Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of repair techniques in rat duodenal perforations; simple closure, simple closure and omentoplasty, and fibrin tissue adhesive

Duodenum perforasyonlarında basit kapama ve omentoplasti, basit kapama ve fibrin yapıştırıcıyla onarım yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması: Deneysel çalışma

Pages
11–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION:Fibrin tissue adhesives may have an application in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforations, as an adjunct to laparoscopic or open surgical methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: We compared three repair techniques, namely, simple closure and omentoplasty, simple closure alone, and fibrin tissue adhesive, in the treatment of rat duodenal perforations induced in the postpyloric region.METHODS Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats (210-240 g) were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Under ketamine and ether anesthesia, duodenal perforations of 2 mm were" induced in all rats in the postpyloric region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION:Fibrin tissue adhesives may have an application in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforations, as an adjunct to laparoscopic or open surgical methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Peptik ülser perforasyonu · Duodenum ülseri · Hidroksiprolin

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared three repair techniques, namely, simple closure and omentoplasty, simple closure alone, and fibrin tissue adhesive, in the treatment of rat duodenal perforations induced in the postpyloric region.METHODS Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats (210-240 g) were included. Under ketamine and ether anesthesia, duodenal perforations of 2 mm were" induced in all rats in the postpyloric region. The rats were assigned to three groups equal in number, which underwent repair with the use of simple closure and omentoplasty, simple closure alone, and fibrin glue, respectively. All the animals were sacrificed under deep ether anesthesia on the fourth postoperative day. To assess wound strength, bursting pressure measurements were performed. In addition, hydroxyproline content of the wound site was measured by absorbance spectrophotometry at 560 nm. RESULTS:The mean bursting pressure in the simple closure and omentoplasty group was significantly higher than those of the simple closure (p<0.05) and fibrin glue (p<0.001) groups. No significant difference existed between the simple closure and fibrin glue groups in this respect (p>0.05). Hydroxyproline values of the simple closure and omentoplasty (p<0.05) and simple closure (p<0.001) groups were signifıcantly lower than that of the fibrin glue group. CONCLUSION:Fibrin tissue adhesives may have an application in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforations, as an adjunct to laparoscopic or open surgical methods.

Özet

AMAÇ: Sıçanlarda, deneysel olarak duodenumun postpilorik bölgesinde oluşturulan perforasyonların tedavisinde basit kapama ve omentoplasti, basit kapama ve fibrin yapıştırıcıyla onarım yöntemleri karşılaştırıldı. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmada Sprague-Dawley cinsi, ağırlıkları 210-240 gr arasında değişen 30 adet erkek sıçan kullanıldı. Tüm deneklerde standart olarak, ketamin ve eter anestezisi altında duodenumun postpilorik alanında 2 mm çapında perforasyon oluşturuldu. Perforasyonlar, her biri 10 sıçandan oluşan üç grupta sırasıyla basit kapama ve omentoplasti, basit kapama ve fibrin yapıştırıcı ile onarıldı. Ameliyattan dört gün sonra sıçanların yaşanılan derin eter anestezisiyle sonlandırıldı. Yara iyileşmesini değerlendirmek için patlama basınç ölçümleri yapıldı; yara bölgesindeki hidroksiprolin içeriği 560 nm'de absorbans spektrofotometri ile ölçüldü. Basit kapama ve omentoplasti grubunda patlama basınçları, basit kapama (p 0.05). Basit kapama ve omentoplasti grubu (p<0.05) ile basit kapama grubunda (p<0.001) saptanan hidroksiprolin değerleri, fibrin yapıştırıcı grubundan anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu. SONUÇ: Duedonal ülser perforasyonlarmın tedavisinde, uygun olgularda kullanılabilecek olan fibrin yapıştırıcıları, laparoskopik ve açık cerrahi tedavi seçenekleri arasında yer alabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, C., DEMİR, U., COŞKUN, H., KALYONCU, A., GÜNDÜZ, B., EROĞLU, T., AĞCA, B., MİHMANLI, M. (2004). Comparison of repair techniques in rat duodenal perforations; simple closure, simple closure and omentoplasty, and fibrin tissue adhesive. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 11–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/324911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sonnenberg A. Temporal trends and geographical variations of peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995;9 Suppl 2:3-12
  2. Turner WW Jr, Thompson WM Jr, Thal ER. Perforated gastric ulcers. A plea for management by simple clo- sures. Arch Surg 1988;123:960-4
  3. Graham DY, Tabibian N, Schwartz JT, Smith JL. Evaluation of the effectiveness of through-the-scope bal- loons as dilators of benign and malignant gastrointestinal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1987;33:432-5
  4. Mihmanli M, Isgor A, Kabukcuoglu F, Turkay B, Cikla B, Baykan A. The effect of H. pylori in perforation of duodenal ulcer. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:1610-2
  5. Büyükuncu Y. Peptik ülser komplikasyonlar› ve cerrahi tedavileri. In: Gökflen Y, editör. Selim özofagus, mide, duodonum ve ince barsak hastal›klar›
  6. Uzmanl›k Son- ras› E¤itim Kursu. Eresin, ‹stanbul: 1999. s. 69-87
  7. Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1995;82:814-6
  8. Gustavsson S, Kelly KA, Melton LJ 3rd, Zinsmeister AR. Trends in peptic ulcer surgery. A population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1956-1985. Gastroenterology 1988; 94:688-94
  9. McConnell DB, Baba GC, Deveney CW. Changes in sur- gical treatment of peptic ulcer disease within a veterans hospital in the 1970s and the 1980s. Arch Surg 1989;124: 1164-7
  10. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Ohtonen P, Laitinen SO. Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perfo- rated peptic ulcers. Eur J Surg 2002;168:446-51
  11. George RL, Smith IF. Long-term results after omental patch repair in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers: a 5- to 10-year follow-up study. Can J Surg 1991;34: 447-9
  12. Kivirikko KI, Laitinen O, Prockop DJ. Modifications of a specific assay for hydroxyproline in urine. Anal Biochem 1967;19:249-55
  13. Feldman M, Richardson CT. Total 24-hour gastric acid secretion in patients with duodenal ulcer. Comparison with normal subjects and effects of cimetidine and pari- etal cell vagotomy. Gastroenterology 1986;90:540-4
  14. Noguiera C, Silva AS, Santos JN, Silva AG, Ferreira J, Matos E, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality. World J Surg 2003;27:782-7
  15. Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM, Blum A, Gillet M. Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perfo- ration. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:411-4
  16. Stemberger A, Blümel G. Teheoretische aspecte der fib- rinklebung. I