Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Intestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis

İntestinal ve peritoneal tüberküloz

Pages
43–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall mortality rate was 13.2%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background : Abdominal tuberculosis (tbc) is still a medical problem in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since it imitates many abdominal diseases, diagnosis can be easily missed unless the disease is suspected. - Methods : The aim of this study to evaluate the value of clinical, physical and laboratory findings and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic options in 121 patients with intestinal and peritoneal tbc.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall mortality rate was 13.2%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Laparotomi · Tuberküloz · gastrointestinal

Abstract

Background : Abdominal tuberculosis (tbc) is still a medical problem in developing countries. Since it imitates many abdominal diseases, diagnosis can be easily missed unless the disease is suspected. - Methods : The aim of this study to evaluate the value of clinical, physical and laboratory findings and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic options in 121 patients with intestinal and peritoneal tbc. The diagnosis was made by histopathological examination of biopsy material and isolation ofmycobacterium bacillus in cultures or smears of ascidie fluid. Results : The diagnosis was confirmed with laparotomy in 102, laparoscopy in 4, colonoscopy in 6, and percutaneous aspiration in 9 patients. There were intestinal tbc in 67 (55.3%) patients and peritoneal tbc in 54 (44.6%). Intestinal involvement was commonly located at ileocecal area. Anti tuberculous chemotherapy was started and avoided from extensive resection in surgical treatment. There were a total of 87 complications in 52 patients (42.9%) at the postoperative period. Wound infection was the most frequent complication. Overall mortality rate was 13.2%. The mortality rate in emergency operation was 20.5% while 3.4% in elective conditions. There were no morbidity and mortality in patients whose diagnosis were made by conservative procedures. Conclusions : Laparoscopic endoscopie and percutaneous aspiration procedures are useful for diagnosis in the selected cases of intestinal and peritoneal tbc. Laparotomy should be performed only when complication develops or diagnosis is uncertain. Extensive resection should be avoided in surgical treatment of intestinal tbc. Early diagnosis and treatment will decreas the complications that can be develop during the progress of the disease and consequently the mortality rates.

Özet

Amaç : Bu çalışmanın amacı kliniğimizde intestinal ve peritoneal tüberküloz tanısıyla tedavi edilen hastaları klinik, fizik ve laboratuar muayeneleri yönünden değerlendirmek ve uygulanan tanı ve tedavi yöntemlerini tartışmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 1985-Aralık 1999 tarihleri arasında 67 intestinal ve 54 peritoneal tüberküloz tanısıyla tedavi edilen toplam 121 hasta retmspektifolarak incelendi. Bu hastalarda tanı, biyopsi materyallerinin histopatolojik muayenesi sonucu yada asit materyalin smeari veya kültüründe Mycobakterium'un izole edilmesiyle kondu. Tüm hastalara tanı konur konmaz antitüberkülo tedavi başlandı ve cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastalarda mümkün olduğunca masif rezeksiyondan kaçınıldı. Bulgular : Tanı materyali 102 hastada laparotomi, 4 hastada laparoskopi, 6 hastada kolonoskopi ve 9 hastada perkutan aspirasyon ile alındı, intestinal tutulum en sık ileoçekal bölgedeydi. Postoperatif dönemde 52 (%42.9) hastada toplam 87 komplikasyon görüldü. Cilt altı infeksiyonu en sık görülen postoperatif morbidité nedeniydi. Çalışmanın genel mortalité oranı 13.2% idi. Bu oran acil cerrahi girişim uygulanan hastalarda %20.5, elektif cerrahi girişim uygulanan hastalarda %3.4 olarak saptandı. Konservatif girişimle tanı konup, tedavisi başlanan hastalarda ise mortalité görülmedi. Sonuç : Laparoskopik endoskopik işlemler ve perkutan aspirasyon yöntemi seçilmiş intestinal ve peritoneal tüberkülozla olgularda tanı için yararlıdır. Bu hastalarda laparotomi sadece intestinal tüberküloza bağlı komplikasyonlar meydana geldiğinde veya Abdominal tüberküloz tanısının şüpheli olduğu durumlarda uygulanmalıdır, intestinal tüberküloz için cerrahi girişim uygulandığında masif rezeksiyondan kaçınılmalıdır. Peritoneal ve intestinal tüberkülozlu olgularda erken tanı ve tedavi genellikle hastalığın gidişi sırasında meydana gelebilecek olan komplikasyonlan ve buna bağlı mortaliteyi önler.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜN, M. Y., YILMAZ, G., TAÇYILDIZ, İ. (2002). Intestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 43–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/325155

References (18)

  1. /. Guth A A, Kim U. The reappearance of abdominal tuberculosis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1991
  2. 436 2. Lingenfelser T, ZakJ, Marks IN, Steyn E, HalkettJ, Price S K. Abdominal tuberculosis: Still a potentially lethal disease. AmJ Gastroenterol 1993
  3. Underwood M J, Thompson MM, Sayers R 0, Hall A W. Presentation of abdominal tuberculosis to general surgeons. BrJ Surg 1992
  4. W77-179 4. AkınogluA, Bilgin 1. Tuberculous enteritis and peritonitis. Can] Surgery 1988
  5. 58 5. LisehoraGE, Lee M, Barcia PJ. Exploratory laparotomy for diagnosis oftuberculous peritonitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989
  6. 302 6. Al-Quorain A A,Satti M B, Al-Freihi H M, Al-Gindan YM, Al-Awad N. Abdominal tuberculosis in Saudi Arabia: A Clinicopathological study of 65 cases. AmJ Gastroenterol 1993
  7. 79 7. Watters DA. Surgery for tuberculosis before and after human immundefiency virus infection: a tropikal perspective. Br J Surg 1997
  8. Chen WS, Su WJ, Wang HS, JiangJK, LinJK, Lin TC. Large bowel tuberculosis and possible influencing factors for surgical prognosis: 30 years experience. World J Surg 1997
  9. 4 9. Ko CY, Schmit PJ, Petrie B, Thompson JE. Abdominal tuberculosis: the surgical perspective. Am Surg. 1996
  10. Balthazar EJ, Gordon R, Hulnick D. Ileocecal tuberculosis: CT and radiologic evaluation. AJR 1990
  11. 503 11. Marshall J B. Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. AmJ Gastroenterol 1993
  12. 999 12. Manohar A, Simjee A E, Hajfejee AA. Symptoms and investigative findings in 145 patients with tuberculous peritonitis diagnosed by pehtoneoscopy and biopsy over a five year period. Gut 1990
  13. 3l:1130-1132 13. Sherman S, RohwedderJJ, Ravikrishnan K P, WegJ G. Tuberculous enteritis and peritonitis. Arch Intern Med 1980
  14. 508 14. Bhargava D K, Shriniwas, Chopra P, N'ijhawan S, Dasarathy S, Kushwaha AKS. Peritoneal tuberculosis: laparoscopic patterns and its diagnostic accuracy. Am J Gastroenterol 1992
  15. 112 15. Aston NO, A.M., ChirM. Abdominal Tuberculosis. World J Surg 1997
  16. 7 16. Weeragandham BRS, Lynch FP, Canty TG, Collins DL, Dankner WM. Abdominal Tuberculosis in children: Review of 26 cases.Joumal ofPediatric Surgery 1996
  17. Lisehora GB, Peters CC, Lee YT, Barcia PJ. Tuberculous 18. Mısra SP, Misra V, Dwivedi M, Gupta SC. Colonic tuberculosis: clinical features, endoscopic appearance and management] GastroenterolHepatol 1999
  18. Apaydın B, Paksoy M, Bilir M, Z