Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Vascular injury following supracondylar humerus fractures in children

Çocuklarda suprakondiller humerus kırığı sonrası damarsal yaralanmalar

Pages
84–89
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One patient underwent primary suture, and the other two were managed with saphenous vein graft and primary repair.DISCUSSION: It is vital to re-evaluate patients presenting with a pulseless hand following supracondylar humerus fracture; the ones with no ische-mia or ischemic sign should be closely followed, and the ones retaining ischemic signs should be managed with primary vascular repair.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the children with absent distal pulses following supracondylar humerus fractures.METHODS: Forty-two pulseless hand patients who were treated due to supracondylar humerus fractures were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The evaluation included symptoms presented at preoperative and postoperative neurological examinations, mechanism of injury, time from injury to presentation, time from injury to surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.RESULTS: In 27 patients, radial pulse was palpated following reduction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One patient underwent primary suture, and the other two were managed with saphenous vein graft and primary repair.DISCUSSION: It is vital to re-evaluate patients presenting with a pulseless hand following supracondylar humerus fracture; the ones with no ische-mia or ischemic sign should be closely followed, and the ones retaining ischemic signs should be managed with primary vascular repair.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the children with absent distal pulses following supracondylar humerus fractures.METHODS: Forty-two pulseless hand patients who were treated due to supracondylar humerus fractures were evaluated retrospectively. The evaluation included symptoms presented at preoperative and postoperative neurological examinations, mechanism of injury, time from injury to presentation, time from injury to surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.RESULTS: In 27 patients, radial pulse was palpated following reduction. A stream was identified in ten patients with Doppler, and no stream was identified in two patients. These two patients had no ischemia and they presented with a stream on Doppler one day after the surgery. Immediate vascular exploration was applied in three patients (7%) who retained ischemia after the reduction and was unable to present a stream on Doppler. One patient underwent primary suture, and the other two were managed with saphenous vein graft and primary repair.DISCUSSION: It is vital to re-evaluate patients presenting with a pulseless hand following supracondylar humerus fracture; the ones with no ische-mia or ischemic sign should be closely followed, and the ones retaining ischemic signs should be managed with primary vascular repair.

Özet

AMAÇ: Çocuk suprakondiller humerus kırığı sonrası ekstremite distalinde nabız alınamayan hastaların sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Suprakondiler humerus kırığı sonrası ekstremite distalinde nabız alınamayan 42 hasta geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Bu hastaların ortalama yaşı 7.3 (dağılım, 5-14 yaş) yıl idi. Hastaların 27'si (%64) erkek 15'i (%36) kızdı. Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası nörolojik muayene bulguları, yaralanma şekli, yaralanma ile hastaneye başvuru arasında geçen süre ve ameliyata alınma zamanı, hastanede kalma süresi ve ameliyat sonrası görülen komplikasyonlar açısından hastalar değerlendirildi.BULGULAR: Tüm hastalarda Gartland tip 3 kırık mevcuttu. Yirmi yedi hastada redüksiyon sonrası radial nabız palpe edilmeye başlandı. On hastada sadece Doppler ile belirlenen akım mevcut iken, iki hastada akım alınamadı. Dolaşım bozukluğu olmayan bu iki hastada da ameliyattan bir gün sonra Doppler ile akım alınmaya başlandı. Redüksiyon sonrası dolaşım bozukluğu devam eden ve Doppler ultrasonografi ile akım alınamayan diğer üç (%7) hastaya acil vasküler eksplorasyon uygulandı. Bir hastaya primer sütürasyon, diğer iki hastaya ise safen greft ile tamir uygulandı.SONUÇ: Suprakondiller humerus kırığına bağlı nabızsız el gelişen hastalar, redüksiyon sonrası yeniden değerlendirilmeli; ekstremite dolaşımı düzelenler ve dolaşım bozuluğu bulguları olmayanlar için sadece yakın takip, dolaşım bozukluğu devam edenlere ise damar tamiri yapılmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKUL, E., GEM, M., ALEMDAR, C., ARSLAN, H., AZBOY, İ., ÇELİK, V. (2016). Vascular injury following supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 84–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/324851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Lam PK. A 10-year study of the changes in the pattern and treatment of 6,493 fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:344-50.
  2. Schoenecker PL, Delgado E, Rotman M, Sicard GA, Capelli AM. Pulse- less arm in association with totally displaced supracondylar fracture. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10:410-5.
  3. Choi PD, Melikian R, Skaggs DL. Risk factors for vascular repair and compartment syndrome in the pulseless supracondylar humerus fracture in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30:50-6.
  4. Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI. Management of displaced exten- sion-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:641-50.
  5. Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Emans JB, Rand FF. Management of vascular inju- ries in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures without arteriography. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:25-9.
  6. Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, King RE. Fractures in children. Vol. 3. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 526-617.
  7. Shuck JM, Omer GE Jr, Lewis CE Jr. Arterial obstruction due to intimal disruption in extremity fractures. J Trauma 1972;12:481-9.
  8. Blakey CM, Biant LC, Birch R. Ischaemia and the pink, pulseless hand complicating supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: long- term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1487-92.
  9. Sabharwal S, Tredwell SJ, Beauchamp RD, Mackenzie WG, Jakubec DM, Cairns R, et al. Management of pulseless pink hand in pediatric supracondylar fractures of humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:303-10.
  10. Garbuz DS, Leitch K, Wright JG. The treatment of supracondylar fractures in children with an absent radial pulse. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:594-6.
  11. Malviya A, Simmons D, Vallamshetla R, Bache CE. Pink pulseless hand following supra-condylar fractures: an audit of British practice. J Pediatr Orthop B 2006;15:62-4.
  12. Mangat KS, Martin AG, Bache CE. The 'pulseless pink' hand after supra- condylar fracture of the humerus in children: the predictive value of nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1521-5.
  13. Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Mitsionis GI, Kontogeorgakos VA, Ma- noudis G, Beris AE. Treatment of pink pulseless hand following supra- condylar fractures of the humerus in children. Int Orthop 2009;33:237- 41. Copley LA, Dormans JP, Davidson RS. Vascular injuries and their se- quelae in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: toward a goal of pre- vention. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:99-103.
  14. Louahem DM, Nebunescu A, Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Neurovascular complications and severe displacement in supracondylar hu