SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Determination of Feed Value of Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) Hays Harvested in Different Maturation Periods

Farklı Olgunlaşma Dönemlerinde Hasat Edilen Nohut Geveni (Astragalus cicer L.) Otunun Besleme Değerinin Saptanması

AHMET UZATICI
Pages
745–752
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest feed value was determined in vegetative and flowering period (P<0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) harvested in different ripening periods, the chemical composition of the grass, the in vitro gas production, the metabolic energy (ME), the organic matter digestion (OMD) and the relative feed values (RFV).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In vitro gas production amounts of cicer milkvetch hays were determined at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours intervals and differences between incubation times were found to be significant (P<0.01).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest feed value was determined in vegetative and flowering period (P<0.01).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nohut geveni · kimyasal bileşim · Cicer milkvetch hay

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) harvested in different ripening periods, the chemical composition of the grass, the in vitro gas production, the metabolic energy (ME), the organic matter digestion (OMD) and the relative feed values (RFV). In vitro gas production amounts of cicer milkvetch hays were determined at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours intervals and differences between incubation times were found to be significant (P<0.01). In addition, the maturation of cicer milkvetch hays significantly affected the chemical composition of ME, OMD and RFV (P<0.01). Depending on the development period, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents of cicer milkvetch hays were increased, crude protein (CP), ME, OMD and RFV decreased (P<0.01). As a result, the harvesting periods affected the feed value of cicer milkvetch hays. The highest feed value was determined in vegetative and flowering period (P<0.01).

Özet

Bu çalışma, farklı olgunlaşma dönemlerinde hasat edilen nohut geveni (Astragalus cicer L.) otunun kimyasal bileşimi, in vitro gaz üretimi, metabolik enerji (ME), organik madde sindirimi (OMS) ve nispi yem değerini (NYD) saptamak için yapılmıştır. Nohut geveni otlarının in vitro gaz üretim miktarları 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 ve 96 saat aralıklarla saptanmış ve inkübasyon süreleri arası farklılıklar önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.01). Ayrıca nohut geveni otunun olgunlaşması sonucunda kimyasal bileşimler, ME, OMS ve NYD düzeyleri önemli derecede etkilemiştir (P<0.01). Gelişme dönemine bağlı olarak nohut geveni otlarının NDF, ADF ve ADL içerikleri artmış, ham protein, ME, OMS ve NYD ise azalmıştır (P<0.01). Sonuç olarak hasat dönemleri nohut geveni otlarının yem değerini etkilemiştir. En yüksek yem değerine sahip ot vejetatif ve çiçeklenme döneminde hasat edilenlerde saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZATICI, A. (2019). Determination of Feed Value of Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) Hays Harvested in Different Maturation Periods. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 745–752. https://ajindex.com/articles/330699

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharya, S.N., Kastelic, J.P., Beauchemin, K.A., Messenger, D.F. 2006. A review of research progress on cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.). Can. J. Plant Sci., 86: 49-62.
  2. Açıkgöz, E. 2001. Yem Bitkileri (3. Baskı). Uludağ Üni. Güçlendirme Vakfı Yay. No: 182, Bursa, 584 s. AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis (17th ed. 5th rev.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 930-954.
  3. Bolletta, A., Villalba, J., Dai, X., MacAdam, J. 2018. PSVIII-34 In vitro digestibility and fermentation kinetics of six irrigated forage hays in the US Intermountain. West. J. Anim. Sci., 96(3): 218-219.
  4. Bozkurt Kiraz, A. 2011. Determination of relative feed value of some legume hays harvested at flowering stage. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6(5): 525-530.
  5. Buxton, D.R. 1996. Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim Feed Sci. Tech., 59: 37-49.
  6. Canbolat, Ö., Sincik, M. 2007. Farklı olgunlaşma dönemlerinde hasat edilen kenaf çeşitlerinin (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) sindirim derecesi ve metabolik enerji değerlerinin in-vitro gaz tekniği ile belirlenmesi. IV. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi, 6-8
  7. Eylül, Van. Canbolat, O., Karaman, Ş. 2009. Bazı baklagil kaba yemlerinin in vitro gaz üretimi, organik madde sindirimi, nispi yem değeri ve metabolik enerji içeriklerinin karşılaştırılması. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2): 188-195.
  8. Canbolat, Ö. 2013. Farklı olgunlaşma dönemlerinin kolza otunun (Brassica napus L.) potansiyel besleme değeri üzerine etkisi. Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 60: 145-150.
  9. Dahlberg, E.M., Stern, M.D., Ehle, F.R. 1988. Effects of forage source on ruminal microbial nitrogen metabolism and carbohydrate digestion in continuous culture. J. Anita Sci., 66(8): 2071-2083.
  10. Davis, P.H. 1970. Flora of Turkey and East Egean Islands. Vol. 3, Edinburg Univ Press.
  11. Ensminger, M.E., Oldfield, J.E., Heinemann, W.W. 1990. Feed and Nutrition (2. ed.). The Ensminger Publishing Company, England, pp. 1280-1288.
  12. Figueiredo, M.V.B., Burity, H.A., Martinez, C.R., Chanway, C.P. 2008. Alleviation of drought stress in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by co-inoculation with Paenibacillus polymyxa and Rhizobium tropici. Appl. Soil Ecol., 40: 182-188.
  13. Hayat, R., Ali, S., Siddique, M.T., Chatha, T.H. 2008. Biological nitrogen fixation of summer legumes and their residual effects on subsequent rainfed wheat yield. Pak. J. Bot., 40(2): 711-722.
  14. Jeranyama, P., Garcia, A.D. 2004. Understanding Relative Feed Val