Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD

Yeni Bir Çevre Yönetim Sistemi Aktiviteleri Grubunun Bulanık TOPSIS Metodu ile Önceliklendirilmesi

Pages
341–360
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An approach for determining prioritized activities was developed from the created activity list according to the evaluation criteria appropriate to the operating conditions of enterprises.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environmental Management System (EMS) studies conducted today are activities where enterprises plan, implement, control and monitor measures related to their activities that can impact the environment, and systematically and sustainably carry out activities aimed at preserving the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given the limited resources of enterprises such as workforce, money, time, machinery and equipment, it is important for enterprises to prioritize their activities so that EMS’s work effectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An approach for determining prioritized activities was developed from the created activity list according to the evaluation criteria appropriate to the operating conditions of enterprises.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevre Yönetim Sistemi · E-FMEA · Bulanık TOPSIS

Abstract

Environmental Management System (EMS) studies conducted today are activities where enterprises plan, implement, control and monitor measures related to their activities that can impact the environment, and systematically and sustainably carry out activities aimed at preserving the environment. Given the limited resources of enterprises such as workforce, money, time, machinery and equipment, it is important for enterprises to prioritize their activities so that EMS’s work effectively. In this study, a list of environmental activities was primarily established with the aim of determining the EMS activities to be undertaken by enterprises or evaluating existing environmental activities. An approach for determining prioritized activities was developed from the created activity list according to the evaluation criteria appropriate to the operating conditions of enterprises.

Özet

Günümüzde yürütülen çevre yönetim sistemi (ÇMS) çalışmaları, işletmelerin çevreyi etkileyebilecek faaliyetleriyle ilgili önlemlerini planladığı, uyguladığı, kontrol ettiği ve izlediği, sistemli ve sürdürülebilir bir şekilde çevreyi korumaya yönelik faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirdikleri çalışmalardır. İşletmelerin iş gücü, para, zaman, makine-ekipman gibi kısıtlı kaynakları göz önünde bulundurulduğunda çevre yönetim sistemi çalışmalarını etkin yürütebilmek için hangi faaliyetlerin önceliklendirilmesi gerekliliği önemli olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada öncelikli olarak, işletmelerin kuracakları çevre yönetim sistemi faaliyetlerini belirleme veya mevcut çevresel faaliyetlerini gözden geçirme amacı ile bir çevresel faaliyet listesi oluşturulmuştur. Oluşturulan faaliyet listesinden, işletme koşullarına uygun değerlendirme kriterlerine göre öncelikli faaliyetlerin belirlenmesi konusunda bir yaklaşım geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, U., GÜRTUNA, F. (2020). PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 341–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/329719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aung, T. S., Luan, S., Xu, Q. (2019) Application of multi-criteria decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar, Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 733-745.
  2. Amores-Salvado, J., Castro, G.M., Navas-López, J.E. (2015) The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 96, 288-297.
  3. Balana, B.B., Mathijs, E., Muys, B. (2010) Assessing the sustainability of forest management: An application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in Northern Ethiopia, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1294-1304.
  4. Chung, C., Hsieh, Y., Lin, H.C. (2019) Fuzzy inference system for modeling the environmental risk map of air pollutants in Taiwan, Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 808-820.
  5. Daddi, T., Testa, F., Frey, M., Iraldo, F. (2016) Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study, Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 647-656.
  6. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Stojanovic, T.A., Wooldridge, C., Casal, J. (2005) A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 866-874.
  7. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Rosario Ramos, M., Azeiteiro, M. (2012) Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions-Top Down versus participatory approaches, Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80-90.
  8. Erdas, C., Fokaides, P.A., Charalambous, C. (2015) Ecological footprint analysis based awareness creation for energy efficiency and climate change mitigation measures enhancing the environmental management yystem of Limassol Port, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 716-724.
  9. Feng, T., Cai, D., Wang, D., Zhang, X. (2016) Environmental management systems and financial performance: the Joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 78