Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

The effect of hydrogel use on wound healing in pilonidal sinus patients undergoing surgical therapy by lay open technique

Sekonder iyileşmeye bırakılan pilonidal sinüs olgularında hidrojel kullanımının yara iyileşmesi üzerine etkisi

Pages
26–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, as an advantage, the wound healing time was statistically significantly shorter in hydrogel used patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the effect of Hydrogel on wound healing in pilonidal sinus patients operated by lay open technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Standard wound care was applied to patients ingroup 1 every other days, and wound dressing with hydrogel were used ingroup 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, as an advantage, the wound healing time was statistically significantly shorter in hydrogel used patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the effect of Hydrogel on wound healing in pilonidal sinus patients operated by lay open technique. Patients and Methods: Thirty-one patients, who admitted with pilonidal sinus disease to Gaziosmanpasa University Medical School, Department of General Surgery, underwent surgical therapy by lay open technique. The patients were randomized into two groups. Standard wound care was applied to patients ingroup 1 every other days, and wound dressing with hydrogel were used ingroup 2. The number of wound dressings, complete wound healing time and wound care cost were compared. Results: While wound-healing time was 64.73±44.74 days in control group, it was 40.19±10.16 days in hydrogel group (p=0.041). Mean number of wound dressing was 32.2±23.26 ingroup 1 and was 19.94±5.17 ingroup 2 (p=0.04). Mean wound care cost was 225.40±162.82 New Turkish Liras (NTL) ingroup 1 and was 187.06±43.97 NTL ingroup 2 (p=0.371). Conclusion: Hydrogel use in lay open technique of pilonidal sinus patients did not affect the cost of wound care. On the other hand, as an advantage, the wound healing time was statistically significantly shorter in hydrogel used patients.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amaç açık bırakılan pilonidal sinüs olgularında hidrojelin yara iyileşmesine olan etkisini araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı'na müracaat eden ve ameliyat edilen 31 pilonidal sinüs hastası rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Birinci gruptaki hastalara günaşırı standart yara bakımı yapılırken, ikinci gruptaki hastalara yine günaşırı hidrojel ile pansuman yapıldı. Hastaların pansuman sayısı, yaranın tamamen kapanma süresi ve yapılan işlem sonucunda çıkarılan yara bakımına ait maliyet hesapları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Kontrol grubundaki yara iyileşme süresi 64.73±44.74 gün iken hidrojel grubunda 40.19±10.16 gün olarak bulundu (p=0.041). Ortalama pansuman sayısı grup 1'de 32.2±23.26 iken, hidrojel grubunda 19.94±5.17 idi (p=0.04). Ortalama yara bakım maliyeti ise grup 1'de 225.40±162.82 Yeni Türk Lirası iken grup 2'de 187.06±43.97 YTL idi (p=0.371). Sonuç: Açık bırakılan pilonidal sinüs olgularında hidrojel kullanımının maliyete olumlu ya da olumsuz etkisi olmamasına rağmen yara iyileşmesini anlamlı miktarda hızlandırarak önemli bir avantaj sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYAOĞLU, H. A., ÖZKAN, N., ERSOY, Ö. F., ÇELİK, A. (2006). The effect of hydrogel use on wound healing in pilonidal sinus patients undergoing surgical therapy by lay open technique. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 26–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/325548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet, 1973; 2: 1414-1415
  2. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg,1992; 62: 385-389
  3. Bascom JU. Repeat pilonidal operations. Am J Surg, 1987; 154: 118-122
  4. Bozkurt MK, Tezel E. Management of pilonidal sinus with the Limberg flap. Dis Colon Rectum, 1998; 41: 775-777
  5. Senapati A, Cripps NP, Thompson MR. Bascom’s operation in the day-surgical management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg, 2000; 87: 1067-1070
  6. Senapati A. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Tech Coloproctol, 2003; 7: 211
  7. Spivak H, Brooks VL, Nussbaum M, Friedman I. Treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: 1136-1139. 8. al-Hassan HK, Francis IM, Neglen P. Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus? Acta Chir Scand, 1990; 156: 695-699
  8. Mansoory A, Dickson D. Z-plasty for treatment of disease of the pilonidal sinus. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1982; 155: 409-411
  9. Urhan MK, Kucukel F, Topgul K, Ozer I, Sari S. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002; 45: 656-659
  10. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol, 2003;7: 3-8
  11. Testini M, Piccinni G, Miniello S, et al. Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique. Colorectal Dis, 2001; 3: 427-430
  12. Helfman T, Ovington L, Falanga V. Occlusive dressings and wound healing. Clin Dermatol, 1994; 12: 121-127
  13. Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mehle AL, Mertz PM. Optimal use of an occlusive dressing to enhance healing. Effect of delayed application and early removal on wound healing. Arch Dermatol,1988; 124: 392-395
  14. Özkan A, Tosun Z, Sentürk S, ve ark. Greft donör alanı bakımında hidrojel kullanımı. Türk Plast Rekonstr Est Cer Derg, 2005; 13: 28-31
  15. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective,randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2005; 20: 415-422
  16. Perruchoud C, Vuilleumier H, Givel JC.