Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

The Comparison of Milk and Reproductive Performance of Saanen and Saanen × Hair Goat Crossbreds (F1, B1 & B2) and Growth Performance of their Kids in Semi-Intensive Production System

Pages
871–876
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings related to performance characteristics in goat genotypes investigated show that B1 genotype could be recommend for semi-intensive production system in the Western Anatolia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aims of this study were to evaluate the traits of reproductive, milking and growth performance of Saanen and Saanen × Hair crossbreds (F1, B1 and B2) raised at the Bandırma Sheep Research Institute.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected from 868 goats for reproductive performance and milk yield and from 1077 kids for survival performance between 2009-2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings related to performance characteristics in goat genotypes investigated show that B1 genotype could be recommend for semi-intensive production system in the Western Anatolia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aims of this study were to evaluate the traits of reproductive, milking and growth performance of Saanen and Saanen × Hair crossbreds (F1, B1 and B2) raised at the Bandırma Sheep Research Institute. The data were collected from 868 goats for reproductive performance and milk yield and from 1077 kids for survival performance between 2009-2012. Milk components (fat, protein, lactose and non-fat dry matter) of goats (n=162) and body weight changes of kid’s (n=64) were evaluated for one year in 2012. Estrus rates and survival rates were similar among all genotypes. Kidding rate was significantly higher in F1 goats than Saanen goats. Saanen goat had the lowest average mean daily milk yield compared with other genotypes. The effect of year and age were significant on milk yield. Goats in F1 and B1 genotypes had higher milk protein percentage and non-fat dry matter content in comparison with Saanen and B2 genotype. Milk fat and lactose contents were similar among genotypes. Birth weight and monthly live weight were similar between genotypes while weaning weight, six month live weight and yearling live weight were higher in B1 kids in comparison with Saanen kids. The effect of dam age and birth type were significant on birth weight, monthly live weight and weaning weight. The findings related to performance characteristics in goat genotypes investigated show that B1 genotype could be recommend for semi-intensive production system in the Western Anatolia.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIR, M., KARADAĞ, O., YILMAZ, M., YÜKSEL, M. A., SEZENLER, T., CEYHAN, A. (2019). The Comparison of Milk and Reproductive Performance of Saanen and Saanen × Hair Goat Crossbreds (F1, B1 & B2) and Growth Performance of their Kids in Semi-Intensive Production System. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 871–876. https://ajindex.com/articles/331088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adnoy T. 2014. The dairy goat industry in Norway: challenges in a historical perspective. Small Ruminant Research, 122: 4-9.
  2. Akdağ F, Pir H, Teke B. 2011. Comparison of growth traits in Saanen and Saanen X Hair crossbred (F1) kids. Journal of Animal Production, 52 (1): 33-38. Atay O. 2016. Fattening performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Alpine x Hair goat (F1), Saanen x Hair goat (F1) and Hair goat kids. Journal of Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty, 13 (3): 129. Bolacalı M, Küçük M. 2012. Fertility and milk production characteristics of Saanen goats raised in Muş region. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 18 (3): 351-358.
  3. Ceyhan A, Karadağ O. 2009. Some descriptive characteristics of Saanen goat raised in Marmara Livestock Research Institute. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15 (2): 196-203.
  4. Danchin-Burge C, Allain D, Clément V, Piacère A, Martin P, Palhière I. 2012. Genetic variability and French breeding programs of three goat breeds under selection. Small Ruminant Research, 108: 36-44. Dellal G. 2000. Some structural characteristics of Hair goat rearing in Antalya province, II some reproductive traits, managements of milking and shearing period. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5 (4): 124-129.
  5. Erten Ö, Yılmaz O. 2013. Investigation of reproductive and milk yield traits of Hair goats raised under extensive conditions. Van Veterinary Journal, 24 (3), 105-107. Escareño L, Salinas-Gonzalez H, Wurzinger M, Iñiguez L, Sölkner J, Meza-Herrera C. 2012. Dairy goat production systems status quo, perspectives and challenges. Tropical Animal Health Production, 45(1): 17-34.
  6. Gökdal Ö, Atay O, Özuğur AK, Eren V. 2013. Growth and survival characteristics of Hair goat and its crosses with Saanen and Alpine goats under rural farm conditions. Journal of Animal Production, 54 (1): 30-37 Gürsoy O. 2006. Economics and profitability of sheep and goat production in Turkey under new support regimes and market conditions. Small Ruminant Research, 62: 181-191. Kaymakçı M. 2006. Improved sheep production. Sheep and Goat Breeders Association publications. Bornova, İzmir. 1: 79pp. Önder H, Şen U, Takma Ç, Ocak S, Abacı SH. 2015. Genetic parameter estimates for growth traits in Saanen kids. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 21 (6): 799-804, 2015 DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13407 Song HB, Jo IH, Sol HS. 2006. Reproductive performance of Korean native goats under natural and intensive conditions. Small Ruminant