Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 5

Ankaferd Blood Stopper’in karın içi kullanımı periton içi yapışıklık oluşumunu arttırır mı?

Does intraabdominal use of Ankaferd Blood Stopper cause increased intraperitoneal adhesions?

Pages
383–389
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Intraperitoneal administration of ABS has no toxic effects on blood chemistry or the lungs, kidneys and the liver, but it has some minor adverse effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate whether intraabdominal Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) causes increased intraabdominal adhesion formation and to determine any side effects of ABS in vivo.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Intraperitoneal adhesions were assessed macroscopically and histopathologically on the 10th postoperative day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Intraperitoneal administration of ABS has no toxic effects on blood chemistry or the lungs, kidneys and the liver, but it has some minor adverse effects.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate whether intraabdominal Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) causes increased intraabdominal adhesion formation and to determine any side effects of ABS in vivo. METHODS The present experimental study was designed to examine the effects of Ankaferd solution on peritoneal adhesion formation in a rat model of cecal abrasion. Intraperitoneal adhesions were assessed macroscopically and histopathologically on the 10th postoperative day. The possible adverse affects of ABS on liver and lung tissues were analyzed histopathologically, and blood chemistry was also evaluated. RESULTS Our study revealed that ABS reduced intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental rat model. The blood chemistry was not disturbed due to ABS administration. Intraperitoneal administration of ABS led to some minor changes in the lungs and serosal surfaces of the intestines, with minor architectural changes in the liver that were not considered as toxic. Further studies with various application doses and routes with more detailed cellular analysis are thus warranted to clarify the possible pleiotropic and adverse effects of this new agent away from hemostasis. CONCLUSION There was less intraperitoneal adhesion formation in the ABS group than in the control group and saline group. Intraperitoneal administration of ABS has no toxic effects on blood chemistry or the lungs, kidneys and the liver, but it has some minor adverse effects.

Özet

AMAÇ Bu çalışmanın amacı, karın içi kullanılan Ankaferd Blood Stopper’in (ABS) periton içi yapışıklık oluşumunu arttırıp arttırmadığını ve in vivo kullanıma bağlı majör toksik etkilerini irdelemektir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Bu deneysel çalışma, çekal abrazyon uygulanan sıçan modelinde Ankaferd solüsyonunun periton içi yapışıklık oluşumu üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek üzere dizayn edildi. Periton içi yapışıklıklar cerrahi uygulama sonrası 10. gün makroskopik ve histopatolojik inceleme ile belirlendi. Yan etki varlığını irdelemek için kan, akciğer ve karaciğer dokuları alındı. BULGULAR Ankaferd Blood Stopper’in kullanımı ile karın içi yapışıklık oluşumunun azaldığı görüldü. ABS uygulanmasının kan biyokimyasal incelemelerinde herhangi bir bozulmaya neden olmadığı saptandı. Ancak akciğerlerde ve bağırsakların serozal yüzeylerinde akut ve kronik enflamatuvar değişiklikler ve karaciğerde minör yapısal değişiklikler izlendi. Bu değişikliklerin hiçbiri toksik değişiklik olarak değerlendirilmedi. ABS’nin diğer etkilerinin belirlenmesi için farklı dozlarda ve farklı klinik senaryolarda ileri çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. SONUÇ Periton içi yapışıklık oluşumu ABS uygulanan grupta kontrol grubu ve SF grubuna kıyasla daha az görüldü. İntraperitoneal ABS kullanıma bağlı olarak herhangi bir toksik etki saptanmamakla birlikte bazı minör değişiklikler gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CÖMERT, M., KARAKAYA, K., BARUT, F., ÇAKMAK, K. G., UÇAN, H. B., GÜLTEKİN, F. A., EMRE, A. U., TAŞCILAR, Ö., İRKÖRÜCÜ, O., ANKARALI, H. (2010). Ankaferd Blood Stopper’in karın içi kullanımı periton içi yapışıklık oluşumunu arttırır mı?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 5, 383–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/324832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ellis H. The clinical signifcance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997:5-9
  2. Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, Sunderland G, Thompson JN, Clark DN, et al. Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion-related complications. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:506-11
  3. Menzies D. Peritoneal adhesions. Incidence, cause, and prevention. Surg Annu 1992;24:27-45
  4. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesionshow big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:60-3
  5. Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, Barrese I. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:672-4
  6. Chapron C, Pierre F, Harchaoui Y, Lacroix S, Béguin S, Querleu D, et al. Gastrointestinal injuries during gynaeco- logical laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 1999;14:333-7
  7. Mecke H, Heuchmer R, Lehmann-Willenbrock E. Complications in 5,000 pelviscopies at the Kiel University Gynecologic Clinic. [Article in German] Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1996;56:449-52. [Abstract] 8. Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, van Goor H. Recent clinical developments in pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal adhesions. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 2000;232:52-9
  8. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476-80
  9. Karakaya K, Ucan HB, Tascilar O, Emre AU, Cakmak GK, Irkorucu O, et al. Evaluation of a new hemostatic agent Ankaferd Blood Stopper in experimental liver laceration. J Invest Surg 2009;22:201-6
  10. Goker H, Haznedaroglu IC, Ercetin S, Kirazli S, Akman U, Ozturk Y, et al. Haemostatic actions of the folkloric medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper. J Int Med Res 2008;36:163-70
  11. Aarons CB, Cohen PA, Gower A, Reed KL, Leeman SE, Stucchi AF, et al. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fbrinolytic activity. Ann Surg 2007;245:176-84
  12. Grahame GR,Torchida MG, Dankewich KA, et al. Surfaceactive material in peritoneal effuent of CAPD patients. Perit Dial Bull 1985;5:109-11
  13. Dinc S, Ozaslan C, Kuru B, Karaca S, Ustun H, Alagol H, et al. Methylene blue prevents surgery-induced peritoneal adhesions but impairs the early phase of anastomotic wound healing. Can J Surg 2006;49:321-8
  14. Vrijland WW, Tseng LN, Eijkman HJ, Hop WC, Jakimowicz JJ, Leguit P, et al. Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions