Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Multiple common bile duct and gallbladder stones: A case report and literature review

Çoklu koledok ve safra kesesi taşları: Olgu sunumu ve literatürün gözden geçirilmesi

Pages
72–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This case is interesting for multiple and large size calcium carbonate stones that are secondary, which in the common bile duct are usually encountered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Common bile duct stones may be primary stones originating from the duct itself or secondary stones that have fallen out of the gallbladder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Common bile duct stones are found in 15 % of a group of patients with gallbladder stones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This case is interesting for multiple and large size calcium carbonate stones that are secondary, which in the common bile duct are usually encountered.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Koledokolitiyaz · Safra kesesi hastalıkları · Kalsiyum

Abstract

Common bile duct stones may be primary stones originating from the duct itself or secondary stones that have fallen out of the gallbladder. They can be single or multiple. Common bile duct stones are found in 15 % of a group of patients with gallbladder stones. Secondary stones are generally bilirubin and cholesterol stones. Primary bile duct stones occur at least 2 years after cholecystectomy. These stones are also bilirubin and cholesterol stones and calcium stones are rarely detected. In this patient presented here, sixty five stones nearly 10 mm were extracted from the common bile duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Previously, fourty four 10 mm stones and twenty two 5 mm to 10 mm stones had been removed during cholecystectomy. This case is interesting for multiple and large size calcium carbonate stones that are secondary, which in the common bile duct are usually encountered.

Özet

Ana safra yolu taşları, koledoktan kaynaklanan primer taşlar olabileceği gibi, safra kesesinden düşmüş sekonder taşlar şeklinde de gelişebilir. Bunlar tekli veya çoklu olabilirler. Safra kesesi taşı olan hastaların %15'inde ana safra yolunda taş bulunur. Sekonder taşlar genellikle bilirubin ve kolesterol taşlarıdır. Primer koledok taşları kolesistektomiden en az 2 yıl sonra oluşan taşlardır. Bunlar da genellikle bilirubin ve kolesterol taşları olup kalsiyum taşları nadir görülür. Burada sunduğumuz hastada endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreotografi (ERCP) ile koledoktan altmış beş adet yaklaşık 10 mm çapta kalsiyum taşı çıkarıldı. Daha önceden de aynı hastadan kolesistektomi ile birlikte kırk dört adet 10 mm ve yirmi iki adet 5-10 mm çapta taş çıkarılmıştı. Koledokta büyük boyutta ve çok sayıda sekonder gelişen kalsiyum taşlarının nadir görülmesi nedeniyle bu olgu ilginç bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDİL, B., AKKIZ, H., SANDIKÇI, M., GÜMÜRDÜLÜ, Y., COŞAR, A., KECE, C. (2009). Multiple common bile duct and gallbladder stones: A case report and literature review. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 72–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/325533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Saharia PC, Zuidema GD, Cameron JL. Primary common duct stones. Ann Surg 1977;185:598-604
  2. Schirmer BD, Winters KL, Edlich RF. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005; 15: 329-338 3) Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss- Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 2004; 187:475-481 4) Hallal AH, Amortegui JD, Jeroukhimov IM, Casillas J, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 869-875 5) Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Paterson-Brown S, Nixon SJ. Role of liver function tests in predicting common bile duct stones in acute calculous cholecystitis. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1241-1247 6) Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, Staroscik R, et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a metaanalysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 450-455 7) Shiffman ML, Sugerman HJ, Moore EW. Human gallbladder mucosal function. Effect of concentration and acidification of bile on cholesterol and calcium solubility. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1452-1459 8) Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, et al. Prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited Ann Surg 2004;239: 28-33 9) Hammarstrom LE, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in cholecystectomized patients. World J Surg. 1996;20:272-276
  3. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:917-921
  4. Gregg JA, De Girolami P, Carr-Locke DL. Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct. Am J Surg 1985;149:668-671
  5. Wolpers C, Hofmann AF. Solitary versus multiple cholesterol gallbladder stones Mechanisms of formation and growth. Clin Investig 1993; 71:423-434 13) Paolo P, Nicoletta P, Carla M, Andrea M. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 1990; 61: 213-218 14) Cabada Giadas T, Sarria Octavio de Toledo L, et al. Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27: 61-70 15) Polkowski M, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic re