Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Tillage, Crop Residue and Nitrogen Management Effects on Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Rice

Pages
610–615
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Grain yield and straw yield were significantly higher in residue applied treatment and recommended nitrogen but harvest index was higher in farmers-nitrogen dose.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Field experiment was conducted in three factorial strip split plot design to evaluate the effect of two establishment methods (EM) i.e. transplanted in puddled soil (Pu-TPR) and direct seeded in zero tillage (ZT-DSR), two residue levels i.e. residue kept at 3 t ha -1 (RK) and no residue (RR) with two nitrogen doses i.e. recommended dose (100 kg N ha -1 ) (RD) and farmers' dose (50 kg N ha-1 ) (FD) with six replications with individual plot size of 5.4 m × 6.3 m on rice variety Ramdhan during the year 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiencies and yield of rice were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Grain yield and straw yield were significantly higher in residue applied treatment and recommended nitrogen but harvest index was higher in farmers-nitrogen dose.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Field experiment was conducted in three factorial strip split plot design to evaluate the effect of two establishment methods (EM) i.e. transplanted in puddled soil (Pu-TPR) and direct seeded in zero tillage (ZT-DSR), two residue levels i.e. residue kept at 3 t ha -1 (RK) and no residue (RR) with two nitrogen doses i.e. recommended dose (100 kg N ha -1 ) (RD) and farmers' dose (50 kg N ha-1 ) (FD) with six replications with individual plot size of 5.4 m × 6.3 m on rice variety Ramdhan during the year 2016. Nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiencies and yield of rice were recorded. Straw nitrogen uptake was significantly higher in ZT-DSR than Pu-TPR. Similarly, grain straw and total nitrogen uptake were significantly higher in residue applied and recommended dose of nitrogen than noresidue applied and farmers-nitrogen dose treatments respectively. Nitrogen efficiency ratio and physiological efficiency index were significantly higher in Pu-TPR and no-residue applied treatments while partial factor productivity was higher in residue applied treatment. All nitrogen use efficiencies like partial factor productivity, nitrogen efficiency ratio and physiological efficiency index were significantly influenced by nitrogen dose and seen higher in recommended dose of nitrogen. Establishment methods had no significant effect on grain yield but straw yield was significantly higher in ZT-DSR but harvest index was seen higher in Pu-TPR. Grain yield and straw yield were significantly higher in residue applied treatment and recommended nitrogen but harvest index was higher in farmers-nitrogen dose.

🔖

Cite This Article

BASTOLA, A., KARKİ, T., MARAHATTA, S., AMGAİN, L. P. (2020). Tillage, Crop Residue and Nitrogen Management Effects on Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Rice. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 610–615. https://ajindex.com/articles/330928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adhikari BN, Joshi BP, Shrestha J, Bhatta NR. 2018. Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation among yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1(1): 149-160.
  2. Alam MM, Ali MH, Amin AKMR, Hasanuzzaman M. 2009. Yield attributes, yield and harvest index of three irrigated rice varieties under different levels of phosphorus. Advances in biological research, 3(3-4): 132-139.
  3. Arshadullah M, Ali A, Hyder SI, Khan AM. 2012. Effect of wheat residue incorporation along with nitrogen starter dose on rice yield and soil health under saline sodic soil. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 22(3), 753-757. http://thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-22-3/39.pdf
  4. Devkota S, Panthi S, Shrestha J. 2019. Response of rice to different organic and inorganic nutrient sources at Parwanipur, Bara district of Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2(1): 53-59.
  5. Ehsanullah II, Ahmad ASHFAQ, Randhawa SA. 2000. Effect of direct seeding and transplanting methods on the yield and quality of fine rice Basmati-370. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 38: 547-550. Fageria NK. 2014. Nitrogen management in crop production. CRC press, 24-25. FAO. 2017. World food situation. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Gadal N, Shrestha J, Poudel MN, Pokharel B. 2019. A review on production status and growing environments of rice in Nepal and in the world. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4(1): 83-87.
  6. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons. Gurung DB, Bhandari B, Shrestha J, Tripathi MP. 2018. Productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by varieties and sowing dates. International Journal of Applied Biology, 2(2): 13-19
  7. Haque ME, Bell RW, Islam, MA, Rahman MA. 2016. Minimum tillage unpuddled transplanting: An alternative crop establishment strategy for rice in conservation agriculture cropping systems. Field crops research, 185: 31-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.018
  8. Hobbs PR, Singh Y, Giri GS, Lauren JG, Duxbury JM. 2002. Direct seeding and reduced tillage option in the rice-wheat systems of Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. In: Pandey S, Mortimer M, Wade L, Tuong TP, Lopez K, Hardy B. (Eds.), Direct seeding: research issues and opportunities. Philippines, International Rice Research Institute, 201-218.
  9. Karkee SS, Sah SK, Marhatta S, Dhakal S, Kandel M, Shrestha J. 2019. Nitrogen uptake and economics of black rice (Or