikgoz E. 2001.
  2. Forage Crops. University of Uludag, Publication No. 182. Bursa, Turkey, PP. 584 AOAC 1990. Official method of analysis. 15th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC. USA. Arvas Ö, Çelebi SZ, Yılmaz İH. 2011. The effect of sewage sludge and chemical fertilizer on natural pasture’s yield and botanical composition. J. Food Agric. Envir., 9: 525-530.
  3. Bleanger G, McQueen RE. 1998. Analysis of nutritive value of timothy grown with varying N nutrition. Grass Forage Sci., 53: 109-119.
  4. Calder FW, Leod M. 1968. In vitro digestibility of forage species as affected by fertiliser application stage of developmentand harvest dates. Can. J. Sci., 48: 17-24.
  5. Carver LA, Barth KM, McLam JB, Fribourg HA, Connell JT, Bryan JM. 1975. Nutritive value of midland Bermuda pastures. J. Anim. Sci., 40: 183. Campos FP, Sarmentoa P, Nussiob LG, Lugãoc SMB, Limad CG, Daniel JLP. 2013. Fiber monosaccharides and digestibility of milenio grass under N fertilization. Animal Feed Science and Technology 183: 17– 21 Dong SK, Yang ZF, Long RJ, Hu ZZ, Kang MY. 2005. Effect of N fertilizer on the productivity and nutritive values of perennial grass mixtures in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Can. J. Plant Sci., 85: 361–368.
  6. Fan FL, Zhang FS, Song YN, Sun JH, Bao XG, Guo TW, Li L. 2006. Nitrogen fixationof faba bean (Vicia faba L.) interacting with anon-legume in two contrasting intercropping systems. Plant and Soil, 283: 275-286.
  7. Hassan A, Zewdu T, Urge M, Fikru S. 2015. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on nutritive value of cenchrus ciliaris and panicum maximum grown under ırrigation at Gode, Somali Region. J Nutr Food Sci. 11: 5. Hatipoğlu R, Avcı M, Kılıçalp N, Tükel T, Kökten K, Çınar S. 2001. Çukurova bölgesindeki bir merada fosforlu gübreleme ve farklı azot dozlarının ot verimi ve kalitesi ile botanik kompozisyona etkileri üzerine bir araştırma. Türkiye 4. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, Tekirdağ, Hunt IV. 1973. Studies of response to fertilizer. Part 4. Effects of fertilizer nitrogen on the chemical composition of primary growth of perennial ryegrass. J. Grassland Soc., 28: 171-180.
  8. Islam MR, Carcia SC, Horadagoda A. 2012. Effects of residiual nitrogen, nitrogen fertilizer, sowing date and harvest time on yield and nutritive value of forage rape. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech., 177: 52-64.
  9. Jung HG, Allen MS. 1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forage by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 2774