SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 9

Evaluation of the Energy Analyses of Wheat Production at the Geographical Regions of Turkey

Ebubekir ALTUNTAŞ
ENGİN ÖZGÖZ
MUSTAFA GÜZEL
Pages
2011–2016
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest energy use rate is fertilizer energy in total input energy of the wheat production for geographical regions of Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the energy analyses of wheat production were compared for various geographic regions as Central Anatolia, Black Sea, Mediterranean, Eastern Anatolia and the Marmara.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, the lowest specific energy was obtained in the Mediterranean/Adana region with 2.22 MJ kg-1, while the highest specific energy was obtained in the East Anatolia with 10.51 MJ kg-1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest energy use rate is fertilizer energy in total input energy of the wheat production for geographical regions of Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, the energy analyses of wheat production were compared for various geographic regions as Central Anatolia, Black Sea, Mediterranean, Eastern Anatolia and the Marmara. For this purpose, the data obtained from different studies conducted in these geographical regions were used. Five key indicators to assess the energy analyses in wheat production in the geographical regions of Turkey (energy profitability, specific energy, energy efficiency, energy use and net energy) were considered. As a result, the lowest specific energy was obtained in the Mediterranean/Adana region with 2.22 MJ kg-1, while the highest specific energy was obtained in the East Anatolia with 10.51 MJ kg-1. The lowest and highest energy use efficiency was obtained with 2.36 and 7.88 in the Black Sea/Samsun and East Anatolia/Erzurum region, respectively. The highest energy use rate is fertilizer energy in total input energy of the wheat production for geographical regions of Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNTAŞ, E., ÖZGÖZ, E., GÜZEL, M. (2020). Evaluation of the Energy Analyses of Wheat Production at the Geographical Regions of Turkey. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 9, 2011–2016. https://ajindex.com/articles/330922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonymous, 2019. Climate-Data.org. https://tr.climate-data.org/ (Accessed to web: 12.04.2019).Anonymous, 2020. Turkey maps. https://cloud.google.com/maps-platform (Accessed to web: 01.03.2020).
  2. Canakci M, Topakci M, Akinci I, Ozmerzi A. 2005. Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for AntalyaRegion, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 46: 655–666.
  3. Cicek A, Altıntas G, Erdal G.2011. Energy consumption patterns and economic analysis of irrigated wheat and rainfed wheat production: Case study for Tokat region, Turkey. Bulgarian Journal ofAgricultural Science 17(3): 378-388.
  4. Çarman K, Demir F, Gücan A, Topal A, Soylu S, Marakoğlu T, Akgün N. 2009. A Research on the application of direct seeding and conservation tillage in cereals and legumes agronomy. Tubitak Project No: 105 O 492, Konya. Erdal G, Esengun K, Erdal H, Gunduz O. 2007. Economic analysis of energy input in sugar beet production in the province of Tokat, Turkey, Energy 32: 35-41.
  5. Esengun K, Erdal G, Gunduz O, Erdal H. 2007. An economic analysis and energy use in stake tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey, Renewable Energy 32: 1873-81.
  6. Gözübüyük Z, Çelik ZA, Öztürk G, Demir OM, Adıgüzel C. 2012. Comparison of energy use efficiency of various tillage -seeding systems in production of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science 8(1): 25-34 (in Turkish). Gökdoğan O, Sevim B. 2016. Determination of energy balance of wheat production in turkey: a case study of Eskil district of Aksaray province. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 13(4): 36-43.
  7. Karaağaç HA, Aykanat S, Coşkun MA, Şimşek M. 2012. Energy balance of different sowing systems in wheat agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 27th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, 5-7 September 2012, Samsun-Turkey, pp. 169-173 (in Turkish). Mandal KG, Saha KP, Ghosh PK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK. 2002. Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-basedcrop production systems in central India. Biomass and Bioenergy 23: 337-345.
  8. Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. 2008. Energy use economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study; Ardabil province. Energy Conversion & Management 49: 3566-3570.
  9. Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi S S, Rafiee H. 2010. Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renewable Energy 35: 1071-1075.
  10. Singh MK, Pal SK, Thakur R, Verma UN. 1997. Energy input–output relationship of cropping systems. India