Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Ağır sekonder peritonitli hastalarda laparostomi

Laparostomy in patients with severe secondary peritonitis

Pages
52–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Temporary abdominal closure using the Bogota bag in patients with secondary peritonitis is an inexpensive-simple method, permitting evaluation of underlying viscera and recognition of infection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparostomy with the Bogota bag for the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis and the risk factors for survival.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (22 males, 15 females; mean age 63.5; range 44 to 83 years) with secondary peritonitis were treated by laparostomy and temporary closure with Bogota bag.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Temporary abdominal closure using the Bogota bag in patients with secondary peritonitis is an inexpensive-simple method, permitting evaluation of underlying viscera and recognition of infection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Duyarlılık ve özgüllük · Laparotomi · Sağkalım oranı

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laparostomy with the Bogota bag for the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis and the risk factors for survival. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (22 males, 15 females; mean age 63.5; range 44 to 83 years) with secondary peritonitis were treated by laparostomy and temporary closure with Bogota bag. APACHE II scores and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) were used to calculate the disease severity. The outcomes and effectiveness of APACHE II and MPI values were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 43.2%. Significant differences were noted between survivors and non-survivors according to initial APACHE II and MPI scores and the number of operations. The non-survivors had higher APACHE II (r=0.81, p=0.001) and MPI (r=0.39, p=0.02) scores. The patients who survived were re-operated 1.6 times and those who died were re-operated 4.7 times. In five patients, laparostomy was closed primarily, while in the others, the wound was left open to heal secondarily. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher APACHE II and MPI scores and number of operations had higher rates of mortality due to their major risk factors. Temporary abdominal closure using the Bogota bag in patients with secondary peritonitis is an inexpensive-simple method, permitting evaluation of underlying viscera and recognition of infection.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada, sekonder peritonitli hastaların tedavisinde, Bogota bag ile geçici karın kapatmanın etkinliği ve sağ kalımdaki risk faktörleri değerlendirildi. GEREÇ-YÖNTEM: Sekonder peritonit nedeniyle Bogota bag kullanılarak geçici olarak karın kapatılması uygulanan 37 hasta (22 erkek, 15 kadın; ort. yaş 63,5; dağılım 44-83) ele alındı. Hastalığın şiddetinin belirlenmesinde Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) ve Mannheim Peritonit İndeksi (MPI) skorları kullanıldı. APACHE II’nin sonuçları ve etkililiği ve MPI değerleri, geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Mortalite oranı %43,2 olarak belirlendi. Yaşayan ve hayatını kaybeden hastaların, başvuru APACHE II (r=0,81, p=0,001) ve MPI (r=0,39, p=0,02) skorları ve ameliyat sayıları (1,6’ya karşın 4,7 ameliyat) arasında yaşayanların lehine anlamlı fark saptandı. Beş hastada laparostomi primer olarak kapatılırken, yaşayan diğer hastalar sekonder iyileşmeye bırakıldı. SONUÇ: Sekonder peritonitli hastalarda Bogota bag ile geçici karın kapatılması, ucuz ve basit bir yöntem olup, şeffaflığıyla altındaki organların ve enfeksiyonun gözlenmesine olanak sağlar. Yüksek APACHE II ve MPI skorları ve fazla sayıda relaparotomi uygulanması, daha yüksek mortalite oranı ile sonuçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLLÜ, D., KÖKSOY, F. N., DEMİRAY, O., GÜRDAL, S. Ö., YÜCEL, T., YÜCEL, O. (2009). Ağır sekonder peritonitli hastalarda laparostomi. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 52–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/324386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Dittrich K, Beckerhinn P, Schwarzmaier A, Redl E. Long-term outcome after open treatment of severe intra-abdominal infection and pancreatic necrosis. Arch Surg 1998;133:140-4
  2. Wittmann DH, Schein M, Condon RE. Management of secondary peritonitis. Ann Surg 1996;224:10-8
  3. Kaplan M, Banwell P, Orgill DP, Ivatury RR, Demetriades D, Moore FA, et al. Guidelines for the management of the open abdomen. Wounds 2005(17 Suppl):1-24
  4. Rakic M, Popovic D, Rakic M, Druzijanic N, Lojpur M, Hall BA, et al. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Croat Med J 2005;46:957-63
  5. Rutherford EJ, Skeete DA, Brasel KJ. Management of the patient with an open abdomen: techniques in temporary and definitive closure. Curr Probl Surg 2004;41:815-76
  6. Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Visser MR, van Vroonhoven TJ, van der Werken C. Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg 2000;166:44-9
  7. Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Mizrahi S. Use of the "Bogota bag" for temporary abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis. Am Surg 2007;73:249-52
  8. Lenz S, Doll D, Harder K, Lieber A, Müller U, Düsel W, et al. Procedures of temporary wall closure in abdominal trauma and sepsis. [Article in German] Chirurg 2006;77:580-5. [Abstract] 9. Schein M. Surgical management of intra-abdominal infection: is there any evidence? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2002;387:1-7. 10.Taviloglu K. Staged abdominal re-operation for abdominal trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2003;9:149-53. 11.Guloglu R. Abdominal compartment syndrome. Ulus Travma Derg 2002;8:133-6
  9. Jiffry BA, Sebastian MW, Amin T, Isbister WH. Multiple laparotomies for severe intra-abdominal infection. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68:139-42. 13.Robledo FA, Luque-de-León E, Suárez R, Sánchez P, de-la- Fuente M, Vargas A, et al. Open versus closed management of the abdomen in the surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2007;8:63-72. 14. van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR, Reuland EA, Gooszen HG, Opmeer BC, et al. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2007;298:865-72. 15.Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Reitsma JB, Mahler CW, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 2002;89:1516-24. 16.Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Belt EJ,