Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Penetran karın travmalarının tanısal lapararoskopi ile yönetimi: Prospektif randomize olmayan çalışma

The management of penetrating abdominal trauma by diagnostic laparoscopy: a prospective non-randomized study

Pages
53–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Selective use of DL in the hemodinamically stable patients with PAT effectively decreased the rate of negative laparotomies, minimized morbidity, and decreased hospital stay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: Penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) has been traditionally treated by exploratory laparotomy (EL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: 52 hemodynamically stable patients were admitted to the trauma service.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Selective use of DL in the hemodinamically stable patients with PAT effectively decreased the rate of negative laparotomies, minimized morbidity, and decreased hospital stay.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) has been traditionally treated by exploratory laparotomy (EL). The aim of our study was to examine the use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the management of hemodynamically stable patients with PAT. MATERIALS and METHODS: A prospective study was performed to compare the outcomes of hemodynamically stable patients with suspected intra-abdominal injuries due to abdominal stab wounds who underwent either EL or DL. Data extracted for analysis included demographic information, operative findings, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: 52 hemodynamically stable patients were admitted to the trauma service. There were 45 male (86.5 %) and 7 female (13.5 %); average age was 34, 5 years-old (18 &#8211; 60). 26 (50 %) patients underwent EL, and 26 (50 %) patients underwent DL. Re-exploration by laparotomy was required in 9 of the 26 cases (34, 6 %). Patients who underwent DL had significantly shorter hospital stay (1,82±0,63 days versus 5,4 ±2,1 days; P<0.05) and shorter operation time (17,9±6,38 versus 68,4±33,2 minutes; P <0.05) than patients who underwent EL. CONCLUSION: Selective use of DL in the hemodinamically stable patients with PAT effectively decreased the rate of negative laparotomies, minimized morbidity, and decreased hospital stay.

Özet

AMAÇ Penetran karın travmaları (PKT) geleneksel olarak tanısal laparotomi (TL) ile tedavi edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı hemodinamisi stabil olan PKT’li hastaların yönetiminde diyagnostik laparoskopi (DL) kullanımını incelemektir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Hemodinamisi stabil olan delici-kesici alete bağlı karın içi yaralanma şüphesi nedeniyle TL veya DL yapılan has- taların sonuçları prospektif olarak kayıt edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, ameliyat bulguları, hastanede kalış süresi, mortalite ve ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonları ir- delendi. BULGULAR Hemodinamisi stabil olan 52 PKT’li hasta travma servisine alındı. Hastaların 45’i (%86,5) erkek, 7’si kadın (%13,5) ve yaş ortalaması 34,5 idi (dağılım 18-60 yaş). Yirmi altı (%50) hastaya TL, 26 (%50) hastaya ise DL yapıldı. DL yapılan hastaların dokuzuna (%34,6) laparotomi gereksi- nimi oldu. DL yapılan hastaların hastanede kalış süresi ve ameliyat süresi TL yapılan hastalara göre daha kısa idi (DL 1,82±0,63, TL 5,4±2,1 gün, p<0,05), (DL 17,9±6,38, TL 68,4±33,2 dk., p<0,05). SONUÇ Hemodinamisi stabil olan PKT’li hastalarda DL kullanımı- nın negative laparotomi oranlarını, morbiditeyi ve hastane- de kalış süresini azalttığı saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATEKE, F., ÖZDOĞAN, M., ÖZYAZICI, S., DAŞ, K., MENEKŞE, E., GÜLNERMAN, Y. C., BALİ, İ., ÖNEL, S., GÖKLER, C. (2013). Penetran karın travmalarının tanısal lapararoskopi ile yönetimi: Prospektif randomize olmayan çalışma. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 53–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/324726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Selman U, Katrin D. Laparoscopy in abdominal trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2010;36:19-24
  2. Leppaniemi A, Salo J, Haapiainen R. Complications of negative laparotomy for truncal stab wounds. J Trauma 1995;38:54-8
  3. Shih HC, Wen YS, Ko TJ, Wu JK, Su CH, Lee Ch. Non- invasive evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: Prospective study using diagnostic algorithms to minimize nontherapeu- tic laparotomy. World J Surg 1999;23:265-70
  4. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stewart RM, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Kudsk KA. A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma. Ann Surg 1993;217:557-65
  5. Zantut LF, Ivatury RR, Smith RS, Kawahara NT, Porter JM, Fry WR et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for penetrating abdominal trauma: a multicenter experience. J Trauma 1997;42:825-31
  6. Taner AS, Topgul K, Kucukel F, Demir A, Sari S. Diagnostic laparoscopy decreases the rate of unnecessary laparotomies and reduces hospital costs in trauma patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001;11:207-11
  7. Villavicencio RT, Aucar JA. Analysis of laparoscopy in trau- ma. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:11-20
  8. Ertekin C, Onaran Y, Güloğlu R, Günay K, Taviloğlu K. The use of laparoscopy as a primary diagnostic and therapeutic method in penetrating wounds of lower thoracal region. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:26-9
  9. DeMaria EJ, Dalton JM, Gore DC, Kellum JM, Sugerman HJ. Complimentary role of laparoscopic abdominal explora- tion and diagnostic peritoneal lavage for evaluating abdomi- nal stab wounds: a prospective study. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Techniques 2000;10:131-6
  10. Hori Y; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Diagnostic laparos- copy guidelines: This guideline was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee and reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointes- tinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), November 2007. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1353-83.