Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrışması, olgu serisi ve literatüre genel bakış

Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty: case series and literature review

Pages
181–188
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients without major complications such as posterior segment damage, visual outcomes and graft survival can be favorable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors, clinical features and outcomes of surgery for traumatic wound dehiscence (TWD) following penetrating keratoplasty (PK).METHODS: Twenty-six patients with TWD following PK were evaluated retrospectively in terms of factors related to the trauma, types of reconstructive surgery, final graft clarity, and visual acuity.RESULTS: There were 26 patients with a mean age of 40.7±19.6 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 12 (46.1%) patients, the better eye was affected by the trauma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients without major complications such as posterior segment damage, visual outcomes and graft survival can be favorable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors, clinical features and outcomes of surgery for traumatic wound dehiscence (TWD) following penetrating keratoplasty (PK).METHODS: Twenty-six patients with TWD following PK were evaluated retrospectively in terms of factors related to the trauma, types of reconstructive surgery, final graft clarity, and visual acuity.RESULTS: There were 26 patients with a mean age of 40.7±19.6 years. In 12 (46.1%) patients, the better eye was affected by the trauma. The most frequent type of trauma was blunt trauma by various objects (9). In all cases, the dehiscence was at the graft host junction. The mean extent of detachment was 135.4°±57.6°. Crystalline or intraocular lens damage was present in 42.3% of cases. Median follow-up time after the reconstructive surgery was 36 months. The graft remained clear in 13 (50%) patients, whereas graft insufficiency/graft rejection developed in 13 (50%) patients. Final visual acuity was over 20/200 in 13 (50%) patients.CONCLUSION: TWD may occur at any time after PK, most frequently within the first postoperative year. Low visual acuity in the other eye seems to be a major risk factor. In patients without major complications such as posterior segment damage, visual outcomes and graft survival can be favorable.

Özet

AMAÇ: Penetran keratoplasti (PK) sonrası travmatik yara ayrışması için risk faktörleri, klinik özellikler ve cerrahi sonuçları değerlendirmek.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrışması gelişen 26 hasta travma ile ilişki faktörler, rekonstriktif cerrahi işlemler ile sonuç greft sağkalımı ve görme keskinliği açısından geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi.BULGULAR: Yaş ortalaması 40.7±19.6 yaş olan 26 hastanın 12'sinde (%46.1) travmadan daha iyi gören göz etkilenmişti. En sık travma tipinin dokuz olguda (%34.6) olmak üzere çeşitli objelerle gelişen künt travma olduğu görüldü. Ayrışma bütün olgularda greft ile alıcı bileşkesinde gelişmişti. Ay-rışma genişliği ortalama 135.4°±57.6° idi. Kristalin lens veya göz içi lens hasar oranı %42.3 olarak bulundu. Cerrahi sonrası medyan takip süresi 36 aydı. On üç (%50) hastada greft saydam kalırken, 13 hastada (%50) greft yetmezliği/greft reddi gelişmişti. Sonuç görme keskinliği 20/200 üzerinde olan hasta sayısı 13 (%50) idi.TARTIŞMA: Travmatik yara ayrışması PK sonrası en sık birinci yılda olmak üzere herhangi bir zamanda gelişebilir. Diğer gözde görme azlığı önemli bir risk faktörü olarak gözükmektedir. Arka segmenti hasarı gibi önemli komplikasyonu olmayan hastalarda görsel sonuçlar ve greft sağkalımı olumludur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, B., KANDEMİR, B., SET, T., KUĞU, S., KELEŞ, S., CEYLAN, E., AKMAZ, B., APİL, A., ÖZERTÜRK, Y. (2014). Penetran keratoplasti sonrası travmatik yara ayrışması, olgu serisi ve literatüre genel bakış. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 181–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/324087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nordberg E. Injuries as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology and prospects for control. East Afr Med J 2000;77(12 Sup- pl):1-43. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:143-69.
  2. Rohrbach JM, Weidle EG, Steuhl KP, Meilinger S, Pleyer U. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:501-5.
  3. Elder MJ, Stack RR. Globe rupture following penetrating keratoplasty: how often, why, and what can we do to prevent it? Cornea 2004;23:776- 80. Ball JL, McLeod BK. Traumatic wound dehiscence following cataract surgery: a thing of the past? Eye (Lond) 2001;15:42-4.
  4. Lambrou FH, Kozarsky A. Wound dehiscence following cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg 1987;18:738-40. Human organ and tissue transplantation. Report by the Secretariat. Executive Board, EB112/5, 112th session, Provisional agenda item 4.3. World Health Organization. May 2003. Available: http://apps.who.int/ gb/archive/pdf_files/EB112/eeb1125.pdf. Kang PC, Klintworth GK, Kim T, Carlson AN, Adelman R, Stinnett S, et al. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1980-2001. Cornea 2005;24:801-3.
  5. Aiken-O'Neill P, Mannis MJ. Summary of comeal transplant activity Eye Bank Association of America. Cornea 2002;21:1-3. Cherry PM. Rupture of the globe. Arch Ophthalmol 1972;88:498-507.
  6. Agrawal V, Wagh M, Krishnamachary M, Rao GN, Gupta S. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 1995;14:601-3.
  7. Jeganathan SV, Ghosh S, Jhanji V, Lamoureux E, Taylor HR, Vajpayee RB. Resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective analy- sis. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:893-5.
  8. Renucci AM, Marangon FB, Culbertson WW. Wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty: clinical characteristics of 51 cases treated at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Cornea 2006;25:524-9.
  9. Rehany U, Rumelt S. Ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, outcome, and postoperative recommendations. Arch Ophthal- mol 1998;116:1282-6.
  10. Calkins JL, Hochheimer BF, Stark WJ. Corneal wound healing: holo- graphic stress-test analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;21:322-34.
  11. Topping TM, Stark WJ, Maumenee E, Kenyon KR. Traumatic wound dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:174-8.
  12. Tseng SH, Lin SC, Chen FK. Traumatic wound dehiscence after pen- etrating keratoplasty: clinical features and outcome in 21 cases. Cornea 1999;18:553-8.
  13. Das S, Whiting M, Taylor HR. Corneal wound dehisce