Journals / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Kolonik mukozal psödolipomatozis: Farkında mıyız?

Colonic mucosal pseudolipomatosis: Are we aware of it?

Pages
90–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here we report and discuss colonic pseudolipomatosis incidentally found in a series of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy, and we underline the endoscopic pattern and diagnostic difficulties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Colonic mucosal pseudolipomatosis is rare, and its pathogenesis is controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A number of mechanisms, including mechanical injury during an endoscopic procedure or chemical injury by disinfectant, seem to contribute to its pathogenesis.Material and Methods: This retrospective study examined the colonic biopsies of 1370 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here we report and discuss colonic pseudolipomatosis incidentally found in a series of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy, and we underline the endoscopic pattern and diagnostic difficulties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Colonic mucosal pseudolipomatosis is rare, and its pathogenesis is controversial. A number of mechanisms, including mechanical injury during an endoscopic procedure or chemical injury by disinfectant, seem to contribute to its pathogenesis.Material and Methods: This retrospective study examined the colonic biopsies of 1370 patients. These biopsies were preserved at the Department of Pathology of Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between January 2012 and June 2013.Results: We found pseudolipomatosis in 14 of 1370 colonoscopy cases (1.02%). Of these 14 patients, 8 were male and 6 were female. The male patients were between 24 and 66 years, with a mean of 39; the female patients were between 26 and 58 years, with a mean of 42.Conclusion: Many endoscopists are unaware of the lesion, and the diagnosis is generally possible only after pathological assessment of multiple biopsies taken from suspect lesions. Here we report and discuss colonic pseudolipomatosis incidentally found in a series of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy, and we underline the endoscopic pattern and diagnostic difficulties.

Özet

Amaç: Kolonik mukozal psödolipomatozis, nadir görülen ve patogenezi halen tam aydınlatılamamış bir konudur. Endoskopik işlem sırasında gelişen mekanik hasar veya dezenfektanların yol açtığı kimyasal hasar gibi birtakım mekanizmalar, oluşumuna katkıda bulunuyor olabilir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, Ocak 2012-Haziran 2013 arasında işlem yapılan ve alınan kolonoskopik biyopsi örnekleri İstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nin Patoloji Bölümü'nde saklanan 1370 hastaya ait veriler değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Alınan 1370 kolonoskopik biyopsi örneğinin 14 tanesinde (%1,02) psödolipomatozis saptadık. Bu 14 hastanın 8'i kadın, 6'sı erkekti. Erkek hastaların yaşları 24 ve 66 arasında değişirken (ortalama 39); kadın hastaların yaşları ise 26 ve 58 arasıydı (ortalama 42).Sonuç: Birçok endoskopist bu lezyonlardan habersiz olup tanı; şüpheli lezyonlardan alınan örneklerin patolojik değerlendirmesi ile mümkün olmaktadır. Burada rutin kolonoskopiye giren bir grup hastanın biyopsilerinde tesadüfen saptanan kolonik psödolipomatozisin endoskopik özelliklerini ve tanısal güçlüklerini tartışmaktayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSÖZ, F., TOROS, A. B., ÇAKAR, E., GÜNEŞ, M. E., ÇULCU, S., SARI, S., ARI, A., PAŞAOĞLU, E., DURSUN, N. (2016). Kolonik mukozal psödolipomatozis: Farkında mıyız?. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 90–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/325356

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Snover DC, Sandstad J, Hutton S. Mucosal pseudolipomatosis of the colon. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 575-580
  2. Waring JP, Manne RK, Wadas DD, Sanowski RA. Mucosal pseudolipomatosis: An air pressure-related colonoscopy complication. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 93-94. [CrossRef] 3. Kim SJ, Baek IH. Colonic mucosal pseudolipomatosis: Disinfectant colitis ? Gastroenterol Nurs 2012; 35: 208-213. [CrossRef] 4. Cammarota G, Cesaro P, Cazzato A, Fedeli P, Riccioni ME, Sparano L, et al. Hydrogen peroxide-related colitis (previously known as "pseudolipomatosis"): a series of cases occurring in an epidemic pattern. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 916-919. [CrossRef] 5. Lapeyre B. The 'frost sign' and the 'snow white sign': Intramucosal air injection or peroxide colitis? Endoscopy 2005; 37: 679. [CrossRef] 6. Brevet M, Chatelain D, Bartoli E, Geslin G, Delcenserie R, Braillon A, et al. Colonic pseudolipomatosis: clinical, endoscopical and pathological features in nine cases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006; 30: 9-13. [CrossRef] 7. Jonas G, Mahoney A, Murray J, Gertler S. Chemical colitis due to endoscope cleaning solutions: A mimic of pseudomembranous colitis. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 1403-1408
  3. Prignet JM, Carloz E, Kunkel D. Pseudolipomatose muqueuse rectisigmoidienne revelee par une diarrhee chronique. Discussion physiopathologique a propos d' un cas et revue de la litterature. Acta Endoscopica 1995; 25: 175-178. [CrossRef] 9. Whitehead R. Mucosal biopsy of the GI tract. 1985; Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders
  4. Sheehan JF, Brynjolfsson G. Ulcerative colitis following hydrogen peroxite enema: Case report and experimental production with transient emphysema of colonic wall and gas embolism. Lab Invest 1960; 9: 150-168.