Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Recurrent pilonidal disease surgery: Is it second primary or reoperative surgery?

Pages
162–167
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Re-flap surgery after any kind of relapse is well appreciated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) effects mainly young men's social and work life with frequent recurrence rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Surgeons may think that changing treatment strategy after recurrence may prevent further relapses of PSD.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Re-flap surgery after any kind of relapse is well appreciated
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) effects mainly young men's social and work life with frequent recurrence rate. Reoperation for unimproved or recurrent disease is somehow troublesome. Surgeons may think that changing treatment strategy after recurrence may prevent further relapses of PSD. We analyzed patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus to determine their predisposing features for recurrence and the outcomes of the preferred surgical methods.Material and Methods: From 2007 to 2012, out of 95 recurrent pilonidal sinus disease (rPSD) patients, 62 operated cases were included and examined retrospectively. Their retrospective data were examined for demographics, 1stand 2nd operation types, patient satisfaction and pain scores. For cases with insufficient preoperative or postoperative data, phone call and interviews were done to obtain data. Some were kindly invited to the outpatient examination. Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan Meier test for disease free survival time were used where appropriate. P values less than 0.05 were accepted to be statistically significant.Results: Total of 62 rPSD patients were examined. Male:female ratio was 2.9:1. The mean age after 1st and 2nd operations were 24.7 and 28.1 years, respectively. One and five-year recurrence rates were 33.9% and 66.1%, respectively. The mean interval between the 1st and 2nd operations was 45.6 months. Excision and midline closure was the most frequent type of operation followed by flap reconstructions and excision-lay open procedures. The 1st operation types of rPSD cases were different from that of 2nd operations. Pain perception and satisfaction scores were better in flap reconstruction groups. Conclusion: Reoperative surgery of rPSD is satisfactory with certain precautions. Relapses after flap reconstruction procedures with a well-being period should be referred as second primary disease. Changing surgical strategy is not always indicated as some patients with recurrence have relapsing or second primary disease that have distinct clinical course. Re-flap surgery after any kind of relapse is well appreciated

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAR, A. D., CARTI, E. B., OYMACI, E., SARI, E., YAKAN, S., YILDIRIM, M., ERKAN, N. (2016). Recurrent pilonidal disease surgery: Is it second primary or reoperative surgery?. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 162–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/325610

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Doll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, Dettmann H, Petersen S, Due- sel W. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pi- lonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1928-1934. [CrossRef] Doll D. 5- and 10-year recurrence rate is the new gold standard in pilonidal sinus surgery benchmarking. Med Princ Pract 2010; 19: 216-217. [CrossRef] Yoldas T, Karaca C, Unalp O, Uguz A, Caliskan C, Akgun E, et al. Recurrent pilonidal sinus: lay open or flap closure, does it differ? Int Surg 2013; 98: 319-323. [CrossRef] Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Simsek A, Unlu A, Tekin OF, Cetiner S, et al. Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol application and factors affecting the recurrence. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 21- 24. [CrossRef] Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Dasiran F. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap. Surgery 2003; 134: 745-749. [CrossRef] Cihan A, Ucan BH, Comert M, Cesur A, Cakmak GK, Tascilar O. Su- periority of asymmetric modified Limberg flap for surgical treat- ment of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 244-249. [CrossRef] Cihan A, Mentes BB, Tatlicioglu E, Ozmen S, Leventoglu S, Ucan BH. Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 238-242. [CrossRef] Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E, Akin M, Oguz M. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today 2004; 34: 419-423. [CrossRef] Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient charac- teristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10: 39-42. [CrossRef] Lesalnieks I, Furst A, Rentsch M, Jauch KW. Primary midline clo- sure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate. Chirurg 2003; 74: 461-468.
  2. Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, Durgun V. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6: 27- 32. [CrossRef] Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD006213. [CrossRef] Onder A, Girgin S, Kapan M, Toker M, Arikanoglu Z, Palanci Y, et al. Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complica- tions and recurrence. Int Surg 2012; 97: 224-229. [CrossRef] McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic