Journals / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Kırık iyileşmesi üzerine florokinolonların etkilerinin karşılaştırılması (Sıçanlar üzerinde deneysel bir çalışma)

A comparison of effects of floroquinolones on fracture healing (An experimental study in rats)

Pages
17–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONS: The current histopathological study has shown that all the studied floroquinolones retarded fracture healing in rats.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to test and compare the effect of floroquinolones on fracture healing as assessed histopathologically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and the last group were treated with norfloxacin (N), ofloxacin (O), pefloxacin (P) and ciprofloxacin (Ci) respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONS: The current histopathological study has shown that all the studied floroquinolones retarded fracture healing in rats.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Florokinolonlar · Kırık iyileşmesi · Sıçan

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to test and compare the effect of floroquinolones on fracture healing as assessed histopathologically. METHODS: A total of twenty five Wistar rats were arbitrarily assigned to five groups with five animals each. Bilateral closed femoral fracture was constructed manually in all groups. The first group did not receive any drug as control (C). The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and the last group were treated with norfloxacin (N), ofloxacin (O), pefloxacin (P) and ciprofloxacin (Ci) respectively. Antibiotic administration was started on the 7th day after the fracture incident. All the treatments were discontinued twenty days after the incident all the rats were sacrificed , and the fracture calluses together with affected femurs were resected en bloc at the fourth week after fracture. RESULTS: Average healing grades of control group was higher than all the other antibiotic groups. Mean healing grades of control ( 5 ; n:8), ofloxacin (4.1; n:7), ciprofloxacin (3.9; n:8), norfloxacin (3.4 ; n:9) and pefloxacin groups (2.6 ; n:10) were recorded.. Statistically significant differences between antibiotherapy groups ( excluding. norfloxacin) and the control group were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The current histopathological study has shown that all the studied floroquinolones retarded fracture healing in rats.

Özet

AMAÇ Çalışmanın amacı, florokinolonların oluşturulan femur kırıkları üzerine etkilerini histopatolojik olarak test etmek ve karşılaştırmaktır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Her bir grupta beşer denek olmak üzere toplam yirmi beş Wistar sıçanı beş gruba ayrıldı. Tüm gruplarda manuel olarak bilateral femur kırığı oluşturuldu. Kontrol (C) grubu olarak, ilk gruba herhangi bir ilaç verilmedi. İkinci grup norfloksasinle (N), üçüncü grup ofloksasinle (O), dördüncü grup pefloksasinle (P) ve son grup da siprofloksasinle (C) tedaviye alındı. İndüktlenen femur kırıkları sonrası yedinci günde antibiyotik tedavisine başlandı. Tüm gruplarda tedaviye yirminci gün son verildi. Femur kırıklarının indüksiyonundan dört hafta sonra tüm sıçanlar aşırı doz eter ile feda edildi ve femurlar kallus dokusuyla birlikte blok halinde çıkarılarak histopatolojik olarak değerlendirmeye alındı. BULGULAR Kontrol grubunda kırıkların ortalama iyileşme derecesinin tüm diğer antibiyotik gruplarından yüksek olduğu bulundu. Grupların ortalama iyileşme dereceleri sırasıyla, kontrolde 5 (n:8), ofloksasinde 4.1 (n:7), siprofloksasinde 3.9 (n:8), norfloksasinde 3.4 (n:9) ve pefloksasinde 2.6 (n:10) olarak saptandı. Kontrol ve norfloksasin grubu dışında tüm antibiyotik grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmakla birlikte değişken farklılıklar olduğu saptandı. SONUÇ Kinolon grubu antibiyotiklerin kırık iyileşmesini etkilerini saptamak amacıyla Wistar sıçanlarında yaptığımız çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm florokinolon grubu antibiyotiklerin kontrol grubuna göre histopatolojik olarak kırık iyileşmesini anlamlı derecede geciktirdiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCAY, İ., ÖZBEK, H., KÖSEM, M., ÜNAL, Ö. (2005). Kırık iyileşmesi üzerine florokinolonların etkilerinin karşılaştırılması (Sıçanlar üzerinde deneysel bir çalışma). Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 17–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/324858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Schaad UB, abdus Salam H, Aujard Y, et al.: Use of flu- oroquinolones in pediatrics: consensus report of an International Society of Chemotherapy commission. Pediat. Infect. Dis. J. 1995; 14: 1-9
  2. Mont MA, Mathur SK, Frondoza CG, et al.: The effects of ciprofloxacin on human chondrocy{es in cell culture. Infection 1996; 24:151-5
  3. Takada S, Kato M, Takayama S: Comparison of lesions induced by intra-articular injections of quinolones and compounds damaging cartilage components in rat femoral condyles. J. Toxicol. And Environ. Health, 1994; 42: 73-88
  4. Tatsumi H, Senda H, Yatera S, et al.: Toxicological stud¬ ies on pipemidic acid. V Effect on diarthrodial joints of experimental animals. J. Toxicol. Sci. 1978; 3: 357-67
  5. Schaad UB, Wedgwood-Krucko J: Nalidixic acid in chil-, dren: retrospective matched controlled study for cartilage ■ toxicity. Infection 1987; 15: 165-8
  6. Stahlmann R, Merker HJ, Hinz N, et al.: Ofloxacin in juvenile non-human primates and rats, arthropathia and drug plasma concentrations. Arch. Toxicol. 1990; 64: 193-204
  7. Chysky V, Kapila K, Hullmann R, et al.: Safety of ciprofloxacin in children: worldwide clinical experience based on compassionate use. Emphasis on joint evalua¬ tion. Infection 1991; 19: 289-96
  8. Huddlestone PM, Steckelberg JM, Hanssen AD, et al.; Ciprofloxacin inhibition of experimental fracture-heal¬ ing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am 2000; 82: 161-73
  9. Bendele AM, Hulman JF, Harvey AK, et al.: Passive ro] of articular chondrocytes in quinolone-induced arthropj thy in guinea pigs. Toxicol. Pathol. 1990; 18: 304-12
  10. Burkhardt JE, Hill MA, Carlton WW: Morphologic an biomechanical changes in articular cartilages of imrm ture beagle dogs dosed with difloxacin. Toxicol. Patho 1992; 29: 246-52
  11. Janknegt R: Fluoroquinolones, adverse reactions reac tions during clinical trials and postmarketing surveil lance. Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1989; 11: 124-7
  12. Burkhardt JE, Hill MA, Turek JJ, et al.: Ultrastructura changes in articular cartilages of immature beagle dog dosed with difloxacin, a fluoroquinolone. Vet Patho] 1992; 29: 230-8
  13. Kato M, Onodera T: Morphological investigation of cav ity formation in articular cartilage induced by ofloxacii in rats. Fundam Appl. Toxicol. 1997; 11: 110-9
  14. Barrett JF, Gootz TD, McGuirk PR, et al.: Use of in vita topoisomerase II assays for studying quinolone antibac terial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989; 33 1697-703
  15. Castora FJ, Vissering FF, Simpson MV: Th