Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The comparison of the results of the conservative treatment between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal truma

Künt karın travması sonrası izole abdominal solid organ yaralanmaları olan olgular ile beraberinde ekstraabdominal yaralanmaları da olan olguların konservatif tedavi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
23–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The existence of extraabdominal injuries, however, prolongs the hospital stay and increases the need of the blood transfusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: To determine whether conservative treatment in blunt abdominal solid organ injuries associated with extraabdominal trauma is safe or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between December 1998 and December 2001, 49 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma, 34 of whom were hemodynamically stable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The existence of extraabdominal injuries, however, prolongs the hospital stay and increases the need of the blood transfusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yaralar · delici olmayan · Batın yaralanmaları

Abstract

Background: To determine whether conservative treatment in blunt abdominal solid organ injuries associated with extraabdominal trauma is safe or not. Methods: Between December 1998 and December 2001, 49 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma, 34 of whom were hemodynamically stable. These 34 patients were divided into two groups. Seventeen patients had isolated abdominal solid organ injuries (Group I) and 17 patients had associated extraabdominal injuries (Group II). The results of conservative treatment, blood pressure values, pulse rates, ages, gender, abdominal solid organ injury scores, the etiologies of trauma, the number of the blood transfusions, morbidity and mortality rates, and hospital stays were compared. Results: The blood pressure values and pulse rates as measured in our emergency room, abdominal solid organ injury scores, ages, gender, the results of conservative treatment, the etiologies of trauma, morbidity and morta-lity rates were similar in both groups. Comparisons between hospital stays and numbers of the blood transfusi-on have show statistically significant differences in favour of group II. No patients had hollow viscus injury. Conclusion: Conservative tratment is safe for hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients with solid organ injury but no hollow viscus injury, even if they have extraabdominal injuries. The existence of extraabdominal injuries, however, prolongs the hospital stay and increases the need of the blood transfusion.

Özet

Amaç: Ekstraabdominal organ yaralanmalarının eşlik ettiği kunt travmaya bağlı abdominal solid organ yaralanmalarında konservatif tedavinin güvenli olup olmadığının değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Aralık 1998 - Aralık 2001 tarihleri arasında kunt karın travması nedeniyle başvuran 49 hastadan hemodinamisi stabil olan 34 hasta, izole abdominal solid organ yaralanması olan 17 (Grup I) ve ek olarak ekstraabdominal yaralanması olan 17 hasta (Grup II) şeklinde iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Her iki grupta yaş, cins, kan basınçları, nabız dakika sayıları, yaralanma etyolojileri, abdominal solid organ yaralanma dereceleri, kan transfüzyonu sayısı, mortalite, mortalite oranları ve hastanede kalış süreleri, konservatif tedavi başarı oranları karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Hastaların acil polikliniğimizdeki kan basınçları, nabız dakika sayıları ve abdominal solid organ yaralanma dereceleri, travma etyolojileri, konservatif tedavi sonuçları, yaş, cins, mortalite, mortalite oranları karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak gruplar arasında anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır. Hastanede kalış süresi ve kan transfüzyonu sayısı karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak Grup II'de Grup l'e göre anlamlı fark gözlenmiştir. Hiç-bir hastada içi boş organ yaralanması saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Kunt travma sonrası oluşan abdominal solid organ yaralanmalarında hemodinamisi stabil olan, içi boş organ yaralanması olmayan olgular ekstraabdominal yaralanmaları da olsa konservatif olarak tedavi edilebilirler. Ekstraabdominal yaralanmaların varlığı sadece kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacını ve hastanede kalış süresini arttırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİZ, F., YÜCEL, T., ERMERGEN, İ., GÜRDAL, Ö. S., GÖNÜLLÜ, D., YANKOL, Y. (2003). The comparison of the results of the conservative treatment between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal truma. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 23–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/324976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Smith SJ, Cooney RN, Mucha P: Nonoperative manage- ment of the ruptured spleen: a revalidation of criteria. Sur- gery. 1996; 120: 745-775
  2. Smith JS Jr, Wengrowitz DA, DeLong DS: Prospective validation of criteria, including age, for safe non-surgical ma- nagement of the ruptured spleen. J Trauma. 1992; 33: 363- 369
  3. Meredith JW, Young JS, Bowling J, et al: Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma: the exception or the rule? J Trauma. 1994; 36: 5429-5535
  4. Brasel KJ, DeLisle CM, Olson CJ, et al: Trends in the ma- nagement of hepatic injury. Am J Surg. 1997; 174: 674-677
  5. Carrillo EH, Platz A, Miller FB, et al: Non-operative ma- nagement of blunt hepatic trauma. Br J Surg. 1998; 85:461- 468
  6. Matthews LA, Smith EM, Spirnak JP: Nonoperative tre- atment of major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extrava- sation. J Urol. 1997; 157: 2056-2058
  7. Croce MA, Fabian TC, Menke PG, et al: Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of cho- ice for hemodynamically stable patients. Ann Surg. 1995; 221: 744-755
  8. Godley CD, Warren RL, Sheridan RL, et al: Nonoperati- ve management of blunt splenic injury in adults: age over 55 years as a powerful indicator for failure. J Am Coll Surg. 1996; 183: 133-138
  9. Esposito TJ, Gamelli RL: Injury to the spleen. In Felici- ono DV, Moore EE, Mattox KL, eds. Trauma. 3rd ed. Stam- ford, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1996: pp 538-539
  10. Coburn MC, Pfeifer J, DeLuca FG: Nonoperative ma- nagement of splenic and hepatic trauma in the multiple inju- red pediatric and adolescent patient. Arch Surg. 1995; 130: 332-338
  11. Sartorelli KH, Frumiento C, Rogers FB, et al: Nonope- rative management of hepatic, splenic and renal injures in a- dults with multipl injuries. J Trauma. 2000; 49: 56-61
  12. Barone JE, Burns G, Svehlak SA, et al: Management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years. Sout- hern Connecticut Regional Trauma Quality Assurance Com- mitee. J Trauma. 1999; 46: 87-90
  13. Gaunt WT, McCarthy MC, Lambert CS, et al: Traditio- nal criteria for observation of splenic trauma should be chal- lenged. Am Surg. 1999; 65: 689-691
  14. Peterson NE: Genitourinary trauma. In Feliciano DV,Moore EE, Mattox KL, eds. Trauma. 3rd ed. Stamford, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1996: pp 668-671
  15. Moudouni SM, Hadj Slimen M, Manunta A, et al: Ma- nagement of major blunt renal lacerations: is a nonoperative approach indicated? Eur Urol. 2001; 40: 409-414
  16. Danuser H, Wille S, Zoscher G, et al: