SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Hadfield Çeliğinin Tornalanmasında Kesme Parametrelerinin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Yanıt Yüzey Metodu ile Değerlendirilmesi

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CUTTING PARAMETERS ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS DURING THE TURNING OF HADFIELD STEEL WITH RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

ERGÜN EKİCİ
GÜLTEKİN UZUN
TURGAY KIVAK
Pages
19–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With respect to the effect on the surface roughness, the feed rate was followed by the cutting speed with a contribution ratio of 3.1% and the cutting depth with a contribution ratio of 1.7%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hadfield steel (X120Mn12) is widely used in the engineering applications due to its excellent wear resistance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiments were conducted at a cutting speed of 80, 110, 140 m/min, feed rate of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 mm/rev and depth of cut 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm, using coated carbide tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With respect to the effect on the surface roughness, the feed rate was followed by the cutting speed with a contribution ratio of 3.1% and the cutting depth with a contribution ratio of 1.7%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hadfield steel (X120Mn12) is widely used in the engineering applications due to its excellent wear resistance. In this study, the effects of the cutting parameters on the surface roughness were investigated in relation to the lathe process carried out on Hadfield steel. The experiments were conducted at a cutting speed of 80, 110, 140 m/min, feed rate of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 mm/rev and depth of cut 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm, using coated carbide tools. Regarding the evaluation of the machinability of Hadfield steel, a model was formed utilizing the response surface method (RSM). For the determination of the effects of the cutting parameters on the surface roughness, the central composite design (CCD) and variance analysis (ANOVA) were used. By means of the model formed as a result of the experimental study, it was demonstrated that among the cutting parameters, the feed rate is the most effective parameter on the surface roughness, with a contribution ratio of 90.28%. It was determined that the surface roughness increases with increasing feed rate. With respect to the effect on the surface roughness, the feed rate was followed by the cutting speed with a contribution ratio of 3.1% and the cutting depth with a contribution ratio of 1.7%.

Özet

Hadfield çeliği (X120Mn12) sahip olduğu mükemmel aşınma direncinden dolayı mühendislik uygulamalarında yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Hadfield çeliğinin tornalanmasında kesme parametrelerinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Deneyler 80, 110, 140 m/dak kesme hızı, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 mm/dev ilerleme ve 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm kesme derinliğinde kaplamalı karbür takımlar kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Halfield çeliğinin işlenebilirliğinin değerlendirilmesinde yanıt yüzey yöntemi (RSM) kullanılarak bir model oluşturulmuştur. Kesme parametrelerinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesinde merkezi tümleşik tasarım (CCD) ve varyans analizi (ANOVA) kullanılmıştır. Deneysel çalışma sonrasında oluşturulan modelle, yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerinde kesme parametrelerinden ilerlemenin % 90,28 katkı oranı ile en etkili parametre olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. İlerlemenin artmasıyla yüzey pürüzlülüğünün arttığı görülmüştür. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerinde etki bakımından ilerlemeyi % 3,12 katkı oranı ile kesme hızı, % 1,7 katkı oranı ile de kesme derinliği takip etmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİCİ, E., UZUN, G., KIVAK, T. (2014). Hadfield Çeliğinin Tornalanmasında Kesme Parametrelerinin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Yanıt Yüzey Metodu ile Değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 19–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/330059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Baş, D., İsmail, Boyacı, H., (2008). Modeling and Optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 836–845
  2. Bhattacharya, B. and Sorkhel, SK. (1999). Investigation for controlled electrochemical machining through response surface methodology based approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 86, 200–207
  3. Canadinc, D., Sehitoglu, H., Maier, H.J., Chumlyakov, Y.I., (2005). Strain hardening behavior of aluminum alloyed Hadfield steel single crystals, Acta Materialia, 53, 1831– 1842Maratray, F. (1995) High Carbon Manganese Austenitic Steels. The International Manganese Institute
  4. Chiang, K.T. and Chang, F.P. (2007). Analysis of shrinkage and warpage in an injectionmolded part with a thin shell feature using the response surface methodology, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 35, 468–479
  5. Choudhury, I.A. and El-Baradie, M.A. (1997). Surface roughness in the turning of highstrength steel by factorial design of experiments, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 67, 55–61
  6. Collette, G., Crussard, C., Kohn, A., Plateau, J., Pomey, G., Weisz, M., (1957). Contribution à ´létude des transformations des austénites à 12% Mn, Revue de Métallurgie LIV, 6, 433– 481
  7. Davim, J.P. (2003). Design of optimisation of cutting parameters for turning metal matrix composites based on the orthogonal arrays, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 132, 340–344
  8. Deniz, T.Ç., Çoğun, Ç., Özgedik, A., (2005). Elektro Erozyon İle İşlemede İşleme Parametrelerinin Matematiksel Modellenmesi, Makina Tasarım ve İmalat Dergisi, 7, 11
  9. Dhanasekar, B. and Ramamoorthy, B. (2010). Restoration of blurred images for surface roughness evaluation using machine vision, Tribology International, 4, 3268–276
  10. Gavriljuk, V.G., Tyshchenko, A.I., Razumov, O.N., Petrov, Y., Shanina, B.D., Berns, H., (2005). Corrosion-resistant analogue of Hadfield steel, Materials Science and Engineering, 420, 47–54
  11. Godfrey, C.O. and Kumar, S. (2006). Response surface methodology-based approach to CNC drilling operations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 171, 41–47
  12. Grum, J. and Slabe, J.M. (2006). The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni–Co– Mo surfaced layers, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155–156, 2026–2032
  13. Gunaraj, V. and Murugan, N. (1999). Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead q