Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 10

The Effects of Wintering in Different Climatic Regions of Turkey on Some Physiological Characteristic of Caucasian Honey Bee (Apis mellifera caucasica) Colonies

Pages
2139–2143
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And new research should be made by adding different species of honeybees for the performance of overwintering in different climates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted in two locations have different altitudes in the cities which have different climates as Ankara, Ordu, Erzurum, Mersin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the data analysis, it was obtained that the quantity of the stocked honey was not statistically significant by the region×altitude×year interaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And new research should be made by adding different species of honeybees for the performance of overwintering in different climates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was conducted in two locations have different altitudes in the cities which have different climates as Ankara, Ordu, Erzurum, Mersin. The purpose of this work was to define some physiological properties of the bees such as the survivability of colony, wintering ability, usage of stoked honey and to discuss all these data. This study lasted two years and the second year was the continuation of the first year. At the beginning of the year, colonies which has the same genotype were equalized as number of combs covered with bees, stocked honey and brood areas and so on. According to the data analysis, it was obtained that the quantity of the stocked honey was not statistically significant by the region×altitude×year interaction. However, year×region and region×altitude interactions were statistically significant. Similarly, it was obtained that the wintering ability was not statistically significant by the region×altitude×year interaction. The only year×region interaction was statistically significant. Also, descriptive statistics obtained for the survivability of the colonies (%) during the first and second year was added statistically to this application. As a result, this work showed that migratory beekeepers could reevaluate the regions which have the microclimate properties in Aegean, Mediterranean, and the Black Sea. And new research should be made by adding different species of honeybees for the performance of overwintering in different climates.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTÜRK, S., KABAKCI, D., AKDENİZ, G., ARICI, Y., KUVANCI, A. (2020). The Effects of Wintering in Different Climatic Regions of Turkey on Some Physiological Characteristic of Caucasian Honey Bee (Apis mellifera caucasica) Colonies. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 10, 2139–2143. https://ajindex.com/articles/330858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akdeniz G, Aktürk S, Kabakçı D, Karataş Ü, Kuvancı A. 2014. Effects of Sudden Temperature Change on Overwintering of Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies. 12th Asian Apicultural Association Conference. Program book. page:12. Antalya, Turkey Akyol E, Yeninar H, Şahinler N, Güler A. 2006. The Effects of Additive Feeding and Feed Additives Before Wintering on Honey Bee Colony Performances, Wintering Abilities and Survival Rates at The East Mediterranean Region. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs. 2006.589.592. Arslan S, Güler A, Çam HM. 2004. Determination of The Wintering Ability Comb Honey Yield of The Different Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes in Tokat Region. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Uni. 21: 85–90. Available from: http://ziraat.gop.edu.tr/fkdergi.asp [Accessed: 19 April 2012].
  2. Cengiz MM, Erdoğan, Y. 2017. Comparison of wintering ability and colony performances of different honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes in Eastern Anatolian/Turkey conditions. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 23(6):865-870. DOI:10.9775/kvfd.2017.17667 Cengiz MM. Dülger, C. 2018. Gezginci ve Sabit Arıcılık İşletmelerinde Kontrollü Şartlarda Yetiştirilen Ana Arılarla Oluşturulan Balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) Kolonilerinin Bazı Fizyolojik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 13(1): 19-27. DOI: 10.17094/ataunivbd. 309110 Dülger C. 1997. Determination of The Performances of Caucasian, Anatolian and Erzurum Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes in Erzurum Conditions and Their Morphological Characters. PhD Dissertation. A.U. Institute of Science, Department of Animal Husbandry, Erzurum, Turkey. Furgala B. 1997. Outdoor Wintering Productive Colonies. In: Graham, J.M (Editor). The Hive and The Honey Bee. p.829– 850. ISBN 13: 9780915698165. Genç F, Dülger C, Dodoloğlu A, Kutluca S. 1999. Comparison of Some Physiological Characteristics of Caucasian, Middle Anatolian and Erzurum Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 23: 645–650.
  3. Genç F, Kaftanoğlu O. 1993. Determination of Optimum Wintering Method of Honey Bee Colonies (Apis mellifera L.) in Erzurum Region. TÜBİTAK VHAG-868, Final Certificate, Erzurum, 1-47, 1993. Güler A. 2006. Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Ondokuz Mayıs University, Agricultural Faculty School Book, No:55, p54- 55, 278-280, Samsun. Güler A. 1999. The Study on Morphological and Physiological Characters Affecting The Productivity of Some Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes of Turkey. Turki