Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Comparison between Karydakis flap repair and Limberg flap for surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (short term results)

Sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinüsün cerrahi tedavisinde Karydakis flep ile Limberg flep ameliyatlarının karşılaştırılması (erken dönem sonuçları)

Pages
153–156
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Limberg flap closure method is better and more effective than Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus disease, because of wound infection control at early stage and less recurrence rate at later stage and early return to daily life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Pilonidal sinus is an intergluteal region disease with acute or chronic pain and is especially more common in young men.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Patients with pilonidal sinus disease were treated by excision plus primary closure (Group 1, n=68) or rhomboid excision plus Limberg flap advancement (Group 2, n=74).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Limberg flap closure method is better and more effective than Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus disease, because of wound infection control at early stage and less recurrence rate at later stage and early return to daily life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Pilonidal sinus is an intergluteal region disease with acute or chronic pain and is especially more common in young men. There are many medical modalities and surgical techniques in the treatment of this disease. At this study we aimed to present two different types of surgical methods and their follow-up results in patients with pilonidal sinus. Patients and Methods: Patients with pilonidal sinus disease were treated by excision plus primary closure (Group 1, n=68) or rhomboid excision plus Limberg flap advancement (Group 2, n=74). Data were collected retrospectively and demographic data, operation time, hospital stay duration, time-off from work, follow-up time, number of patients with recurrence and time to recurrence were evaluated in all patients. Results: No significant difference was detected between group 1 and 2 in terms of gender and duration of operation time (p=0.651). Hospital stay duration (1.44 [1&#8211;3] days, p<0.001) and time off from work (12 [8&#8211;14] days, p<0.001) were found to be shorter in rhomboid excision with Limberg flap advancement (Group 2). Serous fluid collection and discharge were seen at the site of the lesion in four patients (5.81%) in group 1 (n=68), and in four patients (5.4%) in group 2 (n=74). Subcutaneous hematoma was detected in one patient (1.35 %) in group 2. During the follow-up period, none of the patients developed wound infection. Recurrence was seen in one patient (1.5%) in group 1. Conclusion: Limberg flap closure method is better and more effective than Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus disease, because of wound infection control at early stage and less recurrence rate at later stage and early return to daily life.

Özet

Amaç: Pilonidal sinüs intergluteal bölgede, özellikle genç erkeklerde daha sık görülen, akut ağrılı veya kronik şekli olan bir hastalıktır. Bu hastalığın tedavisinde çok sayıda cerrahi teknik ve tıbbi yöntem tanımlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde iki farklı cerrahi tedavi yöntemi uygulanan pilonidal sinüslü hastaların takip sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Pilonidal sinüs tedavisinde hastalara Karydakis flep (Grup 1, n=68) ve rhomboid eksizyon + Limberg flep (Grup 2, n=74) cerrahisi uygulandı. Tüm hastalar retrospektif olarak yaş, cinsiyet, operasyon süresi, hastanede kalış zamanı, işe dönüş, takip süresi, nüks ve nükse kadar geçen zaman açısından incelendi. Bulgular: Uygulanan cerrahi yöntemler arasında demografik özellikler ve operasyon süresi açısından fark bulunmazken (p=0.651), Rhomboid eksizyon + Limberg flep uygulanan grup 2‘de hastanede kalış süresi kısa (1.44 [1–3] p<0.001) ve işe dönüş süresi erken (12 [8–14] gün, p<0.001) olarak bulunmuştur. Grup 1'deki toplam 68 hastanın dördünde (%5.8) ve grup 2'deki 74 hastanın dördünde (%5.4) yara yerinde seröz sıvı koleksiyonu ve akıntı saptandı. Grup 2'deki hastaların birinde (%1.35) yara yerinde ciltaltı hematomu oluştu. Takipler sırasında her iki grupta da hiçbir hastada yara yerinde infeksiyon görülmezken, grup 1'de bir (%1.5) hastada erken dönemde nüks görüldü. Sonuç: Pilonidal sinüs hastalığının cerrahi tedavisinde erken dönemde yara infeksiyonunun, geç dönemde nüksün ve günlük hayata dönme süresinin daha az olması nedeniyle, Limberg flep kullanılarak yapılan kapama yöntemi Karydakis flepe göre üstün ve etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖZEN, S., TOPUZ, Ö., DÖNDER, Y., EMİR, S., ÖZDEMİR, C. Ş., KEÇELİ, M., BAKTIR, H. A., SARICIK, B. (2010). Comparison between Karydakis flap repair and Limberg flap for surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (short term results). Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 153–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/325503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:39-42
  2. Urhan MK, Kücükel F, Topgul K et al. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:656-659
  3. Bozkurt MK, Tezel E. Management of pilonidal sinus with the Limberg flap. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:775-777
  4. Spivak H, Brooks VL, Nussbaum M, Friedman I. Treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1136-1139
  5. Füzün M, Bakır H, Soylu M et al. Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus- open or closed? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1148-1150
  6. Alemdaroğlu K, Akçal T, Buğra D. Pilonidal Hastalık. Kolon Rektum ve Anal Bölge Hastalıkları. 1.baskı, İstanbul. 2003:185- 7) Çubukçu A, Çubukçu D. Pilonidal sinüs hastalığı. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi 2002;16:234-238
  7. Armstrong JH, Barcia PJ. Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach. Arch Surg 1994;129:914-917
  8. Kooistra HP. Pilonidal sinuses. Review of the literature and report of three hundred and fifty cases. Am J Surg 1942;55:3-17
  9. Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin N Am 2002; 1169-1185
  10. Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg 1992;62:385-389
  11. Kitchen PRB. Pilonidal sinus experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1452-1455
  12. Anyanwu AC, Hossain S, Williams A, Montgomery AC. Karydakis operation for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: Experience in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80: 197-199
  13. Ertan T, Koç M, Göçmen E et al. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 2005;190:388–392
  14. Cihan A, Menteş BB, Tatlıcıoğlu E et al. Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery. ANZ J Surg 2004;74:238-242
  15. Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E et al. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1436-1444
  16. Leventoğlu S, Özdemir S, Özçay N et al. Comparison of primary closure with Limberg Flap in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2008;19: 90-92
  17. Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today 2004;34:419-423
  18. Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, Durgun V. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus