Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 5

Penetran rektal yaralanmalarda morbiditeye etkili faktörler: Sivil deneyim

Factors affecting morbidity in penetrating rectal injuries: A civilian experience

Pages
401–406
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the awareness of both patients as well as physicians managing trauma about rectal injuries should be increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND The principles of the treatment of rectal injuries have been determined based on the experiences gained from military injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS The characteristics of 29 inpatients who had been treated due to rectal injuries caused by gunshot wounds and penetrating devices were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the awareness of both patients as well as physicians managing trauma about rectal injuries should be increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND The principles of the treatment of rectal injuries have been determined based on the experiences gained from military injuries. While adopting these principles in civilian life, it is essential to know the characteristics of civilian rectal injuries as well as the risk factors affecting morbidity. METHODS The characteristics of 29 inpatients who had been treated due to rectal injuries caused by gunshot wounds and penetrating devices were evaluated. In order to determine the risk factors, the patients were divided into two groups regarding the presence of morbidity (Group 1, with morbidity; Group 2, without morbidity) and compared. RESULTS Severe fecal contamination, perianal or gluteal injuries, duration of trauma- treatment interval, and isolated extraperitoneal injury were significant factors that affected the development of morbidity. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group 1 as compared to Group 2. CONCLUSION Although rectal injuries are rarely encountered, they carry high morbidity and mortality. Awareness of the risk factors and planning of a patient-based treatment are essential for the success of the therapy. The rate of morbidity is substantially decreased when patients are treated in time. Thus, the awareness of both patients as well as physicians managing trauma about rectal injuries should be increased.

Özet

AMAÇ Rektal yaralanmaların tedavi prensipleri savaş deneyimlerine dayanmaktadır. Sivil yaralanmalarda bu prensipleri uygularken sivil rektal yaralanmaların özelliklerini ve bunun yanında morbiditeye etkili faktörleri bilmek gerekir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Ateşli silah ve delici-kesici aletle rektal yaralanma oluşmuş 29 hastanın özellikleri değerlendirildi. Risk faktörlerini belirlemek amacıyla hastalar morbidite olanlar ve olmayanlar şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı (morbidite olan: Grup 1, morbidite olmayan: Grup 2) ve faktörler gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı. BULGULAR Şiddetli fekal kontaminasyon, perianal veya gluteal yaralanma, travma tedavi intervali ve izole ekstraperitoneal yaralanma olması morbidite gelişimi üzerine etkili faktörlerdi. Hastanede kalış süresi Grup 1?de Grup 2 ile karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı derecede daha uzundu. SONUÇ Rektal yaralanmalarla nadiren karşılaşılmasına rağmen, morbidite ve mortalite oranları yüksektir. Risk faktörlerinin bilinmesi ve hastaya göre tedavi planı yapılması tedavinin başarısı için önemlidir. Zamanında tedavi edilen hastalarda morbidite oranı önemli ölçüde azalmaktadır. Bu nedenle, doktorların yanı sıra hastaların da rektal yaralanma konusunda bilinçli olması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞ, M., KAPAN, M., ÖNDER, A., BÖYÜK, A., GİRGİN, S., TAÇYILDIZ, İ. (2011). Penetran rektal yaralanmalarda morbiditeye etkili faktörler: Sivil deneyim. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 5, 401–406. https://ajindex.com/articles/324743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Demetriades D, Salim A. Colon and rectal trauma and rectal foreign bodies. In: Wolff BG, Fleshman JW, Beck DE, et al., editors. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007. p. 322-34
  2. Cleary RK, Pomerantz RA, Lampman RM. Colon and rectal injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1203-22
  3. Weinberg JA, Fabian TC, Magnotti LJ, Minard G, Bee TK, Edwards N, et al. Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome. J Trauma 2006;60:508-14
  4. Steele SR, Wolcott KE, Mullenix PS, Martin MJ, Sebesta JA, Azarow KS, et al. Colon and rectal injuries during Operation Iraqi Freedom: are there any changing trends in management or outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:870-7
  5. Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL. Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all? Ann Surg 1989;209:600-11
  6. Shatnawi NJ, Bani-Hani KE. Management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal injuries. Asian J Surg 2006;29:11-6
  7. Bostick PJ, Johnson DA, Heard JF, Islas JT, Sims EH, Fleming AW, et al. Management of extraperitoneal rectal injuries. J Natl Med Assoc 1993;85:460-3
  8. Navsaria PH, Graham R, Nicol A. A new approach to extraperitoneal rectal injuries: laparoscopy and diverting loop sigmoid colostomy. J Trauma 2001;51:532-5
  9. Navsaria PH, Shaw JM, Zellweger R, Nicol AJ, Kahn D. Diagnostic laparoscopy and diverting sigmoid loop colostomy in the management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries. Br J Surg 2004;91:460-4
  10. Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Falabella A, Demetriades D. Operative management of civilian rectal gunshot wounds: simpler is better. World J Surg 2000;24:114-8
  11. Navsaria PH, Edu S, Nicol AJ. Civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot wounds: surgical management made simpler. World J Surg 2007;31:1345-51
  12. Demirbaş S, Yildiz M, Uluutku AH, Kalemoğlu M, Kurt Y, Erenoğlu C, et al. Surgical treatment of ano-rectal gunshot injuries caused by low-velocity bullets. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2004;10:17-21
  13. Thomas DD, Levison MA, Dykstra BJ, Bender JS. Management of rectal injuries. Dogma versus practice. Am Surg 1990;56:507-10
  14. Ivatury RR, Licata J, Gunduz Y, Rao P, Stahl WM. Management options in penetrating rectal injuries. Am Surg 1991;57:50-5
  15. Levine JH, Longo WE, Pruitt C, Mazuski JE, Shapiro MJ, Durham RM. Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair. Am J Surg 1996;172:575-9
  16. Berne JD, Velmahos GC, Chan LS, Asensio JA, Demetriades D.