Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Water Use, Yield, Yield Components and Fruit Quality in Rio-Red Grapefruit Orchard

Kısıntılı Sulamanın Greyfurt Bahçesinde Su Kullanımı, Verim, Verim Öğeleri ve Meyve Niteliğine Etkisi

Pages
116–124
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of this study, since the effects of irrigation issues on fruit yield are not statistically significant, water shortage may be proposed for farmers in order to save water.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was carried out in 2011 and 2012 on the plot of the ‘Rio-Red’grapefruit of Çukurova University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to determine evaluation of irrigation program in Rio-Red Grapefruit Orchard and the effects of water content, water use, tree and fruit development, yield and fruit quality characteristics(pomology) applied to Rio-Red subspecies trees at different levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of this study, since the effects of irrigation issues on fruit yield are not statistically significant, water shortage may be proposed for farmers in order to save water.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The research was carried out in 2011 and 2012 on the plot of the ‘Rio-Red’grapefruit of Çukurova University. In this study, it was aimed to determine evaluation of irrigation program in Rio-Red Grapefruit Orchard and the effects of water content, water use, tree and fruit development, yield and fruit quality characteristics(pomology) applied to Rio-Red subspecies trees at different levels. Three different irrigation schemes I100, I70 and I50waterwas applied. The average amount of irrigation water applied to grapefruit trees ranged from 332,48 mm (I100) to 128,69 mm (I50). The actual plant water consumption was found to be between 935,6 mm (I100) and 729,9 mm (I50) according to the water budget method. In the first year of the study, yields per irrigation ranged from 306 (I70) to 330 (I50) kg per tree. And they field per irrigation ranged from 59,6 kg (I100) and 108,5 kg (I50) for the second year. The total water use efficiencies obtained in 2011 were between WUEEt 5,18 kg/m3and 6,34 kg/m3; 0,52 kg/m3 to 1,74 kg/m3. The irrigation water use efficiencies in 2011, WUEI between 15,85 kg/m3 and 30,69 kg/m3, in 2012 from 2,17 kg/m3 to 14,27 kg/m3. The average amounts of water soluble solids content in the first year of operation were between 10,22% (I100) and 12,91% (I50); and from 12,41% (I100) to 13,47% (I50) in the second year. Within the scope of this study, since the effects of irrigation issues on fruit yield are not statistically significant, water shortage may be proposed for farmers in order to save water.

Özet

Araştırma, Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Çiftliğinde bulunan Rio Red altıntop ağaçları kullanılarak 2011 ve 2012 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada, deneme bahçesindeki mevcut sulama proğramının değerlendirilmesi ile ağaçlara farklı düzeylerde uygulanan sulama suyu miktarının, verim ile meyve kalite özellikleri (pomoloji) üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Denemede damla sulama sistemi ile 3 farklı miktarda sulama suyu uygulanmıştır (I100); (I70); (I50). Her iki yıl dikkate alındığında sulama suyu miktarları, 332,48 mm (I100) ile 128,69 mm (I50) arasında değişmiştir. Gerçek bitki su tüketimleri ise su bütçesi yöntemine göre 935,6 mm (I100) ile 729,9 mm (I50) arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Denemenin birinci yılında, sulama konularına ilişkin verimler, ağaç başına, 306 (I70) ile 330 (I50) kg, ikinci yıl ise ağaç başına ortalama verim değerlerinin sulama konularına göre, 59,6 kg (I100) ile 108,5 kg (I50) arasında değişmiştir. Toplam su kullanma randımanları, 2011 yılında, WUEET 5,18 kg m-3ile 6,34 kg m-3, 2012 yılında ise; 0,52 kg m-3ile 1,74 kg m-3arasında elde edilmiştir. Sulama suyu kullanma randımanları, 2011 yılında, WUEI 15,85 kg m-3ile 30,69 kg m-3, 2012 yılında ise; 2,17 kg m-3ile 14,27 kg m-3değerleriarasında değişmiştir. Denemenin birinci yılında ortalama suda çözünen kuru madde miktarları, %10,22 (I100) ile %12,91 (I50) arasında; ikinci yılında ise %12,41 (I100) ile %13,47 (I50) arasında değişmiştir. Bu çalışma kapsamında sulama konularının meyve verimine etkilerinin istatistiksel olarak önemli olmamasından dolayı çifçilere su tasarrufu sağlamak amacıyla yöre için su kısıntısı önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEKEÇ, U., ÖZEKİCİ, B. (2020). The Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Water Use, Yield, Yield Components and Fruit Quality in Rio-Red Grapefruit Orchard. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 116–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/331071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aguado A, Frias J, Garcia-Tejero I, Romero F, Uriel JL, Capote N. 2012. Towarsds The Improvement of Fruit-Quality Parameters in Citrus Under Deficit Irragation Strategies.ISRN (İnternational Scholarly Research Network) Agronamy, Article ID 940896. 9 Pages. Assaf R, Levin I, Brawdo B. 1975.Effect of Irrigation Regimes on Trunk and Fruit Growth Rates, Quality and Yield of Apple Trees. J. Hort. Sci, 50:481-493.
  2. Ballester C, Castel J, Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR. 2011. Response of Clementina De Nules Citrus Trees to Summer Deficit İrrigation. Yield Components and Fruit Composition. Agricultural Water Management, Bevington, 98:1027–1032.
  3. Chalmers DJ, Mitchell PD, Van Heek L, 1981. Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulatedwater supply, tree density and summer pruning. J. Am. Soc. Hor. Sci. 106:307–312.
  4. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield Response to Water. FAO United Nations, Irr. and Drain. Paper, No. 33,Rome, 193 S. English MJ, Musick JT, Murty VV, 1990.
  5. Deficit Irrigation."Manegement of Farm Irrigation Systems, Edit. Hoffman G J, Howell TA, Solomon KH," Chap.17.An ASAE Monograph,St. Joseph, MI, 631-663 s. FAO. 2018. Statistical Databases/FAOSTATE/Agriculture /Agricultural Production. http://www.Fao.Org. Erişim tarihi:12.08.2018 Garcia PM. Castel JR. 2004. The Response of Valencia Orange Trees to İrrigation in Uruguay. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research,2(3):429–443.
  6. Garcia TI, Duran ZV, Arriaga SJ, Muriel FJL. 2012. Impact of Water Stress on Citrus Yield. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 32 (3), Pp.651-659.
  7. Garcia TI, Duran ZH, Jimenez BJA, Muriel FJL.2011a. Improved Water-Use Efficiency By Deficit-İrrigation Programmes:İmplications for Saving Water in Citrus Orchards. Scientia horticulturae,128:274–282
  8. Garcia TI, Jimenez BJA, Martinez G, Romero R, DuranZ.V, Muriel FJL. 2010a. Positive İmpact of Regulated Deficit İrrigation on Yield and Fruit Quality in a Commercial Citrus Orchard [Citrus Sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Cv. Salustiano]. Agricultural Water Management, 97:614–622.
  9. Goldhamer DA, Salınas M. 2000. Evaluation of Regulated Deficit İrrigation on Mature Orange Trees Grown Under High Evaporative Demand. Proc International Society of Citriculture (ISC), IX Congress, Orlando, FL, USA. Pp. 227-231.
  10. Gonzalez AP, Castel JR.2000. Regulated Deficit İrrigation in Clementina De Nules’Citrus Trees. II.Vegetative Growth. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology,75:388–392.
  11. Goodwin I, Boland AM. 2000. Sc