Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Her intususepsiyon tedavisi acil girişim veya cerrahi midir?

Is every intussusception treatment an emergency intervention or surgery?

Pages
139–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For those longer than 4 cm, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery, spontaneous reduction is unlikely

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Intussusception is the second most common cause of acute abdomen in children, following appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the experience of the authors, in an effort to promote intussusception management, especially that of small bowel intussusception.METHODS: Records of intussusception diagnosed between July 2002 and September 2014 were evaluated in terms of patient age, sex, clinical findings, admission time, ultrasonographic findings, treatment methods, and outcomes.RESULTS: Eighty-one patients, 52 males and 29 females, were included (mean age: 10.6 months).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For those longer than 4 cm, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery, spontaneous reduction is unlikely
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is the second most common cause of acute abdomen in children, following appendicitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the experience of the authors, in an effort to promote intussusception management, especially that of small bowel intussusception.METHODS: Records of intussusception diagnosed between July 2002 and September 2014 were evaluated in terms of patient age, sex, clinical findings, admission time, ultrasonographic findings, treatment methods, and outcomes.RESULTS: Eighty-one patients, 52 males and 29 females, were included (mean age: 10.6 months). Intussusceptions were ileocolic (IC) in 52 cases, ileoileal (IL) in 26, and jejunojejunal (JJ) in 3. Nineteen (23.5%) patients underwent surgery. Hydrostatic reduction was performed in 45 (55.5%) IC cases. Seventeen (21%) patients with small bowel intussusceptions (SBIs), measuring 1.8-2.3 cm in length, spontaneously reduced. All patients who underwent surgery had intussusceptums >=4 cm. Three of the 4 intestinal resection cases had history of abdominal surgery.CONCLUSION: If peritoneal irritation is present, patients with intussusception must undergo surgery. Otherwise, in patients with IC intussusception and no sign of peritoneal irritation, hydrostatic or pneumatic reduction is indicated. When this fails, surgery is the next step. SBIs free of peritoneal irritation and shorter than 2.3 cm tend to spontaneously reduce. For those longer than 4 cm, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery, spontaneous reduction is unlikely

Özet

AMAÇ: İntususepsiyon, çocuklarda akut apandisitten sonra en yaygın akut karın sebebidir. İntususepsiyon deneyimlerimizi, ileo-kolik ve ince bağırsak intususepsiyonlarına yaklaşım seçeneklerini gözden geçirmeyi hedefledik. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Temmuz 2002-Eylül 2014 yılları arasında kliniğimizde intususepsiyon tanısı almış olguların kayıtları tarandı; yaş, cinsiyet, klinik bulgular, başvuru süresi, ultrasonografi bulguları ve uygulanan tedavi seçenekleri ve sonuçları değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Toplamda 81 olgunun 52'si erkek, 29'u kız, ortalama yaşları 10.6 aydı. İntususepsiyon 52 hastada ileokolik, 26 hastada ileoileal, üç hastada jejunojejunaldi. On dokuz (%23.5) olguda cerrahi, tümü ileokolik 45 (%55.5) olguda hidrostatik redüksiyon uygulandı. Periton irritasyonu bulgusu olmayan 17 (%21) hasta fiziksel inceleme, ultrasonografi ve klinik izleme alındı. Tamamı ince bağırsakta olan invajine segmentlerinin uzunlukları ultrasonografik olarak 1.8-2.3 cm arasında ölçülen bu hastalarda komplikasyonsuz spontan redüksiyon izlendi. Cerrahi uygulanan hastaların tümünde invajine segment en az 4 cm uzunluğundaydı. Rezeksiyon yapılan dört hastanın üçünde cerrahi öyküsü vardı. TARTIŞMA: Periton irritasyonu bulguları olan tüm intususepsiyon olgularında tedavi cerrahidir. Diğer durumlarda, tedavi yaklaşımı açısından ince bağırsak intususepsiyonları ileokolik intususepsiyonlardan ayrı değerlendirilmelidir. İnce bağırsak intususepsiyonu 2.3 cm'den kısaysa ultrasonografi desteğiyle klinik izlem güvenlidir; 4 cm'den uzun ve geçirilmiş karın cerrahisi varsa cerrahi müdahale ön planda düşünülmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEY, L. H., FAKIOĞLU, E., ACER, T., ÖTGÜN, İ., ARSLAN, E. E., AKILLI, M. S., HİÇSÖNMEZ, A. (2016). Her intususepsiyon tedavisi acil girişim veya cerrahi midir?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/324008

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bines J, Ivanoff B. Acute Intussusception in infants and children: Inci- dence, clinical presentation and management: a global perspective. Ge- neva: World Health Organization; 2002.
  2. Pepper VK, Stanfill AB, Pearl RH. Diagnosis and management of pedi- atric appendicitis, intussusception, and Meckel diverticulum. Surg Clin North Am 2012;92:505-26
  3. Huppertz HI, Soriano-Gabarró M, Grimprel E, Franco E, Mezner Z, Desselberger U, et al. Intussusception among young children in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25(1 Suppl):22-9.
  4. Mandeville K, Chien M, Willyerd FA, Mandell G, Hostetler MA, Bull- och B. Intussusception: clinical presentations and imaging characteristics. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:842-4.
  5. Ein SH, Stephens CA. Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years. J Pediatr Surg 1971;6:16-27.
  6. Mansour AM, El Koutby M, El Barbary MM, Mohamed W, Shehata S, El Mohammady H, et al. Enteric viral infections as potential risk factors for intussusception. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013;7:28-35.
  7. Nylund CM, Denson LA, Noel JM. Bacterial enteritis as a risk factor for childhood intussusception: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr 2010;156:761-5.
  8. Lappalainen S, Ylitalo S, Arola A, Halkosalo A, Räsänen S, Vesikari T. Simultaneous presence of human herpesvirus 6 and adenovirus in- fections in intestinal intussusception of young children. Acta Paediatr 2012;101:663-70.
  9. Hsu HY, Kao CL, Huang LM, Ni YH, Lai HS, Lin FY, et al. Viral eti- ology of intussusception in Taiwanese childhood. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:893-8.
  10. Bines JE, Liem NT, Justice FA, Son TN, Kirkwood CD, de Campo M, et al. Risk factors for intussusception in infants in Vietnam and Australia: adenovirus implicated, but not rotavirus. J Pediatr 2006;149:452-60.
  11. Sigmound EH, Daneman A. Intussusception. In: Grosfeld JL, O'Neil JA, Fonkalsrud EW, editors. Pediatric surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Year Book Inc; 2006. p. 1313-41.
  12. Zhang Y, Bai YZ, Li SX, Liu SJ, Ren WD, Zheng LQ. Sonographic findings predictive of the need for surgical management in pediatric patients with small bowel intussusceptions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:1035-40.
  13. Munden MM, Bruzzi JF, Coley BD, Munden RF. Sonography of pediat- ric small-bowel intussusception: differentiating surgical from nonsurgical cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:275-9.
  14. Fallon SC, Lopez ME, Zhang W, Brandt ML, Wesson DE, Lee TC, et al. Risk factors for surgery in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneu- matic reduction. J Pediatr Surg 2013;48:1032-6.
  15. Betz BW, Hagedo