Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 8

Oil and Protein Stability in Some Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Genotypes

Pages
1368–1374
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that genotype selection by regions is important in terms of protein and oil ratio.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Crantz., which draws attention with its non-food use (biodiesel, animal feed etc.) against the increasing demand for oilseeds worldwide, is a good alternative plant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study, camelina genotypes of Turkey in 3 different locations (Ankara, Ankara, Eskisehir) to investigate the quality characteristics in terms of genotype environment interactions in unirrigated and unfertilized conditions. 36 different genotypes, purified lines by negative selection, were analysed with 3 standard genotypes with augmented trial design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that genotype selection by regions is important in terms of protein and oil ratio.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Camelina sativa L. Crantz., which draws attention with its non-food use (biodiesel, animal feed etc.) against the increasing demand for oilseeds worldwide, is a good alternative plant. It is important to identify suitable and stable genotypes for regions along with high protein and oil content. The purpose of this study, camelina genotypes of Turkey in 3 different locations (Ankara, Ankara, Eskisehir) to investigate the quality characteristics in terms of genotype environment interactions in unirrigated and unfertilized conditions. 36 different genotypes, purified lines by negative selection, were analysed with 3 standard genotypes with augmented trial design. Environmental (E), genotype (G) and G × E interactions, which are sources of variation for protein and oil content, have been shown to be important. Oil and protein content were found ranged from 34.35%-37.88% and 25.76%-27.64% respectively. We have obtained important findings in our study to see the performance of Camelina sativa, and the possibility of alternative oil plants for these regions. İn terms of correlation of protein ratio and oil ratio, genotypes with high value that were least affected by each other were determined. The results showed that genotype selection by regions is important in terms of protein and oil ratio.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUBAŞI, İ., ARSLAN, Y., GÜLER, S., HATİPOĞLU, H., ABRAK, S., KÖSE, A. (2021). Oil and Protein Stability in Some Camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) Genotypes. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 8, 1368–1374. https://ajindex.com/articles/330731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ayerza R. 2009. The Seed’s protein and oil content, fatty acid composition, and growing cycle length of a single genotype of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) as affected by environmental factors. J. Oleo Sci. 58: 347–554. https://doi.org/10.5650/ jos.58.347 Berhow MA, Polat U, Glinski JA, Glensk M, Vaughn SF, Isbell T, Ayala-Diaz I, Marek L, Gardner C. 2013. Optimized analysis and quantification of glucosinolates from Camelina sativa seeds by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Ind. Crops Prod. 43: 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop. 2012.07.018 Bertrand M, Brühl L. 2001. Comparison of Different Methods for the Determination of the Oil Content in Oilseeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 78: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-001- 0226-y Canvin DT. 1965. The Effect of Temperature on the Oil Content and Fatty Acid Composition of the Oils From Several Oil Seed Crops. Can. J. Bot. 43: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1139/b65-008
  2. Crowley JG, Fröhlich A. 1998. Factors Affecting the Composition and Use of Camelina 1–23. Downey RK. 1971. Agricultural and genetic potentials of cruciferous oilseed crops. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 48: 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02638528
  3. Fröhlich A, Rice B. 2005. Evaluation of Camelina sativa oil as a feedstock for biodiesel production. Ind. Crops Prod. 21: 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.004
  4. Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim, T, Vural M, Babaç MT. 2012. Türkiye bitkileri listesi (damarlı bitkiler), Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. İstanbul.
  5. Gurmu F, Mohammed H, Alemaw G. 2010. Genotype X environment interactions and stability of soybean for grain yield and nutrition quality. African Crop Sci. J. 17. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v17i2.54202
  6. Ilker E, Kocaturk M, Kadiroglu A, Altinbas M, Yildirim A, Ozturk G, Yildiz H. 2018. Stability Analyses For Double Cropping In Soybean [(Glycine max L.) Merrill]. Turkish J. F. Crop. 80–84. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.467434
  7. Karvonen HM, Aro A, Tapola NS, Salminen I, Uusitupa MIJ, Sarkkinen ES. 2002. Effect of α-linolenic acid-rich Camelina sativa oil on serum fatty acid composition and serum lipids in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Metabolism. 51: 1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2002.35183
  8. Kaya Y, Akçura M, Taner S. 2006. GGE-Biplot Analysis of MultiEnvironment Yield Trials in Bread Wheat 30: 325–337.
  9. Korsrud GO, Keith MO, Bell JM. 1978. a Comparison of the Nutritional Value of Crambe and Camelina Seed Meals With Egg and Casein. Can. J. Anim. Sci.