Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

The Production of Bread with Chickpea Ferment and Dominant Microflora

Nohut Mayalı Ekmek Üretimi ve Hakim Mikroflora

Pages
89–99
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, in production of bread with chickpea ferment, not only lactic acid bacteria and yeast played an important role but also probability of presence of Bacillus and Clostridium species from spore forming bacteria was supported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it was aimed production of bread with chickpea ferment and determination of dominant microflora during fermentation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the production of bread with chickpea ferment, production of fermented chickpea medium was first occurred by using type of Mexico chickpea and then dough with chickpea ferment were made.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, in production of bread with chickpea ferment, not only lactic acid bacteria and yeast played an important role but also probability of presence of Bacillus and Clostridium species from spore forming bacteria was supported.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study it was aimed production of bread with chickpea ferment and determination of dominant microflora during fermentation. For the production of bread with chickpea ferment, production of fermented chickpea medium was first occurred by using type of Mexico chickpea and then dough with chickpea ferment were made. Microbiological analysis and pH in chickpea ferment medium and dough were determined. Dominant microflora in chickpea ferment medium and dough was found as lactic acid bacteria, yeast, aerobe spore bacteria and anaerobe spore bacteria. A drop in pH was observed due to metabolic activity of dominant microflora. As a result, in production of bread with chickpea ferment, not only lactic acid bacteria and yeast played an important role but also probability of presence of Bacillus and Clostridium species from spore forming bacteria was supported.

Özet

Bu çalışmada nohut mayalı ekmek üretimi ve fermantasyonda ortama hakim olan mikrofloranın belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Nohut mayalı ekmek üretimi için öncelikle Meksika çeşidi nohut kullanılarak fermente nohut mayası üretimi gerçekleştirilmiş ve ardından bu maya ile nohut mayalı hamur elde edilmiştir. Nohut mayasında ve hamurunda mikrobiyolojik analizler ve pH tayini yapılmıştır. Nohut mayasında ve hamurunda hakim mikroflora; laktik asit bakterisi, maya, aerob spor yapan bakteri ve anaerob spor yapan bakteri olarak belirlenmiştir. Ortama hakim mikrofloranın metabolik aktivitesi ile pH değerinde düşüş gözlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak nohut mayalı ekmek üretiminde sadece maya ve laktik asit bakterilerinin rol oynamadığı yanı sıra aerob spor ve anaerob spor yapan Bacillus ve Clostridium türlerinin bulunma ihtimalinin de olduğu desteklenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGİNKAYA, Z., TURHAN, E. Ü., ÖZER, E. A. (2016). The Production of Bread with Chickpea Ferment and Dominant Microflora. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 89–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/325836

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aguilar, N., E. Albanell, B. Minarro ve M. Capellas. 2015. Chickpea and tiger nut flours as alternatives to emulsifier and shortening in gluten-free bread. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 62: 225-232.
  2. Angulo-Bejarano, P., N.M. Verdugo-Montoya, E.O. Cuevas-Rodriguez, J. Milan-Carrillo, R. MoraEscobedo, J.A. Lopez-Valenzuela, J.A. Garzon-Tiznado, C. Reyes-Moreno. 2008. Tempeh flour from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) nutritional and physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry, 106: 106–112.
  3. Arda, Ş. ve A. Aydın. 2011. Hammadde kalitesi ile bazı hijyen parametrelerinin yufkanın mikrobiyolojik kalitesi arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 37 (2): 135-147.
  4. Cebi, K. 2009. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from chickpea yeast and dough. Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, MSc thesis, p 60. Dikkaya, F. 2011. Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi’nde Simit ve Simitçiler. Millî Folklor, Yıl 23, Sayı 92. Gòmez, M., B. Oliete, C.M. Rosell, V. Pando and E. Fernàndez. 2008. Studies on cake quality made of wheat-chickpea flour blends. LWT Food Sci.Technol., 41: 1701–1709.
  5. Halkman, A.K. 2005. Gıda Mikrobiyolojisi Uygulamaları. Başak Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti. 358. Hatzikamari, M., N. Kyriakidis, N. Tzanetakis, C.G. Biliaderis and E.L. Tzanetaki. 2007a. Biochemical changes during a submerged chickpea fermentation used as a leaving agent for bread production. Eurepean Food Research Technology, 224: 715-723.
  6. Hatzikamari, M., M. Yiangou, N. Tzanetakis and E. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki. 2007b. Changes in numbers and kinds of bacteria during a chickpea submerged fermentation used as a agent for bread production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 116: 37-43.
  7. Katsaboxakis, K. and K. Mallidis. 1996. The microflora of soak water during natural fermentation of coarsely ground chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 23: 261 -265. Ma, Z., J.I. Boye, B.K. Simpson, S.O. Prasher, D. Monpetit and L. Malcolmson. 2011. Thermal processing effects on the functional properties and microstructure of lentil, chickpea,and pea flours. Food Research International, 44: 2534–2544.
  8. Mohammed, I., A.R. Ahmed and B. Senge. 2012. Dough rheology and bread quality of wheat– chickpea flour blends. Ind. Crop. Prod. 36: 196–202.
  9. Ozer, E.A., Z. Erginkaya, S. Ozer and E. Unal. 2010. One of our traditional breads: Chickpea fermented bread. In: The 1st International Symposium on “Traditional Foods from Adriatic to Caucasus”. Tekirdag, Turkey