Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 5

ORIGIN OF ETHNIC RELATIONS BETWEEN OGUZS AND KYRGYZ

Pages
359–373
Publication Date
2015-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, the history of inter-ethnic relations of these two Turkic peoples in the lights of folkloric and ethnographic materials intended to take into the consideration wihtin this paper

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While investigating ethnic origins of peoples, the study of ethno-folkloric materials and genealogy plays an important role.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Geneological data also shows widely that the history of the ancient Kyrgyz People displayed in the sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, the history of inter-ethnic relations of these two Turkic peoples in the lights of folkloric and ethnographic materials intended to take into the consideration wihtin this paper
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kyrgyz · Kyrk Oguz · Ashina

Abstract

While investigating ethnic origins of peoples, the study of ethno-folkloric materials and genealogy plays an important role. Geneological data also shows widely that the history of the ancient Kyrgyz People displayed in the sources. For instance, firstly in the materials of III.-V. centuries and then in Chinese sources there is a possible ethnic relations among the Kyrgyz-Tie- le- (Oguz)-Turks. Here Ting- lings should seems to be mixed with Kyrgyzes. This situation carries importance in terms of ethno-cultural relationship between Hsie-yen-t‟uo and Kyrgyz people. Hsie-yen-t‟uo is a group within the Ting Lings. In the ethnic construction of Kyrgyz people, the influence of Oghuz tribes should play a signficant role because, these cases also was reflected in the traditional genealogy which mentioned above. In this regard, the history of inter-ethnic relations of these two Turkic peoples in the lights of folkloric and ethnographic materials intended to take into the consideration wihtin this paper

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCOBEKOV, M. (2015). ORIGIN OF ETHNIC RELATIONS BETWEEN OGUZS AND KYRGYZ. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 5, 359–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/3290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Aristov, N. A.,” Zametki ob etniçeskom sostave tyurkskih plemen i narodnostey i svedeniya ob ih çislennosti”, Jivaya starina, vıp. 3-4, M-L. 1896. Bartold, V. V., “Kirgizı: İstoriçeskiy oçerk”, Soçineniya, II/2, Moskva 1963.
  2. Bartold, V. V., “İzvleçeniye iz soçineniya Gardizi “Zayn al-ahbar”, Prilojeniye k Otçetu o poezdke v Srednyuyu Aziyu s nauçnoy tselyu 1893-1894 gg.”, Soçineniya, VIII, Moskva 1973.
  3. Bernştam, A. N., İstoriçeskoye proşloye kirgizskogo naroda, Frunze 1942.
  4. Biçurin, N. Ya., Sobraniye svedeniy o narodah, obitavşih v Sredney Azii v drevniye vremena, I, Moskva- Leningrad 1950.
  5. Borovkova, L. A., Zapad Tsentral‟noy Azii vo II v do ne. – VII v n.e. (istoriko-geografiçeskiy obzor po drevnekitayskim istoçnikam), Moskva 1989.
  6. Borovkova, L. A., Tsarstva “zapapdnogo kraya” vo II-I vekah do n.e. (Vostoçnıy Turkestan i Srednyaya Aziya po svedeniyam “Şi tszi” i “Han şu”), Moskva 2001. Vostoçnıy Turkestan glazami russkih puteşestvennikov, Alma-Ata 1988. Vostoçnıy Turkestan v drevnosti i rannem srednevekovye, Moskva 1992.
  7. Grumm-Grjimaylo G. E., Zapadnaya Mongoliya i Uryanhayskiy kray. İstoriçeskiy oçerk etih stran v svyazi s istoriey Sredney Azii, II, Leningrad 1926.
  8. Evtyuhova, L. A., Arheologiçeskiye pamyatniki yeniseyskih kırgızov (hakasov), Abakan 1948.
  9. Eremeev, D. E., “Tyurk-etnonim iranskogo proishojdeniya (K probleme etnogeneza drevnih tyurkov)”, Sovyetskaya etnografiya, Nu: 3, 1949.
  10. Karatayev, O., “Kırgız-oguz tarıhıy-etnikalık baylanıştarı”, Kırgız-Türk Manas universiteti Koomduk ilimder jurnalı, Nu.: 1, Bişkek 2001.
  11. Kiselev, S. V., Drevnyaya istoriya Yujnoy Sibiri, Moskva 1951.
  12. Klyaştornıy, S. G., “Problemı ranney istorii plemeni Turk Aşina”, Mat. İssled. po arheologii SSSR, Nu.: 130, 1965.
  13. Klyaştornıy, S. G. – Livşits, V. A., “Sogdiyskaya nadpis iz Buguta”, Stranı i narodı Vostoka, Nu.: 10, 1970.
  14. Klyaştornıy, S. G. – Savinov, D. G., Stepnıye imperii drevney Evrazii, SPb. 2005.
  15. Klyaştornıy, S. G. – Savinov, D. G., “Drevnetyurkskiye etnopolitiçeskoye obedineniya i ih rol v etnogeneze Sredney Azii i Kazahstana”, Problemı etnogeneza i etniçeskoy istorii narodov Sredney Azii i Kazahstana, Moskva 1990.
  16. Kızlasov, L. R., İstoriya Yujnoy Sibiri v sredniye veka: Uçeb. Posobiye dlya stedentov vuzov, Moskva 1984.
  17. Kocobekov, M., Tarıhıy ulamış, salttuu sancıradagı kırgız etnogoniyası, Kırgız-Türk Manas universiteti Koomduk ilimder jurnalı, Nu.: 1, 2001.
  18. Kononov, A. N., “Opıt analiza termina turk”, Sovyetskaya etnografiya, 1949.
  19. Nesterov, S. P., “Proishojdeni