Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Yüksek riskli travma ve cerrahi yoğun bakım hastalarında venöz tromboembolizmi önlemede pnömatik kompresyon uygulaması

Intermittent pneumatic compression in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk trauma and surgical ICU patients

Pages
38–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONS: IPC seems to be an effective and a safe modality in preventing both DVT and PE in high-risk ICU patients with severe trauma and for those undergoing major surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermittent pneumatic compression methods (IPC) in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk patients followed in our intensive care unit (ICU) for whom anticoagulation is contraindicated due to high risk of bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between October 2001 and June 2002 at the Trauma and Surgical Emergency Service of Istanbul Medical Faculty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONS: IPC seems to be an effective and a safe modality in preventing both DVT and PE in high-risk ICU patients with severe trauma and for those undergoing major surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İleriye dönük çalışma · Tromboembolizim · Aralıklı pnömatik basınç aletleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermittent pneumatic compression methods (IPC) in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk patients followed in our intensive care unit (ICU) for whom anticoagulation is contraindicated due to high risk of bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between October 2001 and June 2002 at the Trauma and Surgical Emergency Service of Istanbul Medical Faculty. Thirty eight surgical ICU patients who used IPC devices for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolisim were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 27 male (71%) and 11 female patients (29%) with a mean age of 49.69 ± 18.61 years. Their diagnoses were as follows; 21 multi-trauma, 11 major abdominal surgery, 11 severe gastrointestinal bleeding. None of the patients had manifested DVT by venous duplex scans. A leg swelling was present in one patient without evidence of DVT by duplex scans. Symptomatic and fatal pulmonary embolism were not detected. Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism was detected by spiral thorax CT examination in one patient (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: IPC seems to be an effective and a safe modality in preventing both DVT and PE in high-risk ICU patients with severe trauma and for those undergoing major surgery.

Özet

AMAÇ Bu çalışmada, kanama riski nedeniyle antikoagülasyon tedavisi kontrendike olan ve cerrahi yoğun bakım ünitesinde takip edilen otuz sekiz hastada aralıklı pnömatik kompresyonun (IPC) derin ven trombozunu (DVT) ve pulmoner emboliyi (PE) önlemedeki güvenirliliği ve etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Bu çalışma Ekim 2001-Haziran 2002 tarihleri arasında İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Acil Cerrahi ve Travma servisinde yürütüldü. Otuz sekiz yoğun bakim hastası na venoz tromboemboli profilaksisi için aralıklı pnömatik kompresyon uygulanıp sonuçlar değerlendirildi. BULGULAR Aralıklı pnömatik kompresyon sonuçlarımızı değerlendirmeyi amaçladığımız bu çalışmaya 27 (%71) erkek ve 77(%29) kadın hasta alınmıştır. Yaş ortalamaları 49.69 ±18.61 yıl: Hastaların 21’i multi-travma, 11’i majör karın cerrahisi. 6’sı ciddi gastrointestinal sistem kanaması geçirmişti. Hiçbir hastada dupleks sintigrafiyle derin ven trombozu tespit edilemedi. Bir hastada dupleks sintigrafisinde derin ven trombozu bulgusu yok iken bacakta ödem mevcuttu. Semptomatik ya da ölümcül pulmoner emboli izlenmedi. Bir hastada spiral toraks bilgisayarlı tomografi ile asemptomatik akciğer embolisi tespit edildi. SONUÇ Bulgularımız ve literatür bilgilerinin ışığı altında ciddi travma ve büyük cerrahi girişim geçirmiş olması nedeniyle yoğun bakım ünitesinde takip edilen riskli hastalarda aralıklı pnömotik kompresyonun, derin ven trombozu ve akciğer embolisini önlenmede etkin ve güvenli bir yöntem olduğu sonucuna varmış bulunmaktayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTOĞLU, M. H., GÜLOĞLU, R., ERTEKİN, C., TAVİLOĞLU, K., ALİMOĞLU, O. (2005). Yüksek riskli travma ve cerrahi yoğun bakım hastalarında venöz tromboembolizmi önlemede pnömatik kompresyon uygulaması. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 38–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/324877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Dennis JW, Menawat S, Von Thron J, et al. Efficacy of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma patients and identification of high-risk groups. J Trauma. 1993; 35: 132-9
  2. Sekharan J, Dennis JW, Miranda FE, et al. Long-term follow-up of prophylactic green field filters in multisys¬ tem trauma patients. J Trauma. 2001; 51; 1087-91
  3. Ramos R, Salem BI, De Pawlikowski MP, et al. The effi¬ cacy of pneumatic compression stockings in the preven¬ tion of pulmonary embolism after cardiac surgery. Chest. 1996: !09: 82-5 4. Geerts WH. Jay RM, Code KJ, et at. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboemholism after major trauma. NEngl J Med. 1996: 335: 701-7
  4. Shackford SR, Davis JW, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, et al. Venous thromhoemholism in patients with major trau¬ ma. Am J Surg, 1990; 159: 365-9
  5. Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidence- based report—part II: analysis of risk factors and evalu¬ ation of the role of vena cava! filters. J Trauma. 2000; 49: 140-4
  6. Hooker J A. Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. Efficacy of pro¬ phylaxis against thromhoemholisiii with intermittent pneumatic compression after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999: 81: 690-6
  7. Osier G Tuden RL, Colditz GA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in major orthopedic surgery. JAMA. 1987: 257: 203-8 9. Marik PE, Andrews L, Maim B. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in ICU patients. Chest. 1997: 111: 661-4. 10 Hirsch OR, Ingenito EP, Goldhaber SZ. Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis among pal tents in medical intensive care. JAMA. 1995: 274: 335-7
  8. Cade JF. High risk of the critically ill for venous throm¬ boembolism. Crit Care Med. !982: 10: 448f50 12. Knudson MM, Lewis FR, Clinton A, et al. Prevention of venous thromhoembotism in trauma patients. J Tr'auma. 1994,37:480-7
  9. Kurtoglu M, Buyukkurt CD, Dural AC, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low molecuJar weight heparins in polytraumatized patients in intensive care unit (Article in Turkish). Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2001; 17: 233-42
  10. K.essler CM, Hirsch OR, Jacobs H, el at. Intermittent pneumatic compression in chronic venous insufficiency favorably affects fihrino/vlic potential ana platelet acti¬ vation Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1996; 7: 437-46
  11. Davidson JE, Willms DC, Hoffman MS. Effect of inter¬ mitt