Journals / Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Treated with the Standard Protocol: Observational Results of Five Intensive Care Units

Standart Protokol ile Tedavi Edilen COVID-19 Pnömonisi Hastaları: Beş Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinin Gözlemsel Sonuçları

Pages
1–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, when the causes of mortality and morbidity were evaluated, good observation of neurological, infective, respiratory, and immune complications may be considered the main factor in reducing mortality and should be included in the guideline.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:T Objective: The number of patients with COVID-19 has rapidly increased, thereby exceeding the capacities of health systems and causing serious losses in affected countries because of the rapid spreading potential, high virulence, and lack of vaccine and proven antiviral therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This may indicate the importance of protocol-based treatments in maintaining the treatment process accurately, with minimal errors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, when the causes of mortality and morbidity were evaluated, good observation of neurological, infective, respiratory, and immune complications may be considered the main factor in reducing mortality and should be included in the guideline.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

T Objective: The number of patients with COVID-19 has rapidly increased, thereby exceeding the capacities of health systems and causing serious losses in affected countries because of the rapid spreading potential, high virulence, and lack of vaccine and proven antiviral therapy. This may indicate the importance of protocol-based treatments in maintaining the treatment process accurately, with minimal errors. This study aimed to present the results of a protocol-based treatment prepared in accordance with the “Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 treatment guideline.” Materials And Methods: This retrospective and prospective study used data of five hospitals. Intensive care and treatment approaches were carried out in accordance with the “COVID-19 approach protocol” prepared according to the “Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 treatment guideline.” Results: A total of 1143 patients admitted to five hospitals were hospitalized with a prediagnosis of COVID-19, and 115 patients needed intensive care. Among them, patients without COVID-19 were excluded and the remaining 77 patients were evaluated. In this study, 9 (11.7%) of the 77 patients were lost. While the mortality rate did not differ by sex (p=0.661), the mean age of deceased patients was significantly higher (p=0.006). Considering their comorbidities, the mortality rates of patients with hypertension, chronic renal failure, and cancer were significantly higher (p=0.034, p=0.014, and p=0.007, respectively). Conclusion: The mortality rate in this series may suggest that the treatments performed in line with the “Survival in Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 treatment guideline” are useful. However, when the causes of mortality and morbidity were evaluated, good observation of neurological, infective, respiratory, and immune complications may be considered the main factor in reducing mortality and should be included in the guideline.

Özet

Amaç: Koronavirüs hastalığı-2019 (COVID-19), hızlı yayılma potansiyeli, yüksek virülansı, henüz bir aşının ve etkisi kanıtlanmış bir antiviral tedavinin olmaması nedeniyle etkilediği ülkelerde hasta sayısında hızlı artışa, sağlık sistemlerinin kapasitelerinin aşılmasına ve ciddi kayıplara sebep olmuştur. Bu da bize, tedavi sürecinin doğru ve en az hatayla sürdürülebilmesi için, protokol bazlı tedavilerin önemli olabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Bu çalışmada “Sepsiste Sağkalım Kampanyası (SSC) COVID-19 Tedavi Kılavuzu” ile uyumlu hazırlanan protokol bazlı tedavinin sonuçlarının paylaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamız, beş hastanenin verilerinin retrospektif ve prospektif olarak kaydedilmesi şeklinde yapılmıştır. Yoğun bakıma (YB) alınma ve tedavi yaklaşımları SSC COVID19 Tedavi Kılavuzu’na göre hazırlanan, “COVID-19 yaklaşım protokolü” doğrultusunda yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Beş hastaneye başvuran toplam 1.143 hasta COVID-19 ön tanısıyla yatırılarak tedavi altına alınmış olup, 115 hastanın YB ihtiyacı olmuştur. Bunlar içerisinden COVID-19 olmayan hastalar çıkarılmış ve dışlama kriterleri uygulanmış kalan 77 hasta değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Çalışmaya dahil edilen 77 hastadan dokuzu (%11,7) kaybedilmiştir. Hastaların mortalitelerinde cinsiyete göre fark görülmezken (p=0,661), mortal seyreden olguların yaş ortalamalarının anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğu görülmüştür (p=0,006). Komorbiditelerine bakıldığında hipertansiyon, kronik böbrek yetmezliği ve kanser tanısı bulunan hastaların mortaliteleri anlamlı olarak yüksek saptanmıştır (p=0,034; p=0,014; p=0,007). Sonuç: Serimizdeki mortalite oranına baktığımızda “SSC COVID-19 Tedavi Kılavuzu” doğrultusunda yapılan tedavilerin yararlı olduğunu söyleyebiliriz, ancak mortalite ve morbidite nedenleri ile değerlendirme yaptığımızda, nörolojik, enfektif, solunumsal ve immüniteye ait komplikasyonların iyi gözlemlenmesinin mortalitenin azaltılmasında ana etken olduğunu ve bunun da kılavuza dahil edilmesi gerektiğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, H. S. D., MAMMADOV, O., DOĞAN, L., SARIKAYA, Z. T., ÖZDEMİR, İ. K., RASİMOĞLU, S., JİMA, A. K., İLKSÖZ, A., GÜDÜK, D. E., KILINÇ, E., KIRAN, S. İ., ŞEKER, M., ZENGİN, R., KOCAGÖZ, A. S., YILDIRIM, M. Ş., DİNÇER, Ş. S., GÜLEK, F. E., İb, İ. (2020). Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Treated with the Standard Protocol: Observational Results of Five Intensive Care Units. Türk Yoğun Bakım Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 1–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/327671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727‐33
  2. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 2020;5:536-44
  3. World Health Organization. Rolling Updates on Coronavirus Disease (Covid19) Available from: URL: https://www. who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen 4. Spina S, Marrazzo F, Migliari M, Stucchi R, Sforza A, Fumagalli R. The response of Milan’s Emergency Medical System to the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Lancet 2020;395:e49-50
  4. Grasselli G, Pesenti A, Cecconi M. Critical Care Utilization for the COVID19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response. JAMA 2020;323:1545-6. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 13] 6. Xie J, Tong Z, Guan X, Du B, Qiu H, Slutsky AS. Critical care crisis and some recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:837-40
  5. Kluge S, Janssens U, Welte T, WeberCarstens S, Marx G, Karagiannidis C. German recommendations for critically ill patients with COVID-19. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2020:1-4. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 14] 8. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323:1239-42. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 24] 9. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20
  6. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-9. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 7] 11. Li X, Ma X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it “typical” ARDS? Crit Care 2020;24. [Published 2020 May 6] 12. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526-2533
  7. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Rossi S. COVID19 pneumonia: ARDS or not? Crit Care 2020;24
  8. Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb