SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Esophageal button battery ingestion in children

Arzu ŞENCAN
İncinur GENİŞOL
MÜNEVVER HOŞGÖR
Pages
306–310
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It should be suspected in the differential diagnosis of patients with persistent respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Button battery lodged in the esophagus carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to present cases of patients with esophageal button battery ingestion treated at our clinic and to emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.METHODS: Records of patients admitted to our hospital for foreign body ingestion between January 2010 and May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It should be suspected in the differential diagnosis of patients with persistent respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Button battery lodged in the esophagus carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present cases of patients with esophageal button battery ingestion treated at our clinic and to emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.METHODS: Records of patients admitted to our hospital for foreign body ingestion between January 2010 and May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases with button battery lodged in the esophagus were included in the study. Patient data regarding age, sex, length of time after ingestion until admission, presenting clinical symptoms, type and localization of the battery, management, and prognosis were analyzed.RESULTS: Among 1891 foreign body ingestions, 71 were localized in the esophagus, and 8 of those (11.2%) were cases of button battery ingestion. Mean age was 1.7 years. Admission was within 6 hours of ingestion in 5 cases, after 24 hours had elapsed in 2, and 1 month after ingestion in 1 case. All patients but 1 knew the history of ingestion. Prompt endoscopic removal was performed for all patients. Three patients developed esophageal stricture, which responded to dilatation.CONCLUSION: Early recognition and timely endoscopic removal is mandatory in esophageal button battery ingestion. It should be suspected in the differential diagnosis of patients with persistent respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENCAN, A., GENİŞOL, İ., HOŞGÖR, M. (2017). Esophageal button battery ingestion in children. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 306–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/324705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Arana A, Hauser B, Hachimi-Idrissi S, Vandenplas Y. Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:468–72
  2. Samad L, Ali Mi Rami H. Button battery ingestion: Hazards of esophageal impaction. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1527–31
  3. Millar AJ, Rode H, Cywes S, Van Der Walt F. Button-battery ingestion-a hazard of modern living. S Afr Med J 1985;68:868–71
  4. Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L, White NC, Marsolek M. Emerging battery-ingestion hazard: clinical implications. Pediatrics 2010;125:1168– 77
  5. Thompson N, Lowe-Ponsford F, Mant TG, Volans GN. Button battery ingestion: a review. Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev 1990;9:157–80
  6. Kramer RE, Lerner DG, Lin T, Manfredi M, Shah M, Stephen TC, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in children: a clinical report of the NASPGHAN Endoscopy Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015;60:562–74
  7. Cheng HT, Cheng CL, Lin CH, Tang JH, Chu YY, Liu NJ, et al. Caustic ingestion in adults: the role of endoscopic classification in predicting outcome. BMC Gastroenterol 2008;8:31
  8. McNeill MB, Sperry SL, Crockett SD, Miller CB, Shaheen NJ, Dellon ES. Epidemiology and management of oesophageal coin impaction in children. Dig Liver Dis 2012;44:482–6
  9. Litovitz T, Schmitz BF. Ingestion of cylindrical and button batteries: an analysis of 2382 cases. Pediatrics 1992;89:747–57
  10. Cheng W, Tam PK. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1472–6
  11. Litovitz TL. Battery ingestions: product accessibility and clinical course. Pediatrics 1985;75:469–76
  12. Mofenson HC, Greensher J, Caraccio TR, Danoff R. Ingestion of small flat disc batteries. Ann Emerg Med 1983;12:88–90
  13. Sharpe SJ, Rochette LM, Smith GA. Pediatric battery-related emergency department visits in the United States, 1990-2009. Pediatrics 2012;129:1111–7
  14. Sigalet D, Lees G. Tracheoesophageal injury secondary to disc battery ingestion. J Pediatr Surg 1988;23:996–8
  15. Rumack BH, Rumack CM. Disk battery ingestion. JAMA 1983;249:2509–11
  16. Temple DM, McNeese MC. Hazards of battery ingestion. Pediatrics 1983;71:100–3
  17. Bass DH, Millar AJ. Mercury absorption following button battery ingestion. J Pediatr Surg 1992;27:1541–2
  18. Kuhns DW, Dire DJ. Button battery ingestions. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:293–300
  19. Maves MD, Carithers JS, Birck HG. Esophageal burns secondary to disc battery ingestion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93:364–9. 20