Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

The conservative management of abdominal injuries

Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı

Pages
153–157
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with clinical stability and normal physical examination findings can be treated nonoperatively with close monitoring

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Non-operative management of abdominal injuries has recently become more common.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the efficacy of non-operative treatment in abdominal trauma (blunt-penetrating) is discussed.Material and Methods: All patients who received treatment due to abdominal trauma from November 2008 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with clinical stability and normal physical examination findings can be treated nonoperatively with close monitoring
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Non-operative management of abdominal injuries has recently become more common. Especially nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal trauma is gaining wide acceptance. In this study, the efficacy of non-operative treatment in abdominal trauma (blunt-penetrating) is discussed.Material and Methods: All patients who received treatment due to abdominal trauma from November 2008 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic characteristics, type of injury, injured organ, type of treatment (operative vs. nonoperative) and mortality data were evaluated. Results: The study includes 115 patients treated for abdominal trauma at our clinics. The mechanism of trauma was; 60% stab wounds, 23.5% blunt abdominal trauma and 16.5% gunshot wounds. Forty-two patients (36.5%) were operated for hemodynamic instability and / or peritonitis on admission. The remaining 63.5% of patients (n=73) were treated nonoperatively, 10 of whom required laparotomy during follow-up. The remaining 63 patients were treated with non-operative management. The success rate for non-operative treatment was 86.3% and there was no difference in terms of the types of injuries. The mortality rate was 4.3% (n= 5) in the whole series, but there were no deaths among the patients who had received non-operative treatment. In the whole patient group 54.2% (n=63) were treated nonoperatively. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment in abdominal trauma is safe and effective. Patients with clinical stability and normal physical examination findings can be treated nonoperatively with close monitoring

Özet

Amaç: Son yıllarda karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi ön plana çıkmıştır. Özellikle künt karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi yaygın kabul görmektedir. Bu yazıda tüm karın travmalarında (künt-penetran) nonoperatif tedavinin etkinliği tartışılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Kasım 2008 ile Ocak 2013 tarihleri arasında karın travması nedeni ile takip ve tedavi edilen tüm hastalar retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, yaralanma tipi, yaralanan organ, tedavi şekli (operatif-nonoperatif) ve mortalite araştırılmıştır. Nonoperatif tedavinin etkinliğinin yüzde olarak verilmesi planlanmıştır. Bulgular: Kliniğimizde 115 hasta karın travması nedeni ile tedavi edilmiştir. Bu hastaların %60'ı (n=69) kesici delici alet yaralanması, %23,5'i (n=27) künt batın travması ve kalan %16,5'i (n=19) ise ateşli silah yaralanması idi. Hastaların %36,5'i (n=42) hastaneye kabullerinde hemodinamik instabilite ve/veya peritonit bulguları nedeni ile opere edildi. Kalan %63,5 hasta (n=73) nonoperatif olarak tedaviye alındı. Bu hastaların 10'una takipte laparotomi gerekti. Kalan 63 hasta nonoperatif tedavi ile takip edilmiştir. Nonoperatif tedavinin başarı oranı %86,3 olup yaralanma tipi ile tedavi başarısı arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Toplam 5 hastada (%4,3) mortalite görüldü ancak nonoperatif tedaviye alınan hiçbir hastada mortalite gözlenmedi. Tüm hastalar değerlendirildiğinde hastaların %54,2'si (n=63) nonoperatif olarak tedavi edilmiştir. Sonuç: Karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi etkili ve güvenlidir. Klinik ve muayene bulguları stabil olan hastalar yakın klinik takip ile nonoperatif olarak tedavi edilebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUŞ, A., SEVİNÇ, B., AY, A. S., ARSLAN, K., KARAHAN, Ö., ERYILMAZ, M. A. (2013). The conservative management of abdominal injuries. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 153–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/325758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Wiewióra M, Sosada K, Piecuch J, Zurawiński W. The role of lapa￾roscopy in abdominal trauma - review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne 2011; 6: 121-126
  2. Soreide K. Epidemiology of major trauma. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 697- 698 [CrossRef]
  3. Hady HR, Łuba M, Myśliwiec P, Trochimowicz L, Łukaszewicz J, Zu￾rawska J, et al. Surgical management in parenchymatous organ injuries due to blunt and penetrating abdominal traumas--the authors’ experience. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21: 193-200
  4. Mnguni MN, Muckart DJ, Madiba TE. Abdominal trauma in dur￾ban, South Africa: factors influencing outcome. Int Surg 2012; 97: 161-168. [CrossRef] 5. Gad MA, Saber A, Farrag S, Shams ME, Ellabban GM. Incidence, patterns, and factors predicting mortality of abdominal injuries in trauma patients. N Am J Med Sci 2012; 4: 129-134. [CrossRef] 6. Farrath S, Parreira JG, Perlingeiro JA, Solda SC, Assef JC. Predictors of abdominal injuries in blunt trauma. Rev Col Bras Cir 2012; 39: 295-301. [CrossRef] 7. Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, Crandall M, Friese R, Guillamon￾degui O, et al. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic in￾jury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73: 288- 293. [CrossRef] 8. van der Wilden GM, Velmahos GC, Emhoff T, Brancato S, Adams C, Georgakis G, et al. Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt liver injuries: a multicenter study of the rese￾arch consortium of new England centers for trauma. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 423-428. [CrossRef] 9. Lone GN, Peer GQ, Warn AK, Bhat AM, Warn NA. An experience with abdominal trauma in adults in Kashmir. JK Pract 2001; 8: 156 225-230
  5. Parray FQ, Wani ML, Malik AA, Thakur N, Wani RA, Naqash SH, et al. Evaluating a conservative approach to managing liver injuries in Kashmir, India. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011; 4: 483-487
  6. Swift C, Garner JP. Non-operative management of liver trauma. J R Army Med Corps 2012; 158: 85-95. [CrossRef] 12. Howes N, Walker T, Allorto NL, Oosthuizen GV, Clarke DL. Laparo￾tomy for blunt abdominal trauma in a civilian trauma service. S Afr J Surg 2012; 50: 30-32
  7. Parks NA, Davis JW, Forman D, Lemaster D. Observation for no￾noperative management of blunt liver injuries: how long is long enough? J Trauma 2011; 70: 626-629. [CrossRef] 14. Bhagvan S, Turai M, Holden A, Ng A, Civil I. Predicting hollow viscus injury in blunt abdominal trauma with computed tomog￾raphy. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1