Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Spinal yaralanma epidemiyolojisinde yerel farklılıklar

Local differences in the epidemiology of traumatic spinal injuries

Pages
49–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cervical injury ratio of population has decreased due to decrease in number of automobile accident related TSCI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Spinal cord injury has a lifetime serious impact.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Data included TSCI patients admitted to ED of Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital between January 2007 and December 2011. 409 TSCI patients were included to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cervical injury ratio of population has decreased due to decrease in number of automobile accident related TSCI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Spinal cord injury has a lifetime serious impact. It has obvious social and economic effects for patients and society. The aim of this study was to collect recent information and analyze changes in the epidemiology of traumatic spinal injuries. Patients and Methods: Data included TSCI patients admitted to ED of Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital between January 2007 and December 2011. 409 TSCI patients were included to the study. Categorical variables were analyzed with Fischer’s Exact Test and parametric variables were analyzed with Independent Samples T Test. Results: Most common injury mechanism was fall from heights. 85(%20.8) patients were injured in low falls. Second most common injury mechanism was low falls. Most common injury was lumbar spine injury. 196(%48) patients suffered isolated lumbar spine injury. Thoracal spine injuries were the second most common injuries. Lumbar spinal injuries (p=0.00011) were higher in high falls. Low fall was a significant mechanism for thoracal spine injuries (p=0.003). Automobile accidents had a significant relation with cervical (p=0.00001) and lumbar spinal injuries(p=0.004). Conclusion: Although cervical injuries were higher in automobile accidents, ratio of automobile accident related TSCI was less than other studies. Cervical injury ratio of population has decreased due to decrease in number of automobile accident related TSCI.

Özet

Giriş: Spinal kord yaralanması ömür boyu süren etkiye sahiptir. Hastalar ve toplum için ağır sosyal ve ekonomik etkileri vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı şehir yaşamının TSCI üzerinde yarattığı epidemiyolojik farklılıkları tanımlamaktır. Materyal Metot: Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi acil servisine Ocak 2007-Aralık 2011 arasında başvuran 409 TSCI hastası değerlendirildi. Kategorik değişkenler için Fischer Exact testi; parametrik veriler için Independent Samples T testi kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: En sık yaralanma şekli yüksekten düşmelerdi. 85(%20.8)hasta basit düşme sonucu yaralanmıştı. En sık ikinci yaralanma şekli basit düşmelerdi. 196(%48) hasta lomber spinal yaralanma geçirmişti. En sık lomber spinal yaralanmalar gözlenmişti. Torakal bölge en sık ikinci yaralanan bölgeydi. Lomber spinal yaralanmalar yüksekten düşmelerde daha sıktı (p=0.00011). Basit düşmelerde torakal bölge yaralanmaları daha sıktı (p=0.003). Otomobil kazalarında belirgin şekilde servikal (p=0.00001) ve lomber (p=0.004) yaralanmalar daha sıktı. Karar: Servikal yaralanmalar otomobil kazalarında daha sık olmaktadır. Şehir merkezinde otomobil kazasına bağlı TSCI oranı diğer çalışmalara göre daha azdı. Servikal yaralanma oranıda otomobil kazası ilişkili TSCI oranının azalması ile azalmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, M. Ö., ANLAŞ, S. D., KOŞARGELİR, M., ÇOLAK, Ş., ÖZTÜRK, E. (2013). Spinal yaralanma epidemiyolojisinde yerel farklılıklar. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 49–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/324139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Knútsdóttir S, Thórisdóttir H, Sigvaldason K, Jónsson H Jr, Björnsson A, Ingvarsson P. Epidemiology of traumatic spi- nal cord injuries in Iceland from 1975 to 2009. Spinal Cord 2012;50:123-6
  2. Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspec- tive on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1355-70
  3. Schoenfeld AJ, Sielski B, Rivera KP, Bader JO, Harris MB. Epidemiology of cervical spine fractures in the US military. Spine J 2012;12:777-83
  4. Karacan I, Koyuncu H, Pekel O, Sümbüloglu G, Kirnap M, Dursun H, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Tur- key: a nation-wide epidemiological study. Spinal Cord 2000;38:697-701
  5. Lenehan B, Street J, Kwon BK, Noonan V, Zhang H, Fisher CG, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord in- jury in British Columbia, Canada. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:321-9
  6. Draulans N, Kiekens C, Roels E, Peers K. Etiology of spinal cord injuries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Spinal Cord 2011;49:1148-54
  7. Couris CM, Guilcher SJ, Munce SE, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, et al. Characteristics of adults with incident trau- matic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. Spinal Cord 2010;48:39-44
  8. Tuğcu I, Tok F, Yılmaz B, Göktepe AS, Alaca R, Yazıcıoğlu K, et al. Epidemiologic data of the patients with spinal cord injury: seven years’ experience of a single center. Ulus Trav- ma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011;17:533-8.