SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Increasing the competitiveness of smes in the r & d activities: Bursa analysis

Kobi'lerin rekabet gücünü artırmada ar-ge faaliyetleri: Bursa analizi

Mehmet ÇINAR
SİMLA GÜZEL
FİLİZ GİRAY
MEHMET YÜCE
Pages
95–118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, firms with R & D activities they believe that their competitive advantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, raising competiveness of enterprises has been crucial subject influencing macroeconomic policie s for countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It would apply the form of survey including 52 questions for SEMs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, firms with R & D activities they believe that their competitive advantage.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, raising competiveness of enterprises has been crucial subject influencing macroeconomic policie s for countries. Nearly, in all countries, these activities are showed more important case for small and medium -sized (SMEs) enterprises. Research and development activity has been recognized as a fundamental power for productivity growth and competitive a t both the macro-and microeconomic levels. This paper is aimed to determine the improvement of small and medium-sized enterprises which are the one of the main tools helping raise competiviness of firms with Bursa ampiricial study as a sample for Turkey. It is presented suggestions based on finding of survey in the study. It would apply the form of survey including 52 questions for SEMs. Analyzing the results obtained, in general, firms' sales, profits and the increase in investments is creating a positive impact on the firms. The way to accomplish this is through R & D activities. In other words, firms with R & D activities they believe that their competitive advantage.

Özet

Günümüzde girişimcilerin rekabetini artırmak, ülkeler için makroekonomik politikaları etkileyen önemli bir konudur. Hemen hemen tüm ülkelerde önemli bir yere sahip olan Kobi’ler için ise çok daha önem arz etmektedir. Araştırma– Geliştirme (Ar-Ge) faaliyetleri, hem makro hem mikro düzeyde, verimlilik artışı ve rekabetin temel gücü olarak tanımlanmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı işletmelerin rekabet gücünü artırmada temel araçlardan biri olan Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinin Kobi’lerdeki gelişimini Türkiye örneği olarak Bursa ampirik çalışması ile belirlemektir. Bursa’daki Kobi’lere 52 sorudan oluşan bir anket formu uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar genel olarak incelendiğinde firmaların satış, kar ve yatırımlarında meydana gelen artışlar , firmalar üzerinde olumlu etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bunu gerçekleştirmenin yolu da Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinden geçmektedir. Diğer bir ifade ile firmalar Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinin kendilerine rekabet üstünlüğü sağlayacağını düşünmektedirler

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, M., GÜZEL, S., GİRAY, F., YÜCE, M. (2014). Increasing the competitiveness of smes in the r & d activities: Bursa analysis. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 95–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/326516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Acs, Zoltan J. (November/December, (1992), "Small Business Economics" Challenge, 35(6). Altın, Onur, Kaya, Ayşen (2009), “ Türkiye’de Ar -Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedense l İlişkinin Analizi”, Ege Akademik Bakış,9(1). Audretsch, David B. (2001), “Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support For Enrepreneurship, Industry and Innovation, 11(3). Baldwin, John, Gellatly, Guy (2003), Innovation Strategies and Perfor mance In Small Firms,Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Cameron, Gavin (1996), “Innovation and Economic Growth”, Centre For Economic Performance Discussion Paper,No.277. Ceylan, A. and T. Korkmaz, (2002) “SMEs Going Public and A Survey of Bursa Region”,21.Yüzyılda Kobi’ler: Sorunlar, Fırsatlar ve Çözüm ÖnerileriKonulu Sempozyum, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazi Magusa, TRNC, January 3-5.
  2. Coe, David T., Elhanan Helpman, Alexander W. Hoffmaister, (1995). “North -South R&D Spillovers”, NBER Working Paper, No. 5048, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research). Cohen, W. M, & Kleppe, S. (1996) “A reprise of size and R&D”, The Economic Journal, 106. European Commission,(2009),
  3. European SMEs Under Pressure, Annual Report on EU Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises. Griffith, Rachel, Redding, Stephen, and Reenen, John Van (2001), “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Countries,” The Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper, 02/00. Hall, Bronwyn H., Lotti, Francesca and Mairesse, Jacques (2008), “Innovation And Productivity in Smes: Empirical Evidence For Italy”, National Bureau of Economic Research,Working Paper 14594, Cambridge. İdris, Kamil (2003),Intellectual Property A Power Tool For Economic Growth,World Intellectual Property Organization, Second Edition,
  4. Geneva. Jovanovic, Boyan (2001), “New Technology and The Small Firm, Small Business Economics, 16 (1). Küçük, Orhan (2005),Girişimcilik ve Küçük İşletme Yönetimi, Seçkin Yayıncılık,Ankara. OECD, (2000), “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Local Strength, Global Reach”, Policy Brief. Ortega-Argiles, Raquel, Vivarelli, Voigt, Peter (2009), “R&D in SMEs: A Paradox?”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1. Özdemir, Süleyman, Ersöz, H. Yunus, Sarıoğlu, İbrahim (2006), İşsizlik Sorunun Çözümünde Kobi’lerin Desteklenmesi, İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları, No.2006-45,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Prochazka, Lukas (2011), “Raising Competitiviness of Chech SMES -Analysis of R & D Supporting Programmes”, International Journal of Busine