Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

A retrospective analysis of 93 cases with anorectal abscess in a rural state hospital

Kırsal bir devlet hastanesinde anorektal apseli 93 olgunun geriye dönük incelenmesi

Pages
5–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

None of the variables evaluated were found to be significantly associated with the presence of recurrence.Conclusion: Variables such as age, gender, type of abscess, presence of fistula or drain usage were not associated with the development of recurrence in patients who underwent incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Anorectal abscess is a clinical condition frequently encountered in daily surgical practice and recurrences may occur despite treatment with adequate incision and drainage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary aim of this study was to analyze the variables that may have resulted in recurrent anorectal abscess, retrospectively.Material and Methods: Ninety-three patients out of 149 patients who underwent surgery for anorectal abscess at our center between 2011-2012 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:None of the variables evaluated were found to be significantly associated with the presence of recurrence.Conclusion: Variables such as age, gender, type of abscess, presence of fistula or drain usage were not associated with the development of recurrence in patients who underwent incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Anorectal abscess is a clinical condition frequently encountered in daily surgical practice and recurrences may occur despite treatment with adequate incision and drainage. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the variables that may have resulted in recurrent anorectal abscess, retrospectively.Material and Methods: Ninety-three patients out of 149 patients who underwent surgery for anorectal abscess at our center between 2011-2012 were included in this study. Data regarding age, gender, presence of recurrence, time to recurrence, abscess type, presence of fistula, fistula type, drain usage, length of hospital stay and follow-up duration were retrospectively recorded.Results: Patients were divided into two groups: the recurrence group and the treatment group. Eleven patients (11.8%) had a recurrence and the median time to recurrence was 3 months. None of the variables evaluated were found to be significantly associated with the presence of recurrence.Conclusion: Variables such as age, gender, type of abscess, presence of fistula or drain usage were not associated with the development of recurrence in patients who underwent incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess

Özet

Amaç: Anorektal apse günlük cerrahi pratikte sık karşılaşılan klinik bir durumdur ve rekürrens tedavide uygulanan yeterli insizyon ve drenaj sonrasında karşılaşılabilen bir olgudur. Bu çalışmanın birincil amacı, merkezimizde görülen tekrarlayıcı anorektal apselere neden olabilecek değişkenlerin geriye dönük olarak incelenmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Merkezimizde 2011-2012 yılları arasında anorektal apse nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 149 hastadan 93 hasta çalışmaya dâhil edilerek; yaş, cinsiyet, rekürrens varlığı, rekürrens zamanı, apse tipi, fistül varlığı, fistül tipi, dren kullanımı, takip ve yatış süreleri geriye yönelik incelendi.Bulgular: Hastalar rekürrens grubu ve tedavi grubu olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. On bir hastada (%11,8) rekürrens olduğu ve ortanca rekürrens gelişme zamanının 3 ay olduğu saptandı. İncelenen değişkenlerden hiç birinin rekürrens gelişimiyle anlamlı ilişkisi olmadığı görüldü.Sonuç: Anorektal apse nedeniyle insizyon ve drenaj uygulanan hastalarda yaş, cinsiyet, apse tipi, fistül varlığı ve dren kullanımı gibi değişkenlerin rekürrens gelişimiyle ilişkisi bulunmamıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAPULU, N., DERE, Ö., ZAİM, G., SOY, H. E. A., ÖZMEN, T., DOĞRUL, A. B. (2015). A retrospective analysis of 93 cases with anorectal abscess in a rural state hospital. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 5–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/325639

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Billingham RP, Isler JT, Kimmins MH, Nelson JM, Schweitzer J, Murphy MM. The diagnosis and management of common ano- rectal disorders. Curr Probl Surg 2004; 41: 586-645. [CrossRef] Polat C, Yazicioglu B. Anorektal apse ve fistüller. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2009; 2: 32-39. Yamaner YS. Perianal sepsis ve Fournier kangreni. Türkiye Klinik- leri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2010; 3: 44-47. Parks AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J 1961; 1: 463-469. [CrossRef] Malik AI, Nelson RL, Tou S. Incision and drainage of perianal abs- cess with or without treatment of anal fistula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD006827. Quah HM, Tang CL, Eu KW, Chan SY, Samuel M. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing drainage alone vs primary sphincter-cutting procedures for anorectal abscess-fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 602-609. [CrossRef] Sozener U, Gedik E, Kessaf Aslar A, Ergun H, Halil Elhan A, Memi- koglu O, et al. Does adjuvant antibiotic treatment after drainage of anorectal abscess prevent development of anal fistulas? A ran- domized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 923-929. [CrossRef] Uğur M, Tozlu G, Benzin F, Bülbül M. Sakral tüberküloza bağlı ola- rak gelişen tekrarlayan perianal apse olgusu. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2010; 20: 143-146.
  2. Sungurtekin U, Bolat H, Yılmaz S, Atalay AÖ, Sungurtekin H. Yu- tulmuş balık kılçığına bağlı olarak gelişen perianal apse olgusu. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2007; 17: 107-109. 7 Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rec- tum 1984; 27: 126-130. [CrossRef] Fazio VW. Complex anal fistulae. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987; 16: 93-114.
  3. Yano T, Asano M, Matsuda Y, Kawakami K, Nakai K, Nonaka M. Prognostic factors for recurrence following the initial drainage of an anorectal abscess. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 1495-1498. [CrossRef] Onaca N, Hirshberg A, Adar R. Early reoperation for perirectal abscess: a preventable complication. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1469-1473. [CrossRef] Cox SW, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mazier WP. Outcome after incision and drainage with fistulotomy for ischiorectal abscess. Am Surg 1997; 63: 686-689.
  4. Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E, Furst A, Sailer M, Schiedeck T. Ger- man S3 guideline: anal abscess. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 831-837. [CrossRef] Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, Tan AB. Perianal absces- ses and fistulas