Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Determination of Yield and Botanical Composition of the Meadow and Grassland in Çolpan Village at the Shores of Lake Van

Pages
1215–1221
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that grassland area should be improved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out at the meadows and pastures in Çolpan village of Van province in 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, matter yield, botanical composition, plant covered area, rate of decreaser/increaser/invader species were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that grassland area should be improved.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was carried out at the meadows and pastures in Çolpan village of Van province in 2020. In the study, matter yield, botanical composition, plant covered area, rate of decreaser/increaser/invader species were determined. The Loop method was used to determine the botanical composition. In grassland area were identified 69 species belonging to 17 families. In meadow area were identified 20 species belonging to 6 families. The amount of Poaceae, Fabaceae and other families found in the grassland area were determined as 18.66%, 15.65%, and 65.69%, respectively. In the meadow area, the amount of Poaceae, Fabaceae and other families were determined as 67.50%, 15.0%, and 17.50%, respectively. Artemisia spicigera (4.74%) Taeniatherum caput-medusae (5.0%) Arenaria serpyllifolia (5.0%) Medicago monantha (5.92%) species were the most common species found in the grassland area. Hordeum brevisubulatum (25.5%), Bromus scoparius (16.75%), and Taraxacum androssovii (9.25%) species were the most common species found in the meadow area. According to the ratio of good plants, pasture was classified as poor pasture and meadow was in the moderate meadow class. Grassland and meadow matter yields were found to be 91.4 kg/da and 385.2 kg/da, respectively. In the grassland of Çolpan village, invader species were found to be dense. It was concluded that grassland area should be improved.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUŞ, M. M. (2021). Determination of Yield and Botanical Composition of the Meadow and Grassland in Çolpan Village at the Shores of Lake Van. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 1215–1221. https://ajindex.com/articles/330865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Açıkgöz E. 2001. Forage Crops. Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No:182, Bursa, pp. 575. Altın M, Tuna C, Gür M. 2010. Effects of Fertilizer Application on Forage Production and Botanical Composition of Floodplain and Steppe Rangelands of Tekirdağ. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 7 (2).191-198 Anonymous 2020. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs. General Directorate of Meteorology Van Meteorology Station Records. Anonymous 2017. Provincial Directorate of Food and Agriculture of the Republic of Turkey Records Arslan C,Tufan T. 2011.
  2. Determination of Herbage Yield, Nutrient Composition and Optimum Harvesting Date of Pastures in Kars District. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 6(2): 131-138
  3. Aydın A, Çaçan E, Başbağ M. 2014. Determination of The Botanical Composition of A Pasture in The Derik District of Mardin. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue(2): 1631-1637.
  4. Babalık AA, Kılıç K. 2015. A comprehensive approach of Botanical Compositions and Forage Yields in a Rangeland. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 10.(10) Babalık AA, Sarıkaya H. 2015. A research on the hay yield and botanical composition of the Zengi Rangeland in Isparta. Turkish Journal of Forestry (2): 96-101 Bakır Ö. 1987. Meadow-Pasture Management. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications. No: 992. pp. 362. Bakoğlu A, Koç A. 2002. The Conıparison of Some Soil and Plant of Characteristic in Grazed and Protected Range Sites I. Comparison of Plant Cover Characteristic. Fırat University Journal of Engineering Science. 14(1), 37-77.
  5. Bakoğlu A, Baykal H, Çatal Mİ. 2019. A Research on The Botanical Composition of Handüzü Plateau. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(9): 1339- 1343. Balabanlı C, Albayrak S, Türk M, Yüksel O. 2006. Some Toxic Plants Growing In Rangelands Of Turkey And Their Effects On Animals. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Foresty. Seri: A (2), 89-96.
  6. Başbağ M, Sayar MS, Aydın A, Hosgören H, Demirel R. 2015. Some agronomical and quality traits in nine vetch (Vicia ssp.) species cultivated in Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 2(1): 69–77.
  7. Beyiş ME, Sabancı CO. 2011. A Study on Botanical Composition and Hay Yield of Pastures in Gevaş District of Van. The Ninety Field Crops Congress of Turkey, Poster Papers. 12-15 September 2011. 2. Bursa/Turkey. Bilgen M, Özyiğit Y. 2005. Determination of Vegetation Characteris