Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey

Pages
733–740
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The evidence from this study is that floristic pattern is not merely a result of invader forage species, but also might be a beneficial result that deserves further study for mountainous rangelands.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to investigate the floristic features (family, preference by grazers, growth form and response to grazing) and qualities of forage species collected from mountainous rangeland (Akdağ Mountain, Ladik) in the middle Black Sea region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forage samples were collected five times by 15-day intervals from the before-flowering stage to the after-flowering stage in 2015 and 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The evidence from this study is that floristic pattern is not merely a result of invader forage species, but also might be a beneficial result that deserves further study for mountainous rangelands.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was carried out to investigate the floristic features (family, preference by grazers, growth form and response to grazing) and qualities of forage species collected from mountainous rangeland (Akdağ Mountain, Ladik) in the middle Black Sea region of Turkey. Forage samples were collected five times by 15-day intervals from the before-flowering stage to the after-flowering stage in 2015 and 2016. The total number of species was 105 species belonging to 73 genera and related to 26 families. Of the total species, 20 were from Poaceae (19.0%), 30 were from Poaceae (28.6%). Rests of the species belonged to other families (52.4%) dominated by families such as Asteraceae (13/55) and Lamiaceae (6/55), of which 26 species were weeds harmful to animals. While the percentages of decreaser, increaser and invader species were 16.2, 12.4 and 71.4, those of annual, biennial and perennial species were 31.9, 2.9 and 65.2, respectively. The number of species preferred by grazing was 74 (70.5%), while the number of nonpreferable species was 31 (29.5%). The ME (MJ kg-1 ), RFQ and quality category of legumes, grass, and other botanical families were found as 8.88±0.07, 130.9±3.05 and very good, 8.00±0.07, 83.2±1.62 and good, and 8.98±0.07, 141.0±3.62 and premium, respectively. These results can be used as a management tool to improve rangeland quality and sustainability. The evidence from this study is that floristic pattern is not merely a result of invader forage species, but also might be a beneficial result that deserves further study for mountainous rangelands.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, İ., PAK, B., ALGAN, D., OCAK, N. (2020). Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 733–740. https://ajindex.com/articles/330936

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abdelaal M, Ahmed D, Fois M, Fenu G, Bacchetta G. 2019. Floristic patterns and ecological drivers of sand dune ecosystem along the Mediterranean coast of Egypt. Arid Land Res. Manag., 33: 388-411. DOI: 10.1080/15324982.2018.1564147., Algan D, Aydın İ, Ocak N. 2018. Economic analysis of fertilization based on the nutritional value of rangeland: A new opinion. Anadolu J. Agr. Sci., 33: 246-253. DOI: 10.7161/omuanajas.404991. Algan D, Ocak N, Aydin I, 2019. Productive potential and quality of overgrazed rangelands subjected to overseeding and fertilization. Fresen. Environ. Bull., 28: 5916-5925.
  2. Allen CR, Angeler DG, Fontaine JJ, Garmestani AS, Hart NM, Pope KL, Twidwell D. 2017. Adaptive management of rangeland systems. In Rangeland Systems. Springer, Cham. pp: 373-394. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2_11. Amiri F, Shariff ARBM. 2012. Comparison of nutritive values of grasses and legume species using forage quality index. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 34: 577-586.
  3. Arzani H, Basiri M, Khatibi F, Ghorbani GR. 2006. Nutritive value of some Zagros Mountain rangeland species. Small Ruminant Res., 65: 128-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres. 2005.05.033. Arzani H, Ahmadi Z, Azarnivand H, Bihamta MR. 2010. Forage quality of three life forms of rangeland species in semi-arid and semi humid regions in different phenological stages. Desert., 15: 71-74. DOI: 10.22059/jdesert.2011.23003. Aydin I, Algan D, Pak B, Ocak N. 2019. Similarity analysis with respect to some quality indicators and quality categories based on relative forage quality ranges of desirable rangeland forages. Fresen. Environ. Bull., 28: 5926-5936.
  4. Aydın İ, Ocak N, Pak B, Süzer RP. 2018. Experiments on development of quality index in forage crops based on relative forage quality (RFQ). The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Agriculture, Forestry and Veterinary Research Group, AFVRG-Project No- 214O228, Report of Final Results. Bremm C, Carvalho PCF, Fonseca L, Amaral GA, Mezzalira JC, Perez NB, Nabinger C, Laca EA. 2016. Diet switching by mammalian herbivores in response to exotic grass invasion. PLoS One., 11: e0150167. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150167. Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front. Plant Sci., 9: 535. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00535. Carlier L, Rotar I, Vlahova M, Vidican R. 2009. Importance and functions of grasslands. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj., 37: 25-30. DOI: 10.15835/nbha3713090. Casler MD, Undersander DJ.