Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Klinik olarak tanı konulamayan penil fraktür olgularına MR görüntülemenin katkısı

Contribution of MRI to clinically equivocal penile fracture cases

Pages
549–552
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All MRI findings were confirmed during surgery.CONCLUSION: Performing MRI in clinically equivocal cases can provide crucial data to make precise diagnosis and improve patient management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Penile fracture is a surgical emergency defined as rupture of the tunica albuginea.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although most cases can be diagnosed with clinical evaluation, it has been stated in the literature that diagnosis in as many as 15% of cases can be challenging.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All MRI findings were confirmed during surgery.CONCLUSION: Performing MRI in clinically equivocal cases can provide crucial data to make precise diagnosis and improve patient management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penile fracture is a surgical emergency defined as rupture of the tunica albuginea. Although most cases can be diagnosed with clinical evaluation, it has been stated in the literature that diagnosis in as many as 15% of cases can be challenging. In uncertain cases, imaging can help determine diagnosis.METHODS: Present study included 20 cases where diagnosis could not be made with certainty and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. MR images were examined for tunical rupture and accompanying pathologies. When rupture was observed, localization and length of rupture were noted. All patients underwent degloving surgery. All imaging findings were compared to surgical findings.RESULTS: MRI revealed 19 tunical ruptures. In 1 case, hematoma was seen with no sign of penile fracture. No urethral injuries were found. All MRI findings were confirmed during surgery.CONCLUSION: Performing MRI in clinically equivocal cases can provide crucial data to make precise diagnosis and improve patient management.

Özet

AMAÇ: Penil fraktür tunika albugineada oluşan rüptür olup acil cerrahi müdahale gerektirir. Olguların çoğunluğu klinik değerlendirme ile tanı alabilirse de literatürde belirtildiği gibi %15 gibi bir oranda sadece klinik ile tanı konulmasında zorlanılabilir. Bu durumda görüntüleme tanı konmasında yardımcı olabilir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Bizim çalışmamızda tanısı klinik olarak konulamamış 20 hastaya manyetik rezonans (MR) görüntüleme yapıldı. Manyetik rezonans görüntülerinde tunikal bütünlük kaybı ve eşlik edebilecek diğer patolojiler araştırıldı. Rüptür izlenen olgularda bu rüptürün lokalizasyonu ve uzunluğu kaydedildi. Hastaların tamamı ameliyat edildi. Görüntüleme bulguları operasyon bulguları ile karşılaştırıldı. BULGULAR: Manyetik rezonans görüntülemede 19 tunikal rüptür tanımlandı. Bir olguda sadece hematom görüntülenebilmiş olup tunikal rüptür lehine bir bulgu saptanmadı. Hiçbir olguda üretral yaralanma gözlenmedi. Görüntüleme bulgularının tamamı operasyon bulguları ile doğrulandı. TARTIŞMA: Klinik olarak tanısında zorlanılan penil fraktür olgularında MR görüntüleme tanının doğrulukla ve güvenle konmasında kritik bilgiler sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKAY, R., YENİCE, M. G., AKSOY, S., ŞEKER, G., ŞAHİN, S., İNCİ, E., TUĞCU, V., TAŞÇI, A. İ. (2016). Klinik olarak tanı konulamayan penil fraktür olgularına MR görüntülemenin katkısı. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 549–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/324022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kirkham AP, Illing RO, Minhas S, Minhas S, Allen C. MR imaging of nonmalignant penile lesions. Radiographics 2008;28(3):837-53
  2. Nomura JT, Sierzenski PR. Ultrasound diagnosis of penile fracture. J Emerg Med 2010;38:362-5
  3. Beysel M, Tekin A, Gürdal M, Yücebaş E, Sengör F. Evaluation and treatment of penile fractures: accuracy of clinical diagnosis and the value of corpus cavernosography. Urology 2002;60:492-6
  4. Feki W, Derouiche A, Belhaj K, Ouni A, Ben Mouelhi S, Ben Slama MR, et al. False penile fracture: report of 16 cases. Int J Impot Res 2007;19:471-3
  5. Gedik A, Kayan D, Yamiş S, Yılmaz Y, Bircan K. The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011;17:57-60
  6. Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Ariman A, Erton H, Basak D. Penile fracture: differential diagnosis, management and outcome. Br J Urol 1996;77:279- 81
  7. De Rose AF, Giglio M, Carmignani G. Traumatic rupture of the corpora cavernosa: new physiopathologic acquisitions. Urology 2001;57:319-22
  8. Grosman H, Gray RR, St Louis EL, Casey R, Keresteci AG, Elliott DS. The role of corpus cavernosography in acute "fracture" of the penis. Radiology 1982;144:787-8
  9. Dierks PR, Hawkins H. Sonography and penile trauma. J Ultrasound Med 1983;2:417-9
  10. Fedel M, Venz S, Andreessen R, Sudhoff F, Loening SA. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected penile fracture with atypical clinical findings. J Urol 1996;155:1924-7
  11. Uder M, Gohl D, Takahashi M, Derouet H, Defreyne L, Kramann B, et al. MRI of penile fracture: diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up. Eur Radiol 2002;12:113-20
  12. Abolyosr A, Moneim AE, Abdelatif AM, Abdalla MA, Imam HM. The management of penile fracture based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. BJU Int 2005;96:373-7
  13. Morris SB, Miller MA, Anson K. Management of penile fracture. J R Soc Med 1998;91:427-8.