Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatografinin laparoskopik kolesistektomiye olumsuz etkisi var mı?

Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have a negative effect on laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Pages
128–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In two (1.6%) patients, bleeding and biliary fistula were the reasons for re-operation.Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more complicated in patients who underwent ERCP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We have observed that patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) had some difficulties with laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through a retrospective study, we planned to compare the surgical procedures between patients who had undergone ERCP and those who had not in order to clarify this.Material and Methods: The results of 122 patients who had undergone ERCP because of choledocholithiasis before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures between 2008 and 2011 were compared to the values of 2140 patients operated because of cholelithiasis only within the same period.Results: Among the patients who underwent surgical procedures following ERCP, 80 (65%) were female and 42 (35%) were male.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In two (1.6%) patients, bleeding and biliary fistula were the reasons for re-operation.Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more complicated in patients who underwent ERCP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We have observed that patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) had some difficulties with laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Through a retrospective study, we planned to compare the surgical procedures between patients who had undergone ERCP and those who had not in order to clarify this.Material and Methods: The results of 122 patients who had undergone ERCP because of choledocholithiasis before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures between 2008 and 2011 were compared to the values of 2140 patients operated because of cholelithiasis only within the same period.Results: Among the patients who underwent surgical procedures following ERCP, 80 (65%) were female and 42 (35%) were male. The average age of the patients was 51.9 years (range: 20-83 years). The operation period after the procedure was 30.14 days (range: 1-93 days). Although the hospitalization period was 4.67 days (range: 1-22 days), the postoperative hospitalization period was 2.68 days (range: 1-15 days). Regarding the difficulty of operation, adhesion in 58 (47.5%) patients, bleeding in two (1.6%) patients, and conversion to open procedure in 12 (9.8) patients were observed. In two (1.6%) patients, bleeding and biliary fistula were the reasons for re-operation.Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more complicated in patients who underwent ERCP.

Özet

Amaç: Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatografi (ERCP) yapılmış hastalarda laparoskopik kolesistektomi cerrahisinin daha problemli olduğunu gördük. Bu durumu aydınlatmak amacıyla retrospektif bir çalışma ile ERCP yapılan ve yapılmayan hastaların cerrahi işlemlerini karşılaştırmayı planladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2008-2011 yılları arasında koledokolitiazis nedeniyle ERCP yapıldıktan sonra laparoskopik kolesistektomi ameliyatı uygulanan 122 hastanın değerleri, aynı dönem içinde kolelitiazis nedeniyle opere edilen 2140 hasta ile karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar; cinsiyet, yaş, operasyon zamanı, hastanede total yatış süresi, operasyon sonrası hastanede yatış süresi, operasyon zorluğu, diren koyma oranı, açığa geçiş oranı ve reoperasyon nedeni açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatografi sonrası cerrahi uygulanan hastaların 80'i (%65) bayan, 42'si (%35) erkek idi. Ortalama yaş 51,9 (20-83) idi. İşlem sonrası operasyon zamanı 30,14 (1-93) gün idi. Hastanede yatış süresi 4,67 (1-22) gün ve operasyon sonrası hastanede kalış süresi 2,68 (1-15) gündü. Operasyon zorluğu olarak adezyon 58'inde (%47,5), kanama 2'sinde (%1,6), açığa geçiş 12'sinde (%9,8) görüldü. Reoperasyon nedeni; 2 hastada (%1,6) kanama ve safra fistülüydü. Sonuç: Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatografi yapılan hastalarda laparoskopik kolesistektomi ameliyatı daha zordur

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, M., KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR, T., TEKİN, A., YILDIRIM, M. A., KARTAL, A. (2015). Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatografinin laparoskopik kolesistektomiye olumsuz etkisi var mı?. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 128–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/325377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L. Randomised clinical trial of day- care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 40-45. [CrossRef] Vavrecka A. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangio- pancreatography and how to minimize them. Vnitr Lek 2011; 57: 1053-1056. Fulcher AS. MRCP and ERCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 178-182. [CrossRef] Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacob- son BC, et al. Standards of Practice Committee. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Complications of ERCP. Gastroin- test Endosc 2003; 57: 633-638. [CrossRef] Ishizawa T, Bandai Y, Kokudo N. Fluorescent cholangiography us- ing indocyanine green for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an ini- tial experience. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 381-390. [CrossRef] Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 2008; 32: 2230-2236. [CrossRef] Kaafarani HM, Smith TS, Neumayer L, Berger DH, Depalma RG, Itani KM. Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conver- sion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 32-40. [CrossRef] Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL. Surgical out- comes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 2009; 197: 781-784. [CrossRef] Alper E, Akay S, Buyraç Z, Aslan F, Alper I, Ünsal B. Endosonog- raphy and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography show similar efficacy in selecting patients for ERCP in mild-moderate acute biliary pancreatitis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 580-584.
  2. Parlak E, Cengiz C, Dışıbeyaz S, Çiçek B, Özın Y, Kacar S, et al. Early repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: pre- dictive factors and interventions required. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 371-377.
  3. Sarıtaş Ü, Üstündağ Y, Baron TH. Prevention of post-ERCP pancre- atitis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2011; 22: 449-463.
  4. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Ko CY. A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement pro- gram. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 176-186. [CrossRef] Allen NL, Leeth RR, Finan KR, Tishler DS, Vickers SM, Wilcox CM, et al. Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincteroto- my for choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 292-296. [CrossRef] Donkervoort SC, van Ruler O, Dijksman LM, van Geloven AA, P