Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

The Effect of Drying Methods on Color and Chlorophyll Content of Parsley Leaves

Pages
919–926
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, considering both quality and drying parameters, it was determined that MD and SOD were the most suitable method for drying of parsley leaves.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Parsley leaves (Petroselinum crispum L.) weighing 100 ± 0.09 g were dehydrated from moisture content of 82.24 ± 0.07% to 10.01 ± 0.02 % (wet basis) using the microwave (MD), convective (CD), solar oven (SOD), sun (SD) and natural (ND) drying.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drying in MD, CD, SOD, SD, and ND was completed at 18±1.15, 61±0.58, 255±10, 330±5.29, and 1530±11.55 min, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, considering both quality and drying parameters, it was determined that MD and SOD were the most suitable method for drying of parsley leaves.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Parsley leaves (Petroselinum crispum L.) weighing 100 ± 0.09 g were dehydrated from moisture content of 82.24 ± 0.07% to 10.01 ± 0.02 % (wet basis) using the microwave (MD), convective (CD), solar oven (SOD), sun (SD) and natural (ND) drying. Drying in MD, CD, SOD, SD, and ND was completed at 18±1.15, 61±0.58, 255±10, 330±5.29, and 1530±11.55 min, respectively. The energy consumption of MD and CD was measured as 0.213±0.009 and 0.427±0.015 kWh, respectively. In microwave drying, 700 W microwave output power was applied while convective drying was used with 50°C temperature and 1m/s air velocity. The sun and solar oven drying processes were carried out under the same conditions at the same time. The average temperature of the system during the solar oven drying was 81.7±1.5°C whereas the airflow in the system was 0.5 m/s. The data obtained from the experiments were also modeled using twelve different thin-layer drying equations, and thus the theoretical data were obtained. According to these theoretical data, the best model in the microwave and natural drying was Alibas’s equation while the most suitable model in the solar and convective drying was modified Henderson and Pabis’s model. On the other hand, it was seen that the best model in the solar oven drying was the Page equation. As a result, considering both quality and drying parameters, it was determined that MD and SOD were the most suitable method for drying of parsley leaves.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİBAŞ, İ., ZIA, M. P., YILMAZ, A. (2019). The Effect of Drying Methods on Color and Chlorophyll Content of Parsley Leaves. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 919–926. https://ajindex.com/articles/331093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aghdashlo M, Kianmehr MH, Khani S, Ghasemi M. 2009. Mathematical modeling of carrot thin layer drying using new model. Int. Agrophys., 23: 313-317. Akpinar EK. 2006. Mathematical modelling of thin layer drying process under the open sun of some aromatic plants. J. Food Eng., 76: 864-870.
  2. Akpinar EK, Bicer Y, Cetinkaya F. 2006. Modelling of thin layer drying of parsley leaves in a convective dryer and under open sun. J. Food Eng., 75(3): 308-315. Alibas I. 2006. Characteristics of chard leaves during microwave, convective, and combined microwave-convective drying. Dry Technol., 24: 1425-1435. Alibas I. 2007. Energy consumption and colour characteristics of nettle leaves during microwave, vacuum and convective drying. Biosyst Eng., 96(4): 495-502. Alibas I. 2010.
  3. Determination of Drying Parameters, Ascorbic Acid Contents and Color Characteristics of Nettle Leaves during Microwave-, Air- and Combined Microwave-Air- Drying. J. Food Process Eng., 33(2): 213-233. Alibas I. 2012. Microwave Drying of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Leaves and Determination of Some Quality Parameters. Tarım Bilim Derg., 18(1): 43-53. Andrés A, Bilbao C, Fito P. 2004. Drying kinetics of apple cylinders under combined hot air–microwave dehydration. J. Food Eng., 63: 71-78.
  4. Babalis SJ, Papanicolaou E, Kyriakis N, Belessiotis VG. 2006. Evaluation of thin-layer drying models for describing drying kinetics of figs (Ficus carica). J. Food Eng., 75: 205-214.
  5. Bakowski J, Michalik H. 1986. Suitability of several vegetable species for production of dried vegetables. Biuletyn Warzywniczy., 29: 191-211.
  6. Basunia MA, Abe T. 2001. Thin-layer solar drying characteristics of rough rice under natural convection. J. Food Eng., 47: 295- 301. Davidson VJ, Li X, Brown RB. 2004. Forced-air drying of ginseng root and the effects of air temperature on quality. J. Food Eng., 63: 361-367.
  7. Diamante LM, Munro PA. 1993. Mathematical modelling of hot air drying of sweet potato slices. Dry Technol., 26: 99-109. Díaz-Maroto MC, Perez-Coello MS, Cabezudo MD. 2002. Effect of Drying Methods on The Volatile Components of Parsley (Petroselinum crispum L.). Eur Food Res Technol., 215(3): 227-230. Díaz GR, Martínez-Monzó J, Fito P, Chiralt A. 2003. Modelling of dehydration-rehydration of orange slices in combined microwave-air drying. Innov Food Sci Emerg., 4: 203-209.
  8. Essalhi H, Benchrifa M, Tadili R, Bargach MN. 2018. Experimental and theoretical analysis of drying grapes under an indirect solar dryer and in open sun. Inn