Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

Our childhood cases with intussusception and pneumatic reduction

Çocukluk çağı invajinasyon olgularımız ve pnömatik redüksiyon

Pages
363–366
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results suggest that pneumatic reduction of intussusception in the pediatric population should be considered as a first choice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND Intussusception is defined as telescopic insertion of the terminal ileum in to the colon after the cecum and colon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS In our study, 118 intussusception cases treated between 1996 and 2008 were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results suggest that pneumatic reduction of intussusception in the pediatric population should be considered as a first choice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intussusception is defined as telescopic insertion of the terminal ileum in to the colon after the cecum and colon. The aim of this study was to present our experience in pneumatic reduction of intussusception. METHODS In our study, 118 intussusception cases treated between 1996 and 2008 were analyzed. Age, gender, admission time, diagnostic/treatment methods, types of intussusception including leading point, and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS Of these patients, 76 (64%) were male and 42 (36%) were female. Mean age was 25±34 months (3-180 months). The most common clinical presentations were vomiting, abdominal pain/irritable crying and bloody stools. Intussusceptions were ileocolic in 109 (92.3%) patients, ileoileal in 7 (6%) patients, and colocolic in 2 (1.7%) patients. No mortality was noted. Fifty-three patients (45%) were treated by non-operative reduction whereas the remainder were treated surgically. Among 65 patients operated, 13 leading points were detected. Pneumatic reduction success rate was 86%. Age significantly reduced the pneumatic reduction success rate; however, the duration between the beginning of symptoms and hospital admission and bloody stool were not effective. CONCLUSION Intussusception can be treated by non-operative methods when diagnosed early. Our results suggest that pneumatic reduction of intussusception in the pediatric population should be considered as a first choice.

Özet

AMAÇ İnvajinasyon, proksimal bağırsak segmentinin distal segment içine teleskopik olarak girmesidir. Çalışmanın amacı, invajinasyon olgularımızdan hareketle pnömatik redüksiyon deneyimlerimizi paylaşmaktır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Çocuk cerrahisi kliniğinde 1996-2008 tarihleri arasında invajinasyon tanısıyla tedavi edilen 118 hastanın dosyaları, yaş, cinsiyet, başvuru ayı, bulgular, tanı/tedavi yöntemleri, invajinasyon tipi ve sürükleyici noktalar açısından yeniden incelenerek, bulgular tartışıldı. BULGULAR Hastaların 76?sı (%64) erkek, 42?si (%36) kadın, yaş ortalamaları 25±34 ay (dağılım, 3-180 ay) idi. Başvuruda en sık yakınmalar; karın ağrısı, huzursuzluk, kusma ve kanlı gaitaydı. İnvajinasyonların 109?u ileokolik (%92,3), 7?si (%6) ileoileal, 2?si ise (%1,7) kolokolikti. Elli üç olgu (%45) cerrahi dışı, geriye kalan olgular cerrahi yöntemle tedavi edildi. Hastaların hiçbirisinde mortalite görülmedi. Ameliyat edilen 65 hastadan 13?ünde sürükleyici nokta saptandı. Pnömatik redüksiyonun başarı oranı %86 idi. Semptomların başlama süresi ve kanlı gaita pnömatik redüksiyonun başarısını etkilemezken, yaşla başarı oranı düşmüştür. SONUÇ İnvajinasyona erken tanı konulması durumunda, cerrahi dışı yöntemlerle rahatlıkla tedavi edilebilen bir patolojidir. Çocuk yaş grubunda perforasyon ve peritonit bulguları olmayan tüm olgularda pnömatik redüksiyonun ilk seçenek olarak denenebileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANKORKMAZ, L., KÖYLÜOĞLU, G., ARSLAN, M. Ş., GÜNEY, C. (2010). Our childhood cases with intussusception and pneumatic reduction. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 363–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/324566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Hamby LG, Fowler CL, Pokony WJ. Intussusception. In: Donellan WL, editor. Abdominal surgery of infancy and childhood. 2nd edition. Luxembourg: Harwood academic publishers; 2001. p. 42/1-42/19
  2. Beasly SW, Hutson JM, Auldist AW. Essential paediatric surgery. 1st ed., London: Arnold; 1996. p. 45-51
  3. Tangi VT, Bear JW, Reid IS, Wright JE. Intussusception in Newcastle in a 25 year period. Aust N Z J Surg 1991;61:608-13
  4. Page AC, Price JF, Salisbury JR, Howard ER, Karani J. Chronic intussusception. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:134-5
  5. Kilic N, Kiristioglu I, Kirkpinar A, Dogruyol H. A very rare cause of intestinal atresia: intrauterine intussusception due to Meckel’s diverticulum. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:756-7
  6. Aschcraft K. Intussusception. In: Aschcraft K, Holter T, editors. Pediatric surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1993. p. 416-9
  7. Yang CM, Hsu HY, Tsao PN, Chang MH, Lin FY. Recurrence of intussusception in childhood. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2001;42:158-61
  8. Kırıştıoğlu I. İnvajinasyonlarda tedavi yaklaşımı. Güncel Pediatri 2004;2:131-3
  9. Crankson SJ, Al-Rabeeah AA, Fischer JD, Al-Jadaan SA, Namshan MA. Idiopathic intussusception in infancy and childhood. Saudi Med J 2003;24:18-20
  10. Hutchison IF, Olayiwola B, Young DG. Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Br J Surg 1980;67:209-12
  11. Mulcahy DL, Kamath KR, de Silva LM, Hodges S, Carter IW, Cloonan MJ. A two-part study of the aetiological role of rotavirus in intussusception. J Med Virol 1982;9:51-5
  12. Ong NT, Beasley SW. The leadpoint in intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:640-3
  13. Başaklar AC. Bebek ve çocukların cerrahi ve ürolojik hastalıkları. 1. baskı. Ankara: Palme; 2006
  14. Zorludemir Ü, Yücesan S ve Olcay I. İnvajinasyon: 168 hastanın klinik değerlendirmesi. Pediatrik Cerrahi Dergisi 1987;2:81-9
  15. Byrne AT, Geoghegan T, Govender P, Lyburn ID, Colhoun E, Torreggiani WC. The imaging of intussusception. Clin Radiol 2005;60:39-46
  16. Munden MM, Bruzzi JF, Coley BD, Munden RF. Sonography of pediatric small-bowel intussusception: differentiating surgical from nonsurgical cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:275-9
  17. Tiao MM, Wan YL, Ng SH, Ko SF, Lee TY, Chen MC, et al. Sonographic features of small-bowel intussusception in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:368-73
  18. Meyer JS, Dangman BC, Buonomo C, Berlin JA. Air and liquid contrast agents in the management of intussusception: a controlled, randomized trial. Radiology 1993;188:507-11
  19. Ikeda T, Koshin