Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

The early results of our initial experience with robotic adrenalectomy

Robotik adrenalektomide başlangıç deneyim ve ilk sonuçlarımız

Pages
28–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However its high cost has emerged as its main disadvantage

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Robotic adrenalectomy is one of the minimally invasive surgical methods gaining wide acceptance due to the three-dimensional imaging system and ergonomics of the equipment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The records of eight cases, in which a unilateral robotic trans-peritoneal adrenalectomy was conducted due to an adrenal mass between 2011 and 2013, have been evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However its high cost has emerged as its main disadvantage
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Robotic adrenalectomy is one of the minimally invasive surgical methods gaining wide acceptance due to the three-dimensional imaging system and ergonomics of the equipment. We aimed to present the early data on patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy due to adrenal masses in our hospital. Material and Methods: The records of eight cases, in which a unilateral robotic trans-peritoneal adrenalectomy was conducted due to an adrenal mass between 2011 and 2013, have been evaluated. Demographic characteristics of cases, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, preoperative diagnosis, diameter and localization of the adrenal mass, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate to open surgery, morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospital stay, total hospital charges and postoperative pathologic results were considered. Results: The female to male ratio was 6:2, the median age was 49.5 and the median BMI was 29.7 (21.7-38.5). An adrenalectomy was performed in six cases for a right adrenal mass and in two cases for a left adrenal mass. The mean tumor diameter was 53.6 mm . The average surgical time (including docking) was 98 min. (55-175 min.) and the average blood loss was 50 mL. The only complication was a diaphragm injury which was repaired robotically. There were no conversions to traditional laparoscopic or open surgery and there have not been any mortality in the series. The median length of hospital stay was 4.1 days and the average cost was 3617.12 TL ($1808.56). Conclusion: Robotic adrenalectomy is an effective and safe surgical alternative to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. However its high cost has emerged as its main disadvantage

Özet

Amaç: Robotik adrenalektomi, üç boyutlu görüntü sistemi ve el aletlerinin ergonomik oluşundan dolayı giderek yaygınlaşan minimal invaziv cerrahi yöntemlerden biridir. Hastanemizde adrenal kitle nedeniyle robotik adrenalektomi uygulanan hastalarımıza ait ilk verilerimizi sunmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2011-2013 yılları arasında adrenal kitle nedeniyle tek taraflı transperitoneal robotik adrenalektomi uygulanan sekiz olgunun kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Olgulara ait demografik özellikler, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), Amerikan Anestezi Cemiyeti (ASA) skoru, preoperatif tanı, kitlenin çapı ve lokalizasyonu, ameliyat süresi, ameliyattaki kanama miktarları, açığa geçiş oranı, morbidite ve mortalite oranı, hastanede kalış süresi, toplam maliyet ve postoperatif patolojik tanılar incelendi. Bulgular: Sekiz olguda K/E: 6/2, ortalama yaş: 49,5 , ortalama VKİ: 29,7 (21,7-38,5) olup olguların altısında sağ, ikisinde ise sol adrenal kitle nedeniyle adrenalektomi yapıldı. Kitle çapı ortalama 53,6 mm idi. Ortalama ameliyat süresi (docking süresi dahil) 98 dakika , ortalama kan kaybı 50 mL idi. Komplikasyon olarak bir olguda (%12,5) diyafram yaralanması meydana geldi ve bu yaralanma robotik olarak onarıldı. Olgularda laparoskopi veya açığa geçiş gereksinimi olmazken hiçbir hastada mortalite gelişmedi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 4,1 gün ve ortalama maliyet 3617,12 TL (1808,56$) idi. Sonuç: Robotik adrenalektomi; laparoskopik adrenalektomiye etkili ve güvenilir bir cerrahi alternatiftir. Ancak yüksek maliyeti, başlıca dezavantajı olarak görünmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKARSU, C., DURAL, A. C., KANKAYA, B., ÇELİK, M. F., KÖNEŞ, O., MERT, M., KALAYCI, M. U., ALIŞ, H. (2014). The early results of our initial experience with robotic adrenalectomy. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 28–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/325426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. NEJM 1992
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Mercan S, Seven R, Ozarmagan S, Tezelman S. Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery 1995
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Heslin MJ, Winzeler AH, Weingarten JO, Diethelm AG, UristMM, Bland KI. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy and splenectomy are safe and reduce hospital stay and charges. Am Surg 2002
  4. Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg 2009
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Murphy MM, Witkowski ER, Ng SC, McDade TP, Hill JS, Larkin AC, et al. Trends in adrenalectomy: a recent national review. Surg Endosc 2010
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Morris LF, Perrier ND. Advances in robotic adrenalectomy. Curr Opin Oncol 2012
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo SM, Caravaglios G, et al. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a technical option for the surgeon? Int J Med Robot 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Alış H, Gönenç M, Deniztaş C, Kapan S, Turhan AN, Aygün E. Robotik abdominal cerrahi: Tek merkezden ilk deneyimler ve sonuçları. Ulusal Cer Derg 2011
  9. Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, De Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, Coletta M, Perretta S. The learning curve in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J 32 Endocrinol Invest 2008
  10. Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Rouers A, Klein M, Boissel P, et al. Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 2008
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Hyams ES, Stifelman MD. The role of robotics for adrenal pathology. Curr Opin Urol 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Raphoz AL, Levan T, et al. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 2008
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Hubens G, Ysebaert D, Vaneerdeweg W, Chapelle T, Eyskens E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot. Acta Chir Belg 1999
  14. Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, et al. Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 2006
  16. [CrossRef] 16. D’Annibale A, Lucandri G, Monsellato I, de Angelis M, Pernazza