SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Prehospital life support in trauma patients: basic or advanced trauma life support

Travma olgularında hastane öncesi yaşam desteği seçimi: Temel ya da ileri travma yaşam desteği

Mehmet ÖZDOĞAN
Fatih AĞALAR
Mehmet ERYILMAZ
Gürkan ÖZEL
Korhan TAVİLOĞLU
Pages
87–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prospective randomized trials comparing ATLS and BLS in prehospital management of trauma patients are needed to clarify this issue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The controversy between Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) in the prehospital care of trauma patients has not been resolved yet.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 76 papers on ATLS and/or BLS for trauma were reviewed regarding the variables such as intravenous catheter application, prehospital fluid resuscitation, transport time, intubation and mortality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prospective randomized trials comparing ATLS and BLS in prehospital management of trauma patients are needed to clarify this issue.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaşam desteği sistemleri · Hasta taşıma · Canlandırma

Abstract

The controversy between Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) in the prehospital care of trauma patients has not been resolved yet. The purpose of this study was to examine the literature with respect to the type of prehospital care applied to the trauma patients. A total of 76 papers on ATLS and/or BLS for trauma were reviewed regarding the variables such as intravenous catheter application, prehospital fluid resuscitation, transport time, intubation and mortality. As a conclusion, the data in the literature do not support the routine use of on-field ATLS in trauma patients. Prospective randomized trials comparing ATLS and BLS in prehospital management of trauma patients are needed to clarify this issue.

Özet

Travmalı olgularda hastane öncesi dönemde uygulanması gereken tedavinin “İleri Travma Yaşam Desteği” (İTYD) ya da “Temel Yaşam Desteği” (TYD) şeklinde olması gerektiği üzerindeki tartışmalar sürmektedir. Bu derlemede travma hastalarına hastane öncesi dönemde uygulanan İTYD ve TYD tedavileri üzerine olan literatür gözden geçirildi; İTYD ve TYD içeren toplam 76 çalışma değerlendirildi. İntravenöz katater uygulaması, hastane öncesi sıvı tedavisi, hasta transport süresi, entübasyon ve ölüm oranları gibi değişkenler incelendi. Literatürdeki bilgilerin sahada travma hastalarına rutin olarak İTYD uygulanmasının gerekliliği konusunda net olmadığı sonucuna varıldı. Bu konudaki eksikliğin giderilmesi için travma hastalarında İTYD ve TYD’yi karşılaştıran prospektif, kontollü çalışmalara gereksinim vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDOĞAN, M., AĞALAR, F., ERYILMAZ, M., ÖZEL, G., TAVİLOĞLU, K. (2006). Prehospital life support in trauma patients: basic or advanced trauma life support. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 87–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/324459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bresnahan KA, Fowler J. Emergency medical care in Turkey: current status and future directions. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:357-60
  2. Lechleuthner A, Emerman C, Dauber A, Bouillon B, Kubincanek JA. Evolution of rescue systems: a comparison between Cologne and Cleveland. Prehospital Disaster Med 1994;9:193-7
  3. VanRooyen MJ, Thomas TL, Clem KJ. International emergency medical services: assessment of developing prehospital systems abroad. J Emerg Med 1999;17:691-6
  4. Frame SB. Prehospital care. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, editors. Trauma. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 103-26
  5. Arnold JL. International emergency medicine and the recent development of emergency medicine worldwide. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:97-103
  6. Taviloğlu K. TRK hakkında genel bilgiler. In: Ertekin C, Günay MK, Kurtoğlu M, Taviloğlu K, editörler. Travma ve Resüsitasyon Kurs Kitabı. ‹İtanbul: Logos Yayıncılık; 1998. s. 7-14
  7. Taviloglu K, Ertekin C, Guloglu R, Tokyay R, Akgun Y. Trauma and resuscitation course (TRC): evaluation of the first 2 years. [Article in Turkish] Ulus Travma Derg 2001;7:8-12. 8. van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJ. Clinical impact of advanced trauma life support. Am J Emerg Med 2004;22:522-5
  8. Driscoll P, Wardrope J. ATLS: past, present, and future. Emerg Med J 2005;22:2-3. 10. van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJ. Advanced trauma life support study: quality of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. J Trauma 2004;57:381-4
  9. Trunkey D. Initial treatment of patients with extensive trauma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1259-63
  10. Eisenberg MS, Bergner L, Hallstrom A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: improved survival with paramedic services. Lancet 1980;1:812-5
  11. Bissell RA, Eslinger DG, Zimmerman L. The efficacy of advanced life support: a review of the literature. Prehospital Disaster Med 1998;13:77-87
  12. Liberman M, Mulder D, Sampalis J. Prehospital care of the patient with major trauma. J Trauma 2000;49:584-99
  13. Bunn F, Kwan I, Roberts I, Wentz R. Effectiveness of pre-hospital trauma care. Cochrane Injuries Group. 2001. Available from: http://www.cochrane-injuries.1shtm. ac.uk 16. Fowler R, Pepe PE. Prehospital care of the patient with major trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2002;20:953-74
  14. Kowalenko T, Stern S, Dronen S, Wang X. Improved outcome with hypotensive resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in a swine model. J Trauma 1992;33:349-53
  15. Krausz MM, Bar-Ziv M, Rabinovici R, Gross