Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 0

Evaluation on Minimum Landing Size Regulations in Turkish Marine Fisheries from Scientific Perspective

Pages
27–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows that MLS regulation must be revised for most of the species in the surrounding waters of Turkey and comprehensive maturity studies are urgently needed in order to fulfill the scientific gap.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Crucial point of fishery management is to let the fish or other species reproduce at least once during their life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 4/1 communique on commercial fishery (2016/35) published by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry was investigated in order to expose the MLS of given species in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows that MLS regulation must be revised for most of the species in the surrounding waters of Turkey and comprehensive maturity studies are urgently needed in order to fulfill the scientific gap.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Crucial point of fishery management is to let the fish or other species reproduce at least once during their life. Therefore it is very important to determine the length at maturity (Lm) for given species before the first capture. Focus of this study is to determine the consistency between scientific results and minimum landing size (MLS) regulations in the marine fishery of Turkey. For this purpose, 4/1 communique on commercial fishery (2016/35) published by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry was investigated in order to expose the MLS of given species in Turkey. Literature survey on Lm was also conducted preferably on studies which were performed in Turkish waters or from the Mediterranean basin in order to avoid regional differences. While 86 marine species were reported to be landed in the official fishery statistics, only 49 of them were appointed with a MLS in the commercial fisheries regulation. It was determined that MLS of 27 species were below the Lm according to the selected literature, 7 of them require result on Lm, status of the 2 species couldn’t be decided due to different length types and 13 (27% of the decisions on MLS) of them were found to be in accordance with the scientific literature on Lm. This study shows that MLS regulation must be revised for most of the species in the surrounding waters of Turkey and comprehensive maturity studies are urgently needed in order to fulfill the scientific gap.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYKAN, O. (2019). Evaluation on Minimum Landing Size Regulations in Turkish Marine Fisheries from Scientific Perspective. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 0, 27–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/331298

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akyol O, Tokac A, Unsal S. 1996. An investigation on the growth and reproduction characteristics of the sardine (Sardina pilchardus Walbaum, 1792) in the bay of Izmir (Aegean Sea). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 13:383–394.
  2. Bingel F, Gücü AC, Nierman U, Kıdeyş AE, Mutlu E, Doğan M, Kayıkçı Y, Avşar D, Bekiroğlu Y, Genç Y, Okur H, Zengin M. 1996. Karadeniz stok tespiti projesi balıkçılık araştırmaları. Final raporu. Deniz Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erdemli ve Su Ürünleri Araştırma Enstitüsü, Yomra, TÜBİTAK. 172 p. Brusle S, Brusle J. 1977. Les muges de Tunisie: Peˆche lagunaire et biologie de la reproduction de trois espe`ces (Mugil capito, M. cephalus et M. chelo) des lacs d’Ischkeul et de Tunis. Rapp Comm Int Mer Me´dit. 24:101–128. Cayré P, Amon Kothias JB, Diouf T, Stretta JM. 1993. Biology of tuna. In (A. Fonteneau, J. Marcille). Resources, fishing and biology of the tropical tunas of the Eastern Central Atlantic. Rome, FAO. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 292. pp:147- 244. ISBN 92-5-102652-1. Cetinić P, Soldo A, Dulčić J, Pallaoro A. 2002. Specific method of fishing for Sparidae species in the eastern Adriatic. Fisheries Research. 55:131–139.
  3. Ceyhan T, Akyol O, Ayaz A, Juanes F. 2007. Age, growth, and reproductive season of bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) in the Marmara region, Turkey. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 64:531-536. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm026. Cikeš Keč V, Zorica B. 2011. The reproductive traits of Scomber japonicus (Houttuyn, 1782) in the Eastern Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 28:15–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01893.x. Corriero A, Karakulak S, Santamarina N, Deflorio M, Spedicato D, Addis P, Desantis S, Cirillo F, Fenech-Farrugia A, Vasallo-Aguis R, De La Serna JM, Oray Y, Cau A, Megalofonou P, De Metrio G. 2005. Size and age at sexual maturity of female bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus L. 1758) from Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 21:483–486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00700.x. De Silva SS. 1973. Aspects of the reproductive biology of the sprat, Sprattus sprattus (L.) in inshore waters of the west coast of Scotland. Journal of fish biology. 5(6):689-705. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1973.tb04505.x. Engin S, Seyhan K. 2009. Age, growth, sexual maturity and food composition of Sciaena umbra in the south-eastern Black Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 25:96–99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01173.x. Erdem Y. 2018. Karadeniz barbunya balığının (Mullus barbatus ponticus) ilk üreme bo