Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Surgical alternatives in acute intestinal obstructions due to colorectal malignancies

Akut barsak tıkanıklığına neden olan kolorektal tümörlerde cerrahi seçenekler

Pages
21–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Emergency resection with primary anastomosis in colorectal tumors can be performed with a low morbidity and mortality rates in selected patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Obstructing colorectal cancer is associated with a high operative mortality and a worse prognosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Age, sex, physical examination findings, diagnostic methods, interval between application and operation time, operative findings and tumor localization, surgical and anastomosis technique, localization of stomas, complications, intensive care and hospital stay and mortality rates of 27 patients were recorded by searching the patients' files.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Emergency resection with primary anastomosis in colorectal tumors can be performed with a low morbidity and mortality rates in selected patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Obstructing colorectal cancer is associated with a high operative mortality and a worse prognosis. The surgical management of these patients still remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate retrospectively our approach to the patients presented to our clinic for acute mechanic intestinal obstruction caused by colorectal malignancy, and to discuss treatment results. Material and Methods: Age, sex, physical examination findings, diagnostic methods, interval between application and operation time, operative findings and tumor localization, surgical and anastomosis technique, localization of stomas, complications, intensive care and hospital stay and mortality rates of 27 patients were recorded by searching the patients' files. Results: Our patients consisted of 18 males and 9 females with a median age of 53 (19-90). Abdominal distention and tenderness with palpation were the most frequent physical examination findings. All patients had plain abdominal graphy while abdominopelvic ultrasonography and/or colonoscopy were used only for suitable patients. Interval between application and operation time was 36 hours (24-72 h). The most frequent tumor localization was in sigmoid colon (9 patients, %33.3) Resection with primary anastomosis was the preferred approach in 19 patients (70%). Nine (47%) of anastomosis were made by hand and 8 of them made by stapler while in 2 patients combination of two techniques were used. In 7 patients who were not suitable for resection, a diverting stoma was constructed and in one patient an ileo-colonic by-pass was the of choice. Morbidity was seen in 7 patients (3 patients with resection with primary anastomosis, 4 patients with stoma) and 7 patients (26%) died in the postoperative period. Median intensive care stay was 4 days[3 (1-4 days) days in resection with primary anastomosis patients; 5 days (3-32 days) in stoma patients] while median hospital stay was 8 days (4-32)[7 (4-28 days) days in resection with primary anastomosis patients; 11 days (6-32 days) in stoma patients]. Conclusion: Emergency resection with primary anastomosis in colorectal tumors can be performed with a low morbidity and mortality rates in selected patients.

