SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Determination of some Quality Characteristics in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes and Relationships between Characteristics

Sinem Tuğçe CİN
Nurdoğan TOPAL
Pages
130–136
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study was obtained from a part of the master’s thesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the important plants in terms of nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The yield and quality studies on chickpea, which has the highest production value among edible grain legumes, continue at full stem in our country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study was obtained from a part of the master’s thesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the important plants in terms of nutrition. The yield and quality studies on chickpea, which has the highest production value among edible grain legumes, continue at full stem in our country. When it comes to quality, certain consumer expectations such as protein content, cooking time and seed coat ratio dominate the quality improvement. This study was conducted according to the experimental designs of randomized blocks under the Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Uşak University and the laboratory conditions of Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University. In this study, a total of 30 chickpea genotypes were used, 13 of them have different varieties. Cooking Time (min), Water Absorption Index (%), Seed Coat Rate (%), Protein Rate (%) and Amylose Rate (%) values of the genotypes have been obtained. The statistically significant differences have been detected between the genotypes in terms of all parameters examined in the variance analysis conducted as a result of this study. Similarly, the result of this study has revealed the correlation between the properties. This study was obtained from a part of the master’s thesis.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİN, S. T., TOPAL, N. (2021). Determination of some Quality Characteristics in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes and Relationships between Characteristics. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 130–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/330773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akıncı C, Biçer BT, Eker S. 2017. Kışlık nohut hat ve çeşitlerinin değerlendirilmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(3): 355-364.
  2. Ali Q, Ahsan M, Khaliq I, Elahi M, Shahbaz M, Ahmed W, Naees M. 2011. Estimation of genetic association of yield and quality traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int Res J Plant Sci, 2(6): 166-169. Anonim. 2001. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü Tohumluk Tescil ve Sertifikasyon Merkezi Müdürlüğü Tarımsal Değerleri Ölçme Denemeleri Teknik Talimatı.3-4.
  3. Arslan U, Özçelik H, Yılmaz S. 2012. Seçilmiş bazı nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) hatlarının agronomik ve kalite özellikleri bakımından değerlendirilmesi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 1(1): 29-36. Aydoğan A. 2012. Geniş ve dar yapraklı Kabuli tip nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşit ve hatlarında verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara,1. Bayrak H. 2010. Konya ekolojisinde tarımı yapılan yerel nohut popülasyonları ve çeşitlerin tarımsal, teknolojik ve besinsel karakterlerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri ABD, Konya.37. Bayrak H, Önder M, Gezgin S. 2005. Bor uygulamasının nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) çeşitlerinde verim ve bazı verim unsurlarına etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(35): 66-74. Cengiz B. 2007. Sakarya ve Eskişehir lokasyonlarında yetiştirilen bazı kuru fasulye çeşitlerinin kalite özellikleri. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, 17-33.
  4. Çulha G, Bozoğlu H. 2017. Amazon ve Sırma börülce çeşitlerinin tane kalitesine farklı kültürel uygulamaların etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 20: 362-366. El-Adawy TA. 2002. Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) undergoing different cooking methods and germination. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 57: 83–97.
  5. Encan G, Kaya M, Çiftçi CY. 2005. Nohudun dünya ve Türkiye ekonomisindeki yeri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1): 19-29.
  6. Erbas Köse ÖD, Mut Z. 2020. Mineral Contents of Chickpea Cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) Grown at Different Locations of Turkey. Sains Malaysiana 49(2): 293-303.
  7. Erbas Köse ÖD, Mut Z. 2019. Determination of mineral content of chickpea varieties and lines grown in Turkey. DERIM, 36 (1): 73-78.FAO,2020. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC [Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2020].
  8. Gil J, Nadal S, Luna D, Moreno MT, Haro AD. 1996. Variability of some physico‐chemical charact