SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Fundus-first technique and partial cholecystectomy for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies

İSMAİL CEM SORMAZ
Yiğit SOYTAŞ
Ali Fuat Kaan GÖK
İLKER ÖZGÜR
Levent AVTAN
Pages
66–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, in complicated cases where anatomic uncertainties are dominant, the performance of FF technique or LPC may decrease conversion rates to open surgery and contribute to accomplishing the laparoscopic intervention safely

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the impact of conversion from retrograde dissection to fundus-first technique (FF) or laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) on complication rates, operation time, and duration of hospitalization.METHODS: The medical records of 210 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In cases of difficulty in dissection of critical view of safety , the operation strategy was first converted to FF and then to LPC when FF was considered insufficient for safe cholecystectomy.RESULTS: Of the 210 cases, LC was initiated and completed with RD in 197 cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in complicated cases where anatomic uncertainties are dominant, the performance of FF technique or LPC may decrease conversion rates to open surgery and contribute to accomplishing the laparoscopic intervention safely
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the impact of conversion from retrograde dissection to fundus-first technique (FF) or laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) on complication rates, operation time, and duration of hospitalization.METHODS: The medical records of 210 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. All laparoscopic cholecystectomies were initiated with retrograde dissection (RD). In cases of difficulty in dissection of critical view of safety , the operation strategy was first converted to FF and then to LPC when FF was considered insufficient for safe cholecystectomy.RESULTS: Of the 210 cases, LC was initiated and completed with RD in 197 cases. FF was implemented in 13 cases due to difficulties in dissection. In the FF group, laparoscopic total cholecystectomy was successfully accomplished in seven patients, and LPC was performed in the remaining six cases. Three postoperative complications occurred in the RD group and two in the LPC group. No major intraoperative complications or perioperative mortality occurred in any patients.CONCLUSION: In elective, noncomplicated cases, the safe posterior window (critical view of safety) principle should be implemented. However, in complicated cases where anatomic uncertainties are dominant, the performance of FF technique or LPC may decrease conversion rates to open surgery and contribute to accomplishing the laparoscopic intervention safely

🔖

Cite This Article

SORMAZ, İ. C., SOYTAŞ, Y., GÖK, A. F. K., ÖZGÜR, İ., AVTAN, L. (2018). Fundus-first technique and partial cholecystectomy for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 66–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/324801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89–94
  2. Kato K, Kasai S, Matsuda M, Onodera K, Kato J, Imai M, et al. A new technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 81 cases. Endoscopy 1996;28:356–9
  3. Henneman D, da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM. Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2013;27:351–8
  4. Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL. Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 2009;197:781–4
  5. Neri V, Ambrosi A, Fersini A, Tartaglia N, Valentino TP. Antegrade dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2007;11:225–8
  6. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H. Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2015;150:159–68
  7. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:132–8
  8. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006;93:40–5
  9. Perissat J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience. Am J Surg 1993;165:444–9
  10. Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:191–8
  11. Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 1994;81:1362–5
  12. Araujo-Teixeira JP, Rocha-Reis J, Costa-Cabral A, Barros H, Saraiva AC, Araujo-Teixeira AM. Laparoscopy or laparotomy in acute cholecystitis (200 cases). Comparison of the results and factors predictive of conversion. Chirurgie 1999;124:529–35
  13. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J. Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1997;173:513–7
  14. Mattioli FP, Cagnazzo A, Razzetta F, Bianchi C, Varaldo E, Campagna A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of the reasons for a conversion to conventional surgery in an elective surgery department. Minerva Chir 1999;54:471–6
  15. Parra Blanco JA, Bueno López J, Madrazo Leal C, Fariñas Alvarez C, Torre Carrasco F, Fariñas MC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of risk factors for predicti