Özet

Amaç: Tıkanıklığa neden olan kolorektal kanserler nispeten yüksek ameliyat mortalitesine ve kötü prognoza sahiptirler. Bu hastalarda seçilecek cerrahi tedavi halen tartışmalıdır. Çalışmamızda kliniğimize kolorektal tümöre bağlı akut mekanik barsak tıkanıklığı bulguları ile başvuran olgulara yaklaşımlarımızı ve erken sonuçlarımızı geriye dönük olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntem: Çalışmaya alınan 27 hastanın yaşı, cinsiyeti, fizik muayene bulguları, kullanılan tanı yöntemleri, kliniğimize başvurduktan sonra ameliyata kadar geçen süre, ameliyat bulguları ve tümörün yerleşim yeri, uygulanan ameliyatın şekli ve anastomoz teknikleri (elle-stapler ile), açılan stomanın yeri, komplikasyonlar, yoğun bakımda ve hastanede kalış süreleri ve mortalite oranları geriye yönelik olarak dosya taraması ile kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza aldığımız hastaların 18'i erkek, 9'u kadın, medyan yaşı 53 (19-90) olarak bulundu. Palpasyonla karında distansiyon ve hassasiyet en sık saptanan fizik muayene bulgularıydı. Tüm hastalara ayakta düz karın grafisi çekilirken uygun olgularda kolonoskopi ve/veya karın ve pelvis ultrasonografisi yapıldı. Hastaların kliniğimize başvurmalarından ameliyat olmalarına kadar geçen süre ortalama 36 (24-72) saatti. Tümör en fazla sigmoid kolonda (9 olgu, %33.3) yerleşmişti. Bu hastalardan 19'una (%70) rezeksiyon ve primer anastomoz yapıldı. Anastomozların 9'u (%47) elle, 8'i (%42) stapler ile yapılırken, birden fazla anastomoz yapılan olgulardan 2'sinde (%11) ise hem elle hem de stapler ile yapıldı. Primer rezeksiyona uygun olmayan 7 hastaya çeşitli seviyelerde stoma açılırken 1 olguda ise ileokolostomi ile by-pass uygulandı. Ameliyata bağlı olarak 7 olguda (3 hasta rezeksiyon ve primer anastomoz, 4 hasta stoma) morbidite gözlenmiş olup toplam 7 olgu (%26) kaybedilmiştir. Yoğun bakımda kalış süresi medyan 4[rezeksiyon ve primer anastomozda 3 (1-24), stomada 5 (3-32)] gün iken hastanede kalış süresi medyan 8 (4-32) gün[rezeksiyon ve primer anastomozda 7 (4-28), stomada 11 (6-32)] olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Seçilmiş kolorektal tümörlü olgularda acil koşullarda yapılan rezeksiyon ve primer anastomozun düşük morbidite ve mortalite yüzdeleri ile uygulanabileceği kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇA, T., TÜRKMENOĞLU, Ö., ÇOLAK, T., BİLGİN, Ö., AYDIN, S. (2006). Surgical alternatives in acute intestinal obstructions due to colorectal malignancies. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 21–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/325591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Midgley R, Kerr D. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 1999; 353: 391–399
  2. Singh KK, Barry MK, Ralston P, et al. Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by non-specialist surgeons. Br J Surg, 1997; 84: 343–347
  3. Serpell JW, McDermott FT, Katrivessis H, et al. Obstructing carcinomas of the colon. Br J Surg, 1989; 76:965–969
  4. Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, et al. Therapeutic strategy of emergency surgery for colon cancer in 71 patients over 70 years of age in Japan. Hepatogastroenterology, 2002; 49: 393-398
  5. Gooszen AW, Gooszen HG, Veerman W, et al. Operative treatment of acute complications of diverticular disease: primary or secondary anastomosis after sigmoid resection. Eur J Surg, 2001; 167: 35-39
  6. Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno et al. Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colo-rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis, 2003; 5: 262-269
  7. Anderson JH, Hole D, McArdle CS. Elective versus emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 1992; 79: 706–709
  8. Elliott TB, Yego S, Irwin TT. Five year audit of the acute complications of diverticular disease. Br J Surg, 1997; 84: 535–539
  9. Seah DW, Ibrahim S, Tay KH. Hartmann procedure: is it still relevant today? ANZ J Surg, 2005; 75: 436-440
  10. Meyer F, Marusch F, Koch A, et al. German Study Group “Colorectal Carcinoma (Primary Tumor)”. Emergency operation in carcinomas of the left colon: value of Hartmann’s procedure.Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8 Suppl 1: 226-229
  11. Polat C, Lice H, Özaçmak İD, ve ark. Komplike olmamış malign sol kolon tıkanmalarında acil rezeksiyon ve anastomozun acil rezeksiyon ve kolostomi ile karşılaştırılması. (Erken sonuçlar ve uzun vadeli sağkalım üzerine geriye dönük çalışma). Klinik ve Deneysel Cerrahi Dergisi, 2000; 8: 129-139
  12. Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Jorba R, et al. Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction. Br J Surg, 1997; 84: 222–225
  13. Deen KI, Goldberg SM, Rothenburger DA. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: The University of Minnesota experience. J Am Coll Surg, 1998; 187: 573–576
  14. Doğru O, Kama N, Karaayvaz M, ve ark. Kolon obstrüksiyonlarında cerrahi tedavi 162 vakalık bir inceleme. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 1991; 2: 318-325
  15. Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, et al. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: a prospective randomized study in 712 patients. French Associations for Surgical Research. Ann Surg, 1998; 227: 179-186. 1