Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5

Temporal kemik kırıkları: 77 hastanın değerlendirilmesi ve bir yaklaşım algoritması

Temporal bone fractures: evaluation of 77 patients and a management algorithm

Pages
424–428
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We formed a management algorithm for the systematic evaluation and treatment of temporal fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the etiologies, otolaryngological features, radiological findings, management strategies, and outcomes of temporal bone fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS Nearly 55% of the cases were caused by traffic accidents and were predominantly male (76.6%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We formed a management algorithm for the systematic evaluation and treatment of temporal fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the etiologies, otolaryngological features, radiological findings, management strategies, and outcomes of temporal bone fractures. METHODS Seventy-seven temporal bone fracture cases were retrospectively evaluated for age and gender distribution, side of the fracture, etiology of injuries, the presence of blood otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea, hearing loss, hemotympanum, and facial or other cranial nerve palsies, and computerized tomography reports. RESULTS Nearly 55% of the cases were caused by traffic accidents and were predominantly male (76.6%). Otolaryngological presentations in order to frequency were early conductive hearing loss (65.8%), blood otorrhea (61.2%), hemotympanum (58.5%), tympanic membrane perforation (25.6%), facial nerve paralysis (12.3%), cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea (8.5%), and sensorineural hearing loss (5.4%). Most of the fractures were petrous (65.8%) and longitudinal type (51.2%). CONCLUSION In this research, otolaryngological findings in order of frequency and treatment approaches were compared with literature findings and discussed in 77 temporal bone fracture cases. We formed a management algorithm for the systematic evaluation and treatment of temporal fractures.

Özet

AMAÇ Temporal kemik kırığı olan hastalarda etyoloji, otolaringolojik semptom ve bulguların radyolojik değerlendirmeleri, tedavi yaklaşımları ve sonuçlar değerlendirildi. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Yetmiş yedi temporal kemik kırığı olgusu, yaş, cinsiyet, kırığın yeri, kırığın etyolojisi ve kanlı otore, timpanik membran perforasyonu, serebrospinal otore, işitme kaybı, hemotimpanum, fasiyal ve diğer kraniyal sinir paralizilerinin varlığı ve bilgisayarlı tomografi sonuçları yönünden geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. BULGULAR Olgularda kırıkların %55’i trafik kazası sonucu meydana gelmişti ve çoğunluğu erkekti (%76,6). Otolaringolojik bulgular sıklık sırası ile erken dönem iletim tipi işitme kaybı (%65,8), kanlı otore (%61,2), hemotimpanum (%58,5), timpanik membran perforasyonu (%25,6), fasiyal sinir paralizisi (%12,3), serebrospinal otore (%8,5) ve sensörinöral işitme kaybı (%5,4) idi. Kırıkların çoğu petroz (%65,8) ve uzunlamasına tip (%51,2) idi. SONUÇ Bu araştırmada 77 temporal kemik kırığı hastasında sıklık sırası ile otolaringolojik bulguları ve tedavi yaklaşımımızı literatür bulguları ile karşılaştırıp tartıştık. Temporal kırıklarda sistematik bir değerlendirme ve tedavi için bir algoritma oluşturduk.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINER, G., KUTLUHAN, A., BOZDEMİR, K., ÇETİN, H., TARLAK, B., BİLGEN, A. S. (2012). Temporal kemik kırıkları: 77 hastanın değerlendirilmesi ve bir yaklaşım algoritması. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5, 424–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/324151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Işık HS, Bostancı U, Yıldız O, Ozdemir C, Gökyar A. Ret- rospective analysis of 954 adult patients with head injury: an epidemiological study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011;17:46-50
  2. Gladwell M, Viozzi C. Temporal bone fractures: a review for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:513-22
  3. Johnson F, Semaan MT, Megerian CA. Temporal bone frac- ture: evaluation and management in the modern era. Otolar- yngol Clin North Am 2008;41:597-618
  4. Yoganandan N, Baisden JL, Maiman DJ, Gennarelli TA, Guan Y, Pintar FA, et al. Severe-to-fatal head injuries in mo- tor vehicle impacts. Accid Anal Prev 2010;42:1370-8
  5. Ahmed KA, Alison D, Whatley WS, Chandra RK. The role of angiography in managing patients with temporal bone fractures: a retrospective study of 64 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2009;88:922-5
  6. Ishman SL, Friedland DR. Temporal bone fractures: tradi- tional classification and clinical relevance. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1734-41
  7. Amin Z, Sayuti R, Kahairi A, Islah W, Ahmad R. Head injury with temporal bone fracture: one year review of case inci- dence, causes, clinical features and outcome. Med J Malaysia 2008;63:373-6
  8. Burgut HR, Bener A, Sidahmed H, Albuz R, Sanya R, Khan WA. Risk factors contributing to road traffic crashes in a fast-developing country: the neglected health problem. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010;16(6):497-502
  9. Hiroual M, Zougarhi A, El Ganouni NC, Essadki O, Ousehal A, Tijani Adil O, et al. High-resolution CT of temporal bone trauma: review of 38 cases. J Radiol 2010;91:53-8
  10. Saraiya PV, Aygun N. Temporal bone fractures. Emerg Ra- diol 2009;16:255-65
  11. Yetiser S, Hidir Y, Gonul E. Facial nerve problems and hear- ing loss in patients with temporal bone fractures: demograph- ic data. J Trauma 2008;65:1314-20
  12. Kim J, Moon IS, Shim DB, Lee WS. The effect of surgical timing on functional outcomes of traumatic facial nerve pa- ralysis. J Trauma 2010;68:924-9
  13. Nash JJ, Friedland DR, Boorsma KJ, Rhee JS. Management and outcomes of facial paralysis from intratemporal blunt trauma: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1397- 404.